Lexington vs Rhode Island: match statistics
Lexington vs Rhode Island: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lexington play Rhode Island in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Rhode Island: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Rhode Island scores 1.71 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lexington 64%, Rhode Island 71%. Over 2.5: Lexington 64%, Rhode Island 57%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Rhode Island has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.43. Lexington: 12.2 shots per match, Rhode Island: 16.5.
Match halves
Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Rhode Island: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14.
Goals by minute
Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). Rhode Island: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Prediction: home win (1). Lexington concedes on average 0.67 goals per home match, records clean sheets in 67% of home games and scores 1.33 goals per match with an xG of 1.34. Rhode Island generates more chances (avg. 15.5 shots and 7.5 on target per match) and posts an attacking xG of 1.91 and 1.5 goals on the road, but concedes an average of 3.0 goals away, has no clean sheets and has lost all away matches (100%). Both teams have similar recent point runs (1.4 PP90 over the last 5 matches), but Lexington has scored 13 goals in those five games versus Rhode Island’s 9, indicating superior goal momentum for the hosts. Considering Lexington’s defensive advantage (0.67 vs 3.0 avg. goals conceded) and higher clean sheet rate (67% vs 0%), I favor the home side to win, with a moderate chance of a draw due to the visitors’ offensive metrics.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lexington | Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lexington is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Lexington · 1.4 pts / match - Rhode Island
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rhode Island is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Lexington · 1.71 goals / match - Rhode Island
Rhode Island is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Lexington · 1.29 goals / match - Rhode Island
Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Rhode Island keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
Rhode Island scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Lexington
Over / Under — Rhode Island
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Rhode Island - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lexington
Rhode Island
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Lexington | Liga | Rhode Island | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Lexington vs Rhode Island?
The USL Championship match finished Lexington 1:3 Rhode Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Rhode Island?
Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Rhode Island 1.71. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 71% of Rhode Island's.
What form are Lexington and Rhode Island in?
Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Rhode Island 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Rhode Island?
The statistical background for Lexington vs Rhode Island — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.