Lexington vs San Antonio: match statistics
Lexington vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lexington played against San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on June 13, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Lexington has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. San Antonio has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Lexington scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 1.36. San Antonio scores 1.50 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's games and 50% of San Antonio's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 42%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lexington has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.45 per game. Lexington takes 12.8 shots per game, while San Antonio takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Lexington leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. San Antonio leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lexington's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For San Antonio, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Antonio sit 2nd in the table with a season record of 5 wins, 6 draws and 1 loss; the visitors arrive in good form (3 wins and 2 draws in their last 5, 2.2 points per game). Lexington win 40% of home matches, score on average 1.6 goals and concede 1.2 goals per match, and their home xG is 1.57 versus San Antonio’s away xG of 1.28. The hosts also create more high-quality chances — 5 shots on target per game versus 3.5 for the opponents — and have a lower percentage of matches without a goal (20% versus 50% for the visitors). Despite San Antonio’s better overall recent form (2.2 vs 1.4 points per game in the last 5), the high draw rate in the visitors’ away matches (67%) and Lexington’s advantage in xG and shots on target lead me to favor a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes is form: in the last 5 matches Lexington had BTTS in 100% (5/5), and San Antonio in 80% (4/5); both teams averaged 2.0 goals scored and conceded respectively 1.6 (Lexington) and 1.4 (San Antonio). Season-long stats are more balanced — both have a season BTTS rate of 50%, vs a league average of 55%, but seasonally Lexington scores 1.67 and concedes 0.83, while San Antonio scores 1.33 and concedes 1.5, indicating the away side is more often exposed to conceding. xG and shots data confirm goal potential: Lexington has xG 1.63 and xG against 1.37 with 5.17 shots on target per match; San Antonio has xG 1.28 and xG against 1.45 with 3.5 shots on target, so both teams create and allow chances. Partially opposing BTTS is the higher clean sheet expected for the home side — 50% vs 33% for the visitors — which reduces the risk of an away goal, but this factor is offset by recent form and goal stats. Considering the 5-match form (100% vs 80%), the xG creation advantage 1.63 vs 1.28 and seasonal averages (1.67/0.83 vs 1.33/1.5), I assess BTTS probability at 70% and tip "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis shows Lexington averages 1.67 goals scored per match with xG 1.63, while San Antonio averages 1.33 goals with xG 1.28. Defensively San Antonio concedes 1.50 goals per match versus 0.83 conceded by Lexington, and xG-adjusted expected goals are about 1.54 for Lexington and 1.33 for San Antonio. Averaging approaches (scored/conceded and xG) yields 1.56 and 1.20, i.e. a total of 2.76 expected goals, slightly above the league average of 2.74. Both teams have over 1.5 in 67% of their season matches, and in the last 5 matches Lexington recorded Over 2.5 in 80% and San Antonio in 60%, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest signal is to play OVER 1.5 (recommendation); Over 2.5 appears moderately attractive (~60%), while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (~24%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast Lexington to lead at the break and win by full-time (1/1). The home side led at half-time in 3 of 6 matches (50%) and average 0.83 goals by the break while conceding only 0.17, whereas San Antonio average 0.5 goals at half-time and concede 1.0, giving Lexington a clear advantage in the first half. Over the season Lexington win 67% of matches and accrue 2.33 points per game versus San Antonio’s 1.17, and the home side’s xG is 1.63 against the away side’s 1.28, confirming superior quality of chances. Additionally, the hosts average 5.17 shots on target versus San Antonio’s 3.5 and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 83% of games, so maintaining the lead into the second half appears most probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lexington | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
San Antonio is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Lexington · 1.8 pts / game - San Antonio
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Antonio is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - Lexington · 1.5 goals / game - San Antonio
San Antonio is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.36 goals / game - Lexington · 1.17 goals / game - San Antonio
Lexington scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
San Antonio scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lexington
Over / Under - San Antonio
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - Lexington · 1.67 pts / game - San Antonio
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lexington
San Antonio
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Lexington | Liga | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.73 | 2.75 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 53% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 28% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Lexington's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against San Antonio. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Lexington vs San Antonio?
The USL Championship match finished Lexington 2:0 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and San Antonio?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Lexington won 1, San Antonio won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs San Antonio?
Lexington score 1.36 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.50. The USL Championship average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 50% of San Antonio's.
What form are Lexington and San Antonio in?
Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and San Antonio 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs San Antonio?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


