Latvia - VirsligaStadions DaugavaData current as of September 06, 2026

Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
2 : 1half-time 1:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Liepāja played against BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Venue: Stadions Daugava. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Liepāja has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Liepāja scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.50. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.17 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Liepāja's games and 58% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 42%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.41 per game. Liepāja takes 11.8 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Liepāja leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Liepāja's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win because Liepāja shows superior form and efficiency recently: over the last five matches they averaged 1.4 points and scored 7 goals, while BFC Daugavpils has only 0.4 points and 3 goals. The visitors’ defense is weaker — Daugavpils concedes 2.4 goals on average away versus Liepāja’s 1.17 conceded at home, and away xG against for the visitors is 1.73 versus 1.26 for the hosts. Attacks are comparable (Liepāja 1.5 goals at home and xG 1.27 vs Daugavpils 1.6 goals away and xG 1.32), but the hosts have a possession edge 52% vs 42% and a better goal difference (+2 at home vs -4 for the visitors on the road). Liepāja also produces more effective chances (on average 4.17 shots on target at home vs 4.0 for the visitors and conversion 15% vs 14%), which combined with the visitors’ clear defensive issues increases the hosts’ chances. Therefore I estimate probabilities: 62% for a Liepāja win, 22% for a draw and 16% for a BFC Daugavpils win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean towards BTTS - Yes, primarily because the away team has a season BTTS of 100% and zero clean sheets (0%), meaning both teams have scored in all their matches. The league season BTTS is 59% with an average of 3.05 goals per match, which further increases the likelihood of goals being exchanged in Liepāja–BFC Daugavpils. The home team averages 0.86 goals per match this season, but in the last 5 matches their average has risen to 1.4 goals and their recent xG_for is 1.42, giving them a realistic chance to score at least once. The away side has a season scoring average of 1.6 goals and xG_for 1.32, while conceding 2.4 goals on average with xG_against 1.73, so their games are open and typically feature goals from both sides. Considering the away team's 100% BTTS, 60% BTTS for both teams in the last 5 matches, and no clean sheets for the away side, I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and pick 'Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate total goals around 3.01, based on home xG 1.47 and away xG 1.32 and defenses (xG conceded by away 1.73 and by home 1.50), yielding approximately 1.60 goals for Liepāja and 1.41 for BFC Daugavpils. Seasonal percentages support this: away matches finished over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, home matches in 43%, which strongly argues for at least 2 goals in the fixture. Additionally, the visitors have a shot conversion rate of 14% versus 7% for the hosts, score on average 1.6 goals and concede 2.4 goals per game, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. A Poisson model with lambda=3.01 gives probabilities of over 1.5 ≈80%, over 2.5 ≈58% and over 3.5 ≈36%, consistent with seasonal indicators (over1.5: away 100%/home 43%; over2.5: away 60%/home 29%). Therefore the strongest and most probable signal from the data is over 1.5, so I recommend betting Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Liepāja led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and scored an average of 0.8 goals before halftime in those games, while BFC Daugavpils have not won any of their last 5 matches (0% wins) and averaged 0.6 goals in their last 5 games. On the season level BFC concedes an average of 2.4 goals per match versus 1.0 conceded by Liepāja, and the home side’s xG is 1.47 compared to the visitors’ 1.32, suggesting Liepāja have an advantage in chance creation and the away defense is more vulnerable. Although away matches have featured goals at both ends in 100% of cases this season and the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs the home 7%), most goals come after halftime — BFC scores on average 1.2 goals in the second half — which creates a risk of a turnaround. Combining these signals (better xG and home form at halftime and the visitors’ high average goals conceded), the strongest scenario is Liepāja leading at the break and holding on to win, hence the pick 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
11Shots7
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
6Shots on target5
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.67xG1.25
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
7Corners4
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
77Dangerous attacks63
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
12Fouls13
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1Cards2
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.17Goals scored / game1.17
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.5Goals allowed / game1.58
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
54%Average possession46%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
3.92Shots on target / game4.33
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.75Shots per game11.58
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
3.92Shots on target4.33
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
9.9%Shot conversion10.1%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
54%Possession46%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.41xG for1.41
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.37xG against1.59
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Liepāja is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Liepāja · 0.4 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Liepāja
WDLLW
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
BFC Daugavpils
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-6
1.17 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liepāja is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Liepāja · 1.58 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)14
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
18Goals conceded (season)19
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
2.67Average goals per game2.75
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
7Goals scored (last 5)3
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
33%2 goals33%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%3 goals8%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%4 goals0%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal83%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
33%2 goals33%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%3 goals25%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%4 goals17%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time8%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
17%Scored in both halves17%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
60%BTTS - last 560%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BFC Daugavpils is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Liepāja · 1.25 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Liepāja - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.25
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.42
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.83
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
67%No goal before half-time67%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)0.92
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.92
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
25%Clean sheet after half-time25%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils
50%No goal after half-time42%
LiepājaBFC Daugavpils

Liepāja - second-half results

33% W25% R42% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

17% W42% R42% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Liepāja - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.60
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
3
46-60
0
2
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
7
8
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals per game 2.673.08 2.75
Both teams scored 58%59% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%55% 42%
Clean sheets 8%21% 17%
Goal before half-time 83%77% 58%
Goal after half-time 92%86% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardCeti Junior Taty Tchibinda
  2. BFC DaugavpilsGoalRostand NdjikiAssist: Joel Yakubu
  3. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Ervīns PiņaskinsOff: Abdoul Kader Traore
  4. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardWilliam Eseme Mukwelle
  5. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Amar HaïdaraOff: Chovanie Amatkarijo
  6. LiepājaYellow cardDjibril Gueye

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Liepāja's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 3.20 goals, and both teams scored in 80% of them.

BFC Daugavpils
2 : 0
Liepāja
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
FK Liepāja
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
4 : 2
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 2:1 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 2, BFC Daugavpils won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?

Liepāja score 1.17 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.17. The Virsliga average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Liepāja's matches and 58% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are Liepāja and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils?

The statistical background for Liepāja vs BFC Daugavpils — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.