Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 20 July 2026

Liepāja vs Riga: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Riga crest
Riga
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Riga presents better form in the last five matches, earning an average of 1.6 points per match compared to Liepāja's 1.4 points. The visitors have won two of their last five meetings and recorded two draws, while the hosts have an identical number of wins but more losses. Riga boasts a better goal difference in the last five matches (8 scored, 5 conceded) than Liepāja (6 scored, 10 conceded), evidencing more solid play in both attack and defense. The visitors' form expressed by the series 'wwddl' shows greater stability than the hosts' 'lwdwl'. Considering all these factors, Riga holds the advantage in this clash, though the difference is not dominant, leaving room for a closely contested match.

Liepāja vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liepāja play Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Liepāja: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liepāja scores 1.27 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liepāja 55%, Riga 57%. Over 2.5: Liepāja 59%, Riga 83%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.50. Liepāja: 12.4 shots per match, Riga: 17.2.

Match halves

Liepāja: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68. Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43.

Goals by minute

Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-0-6. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Riga presents better form in the last five matches, earning an average of 1.6 points per match compared to Liepāja's 1.4 points. The visitors have won two of their last five meetings and recorded two draws, while the hosts have an identical number of wins but more losses. Riga boasts a better goal difference in the last five matches (8 scored, 5 conceded) than Liepāja (6 scored, 10 conceded), evidencing more solid play in both attack and defense. The visitors' form expressed by the series 'wwddl' shows greater stability than the hosts' 'lwdwl'. Considering all these factors, Riga holds the advantage in this clash, though the difference is not dominant, leaving room for a closely contested match.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

34Possession (%)66
LiepājaRiga
11Shots11
LiepājaRiga
4Shots on target2
LiepājaRiga
1.33xG1.22
LiepājaRiga
1Corners4
LiepājaRiga
50Dangerous attacks53
LiepājaRiga
16Fouls13
LiepājaRiga
1Cards4
LiepājaRiga

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match2.96
LiepājaRiga
1.55Goals conceded / match0.87
LiepājaRiga
52%Average possession63%
LiepājaRiga
4.32Shots on target / match6.43
LiepājaRiga

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.41Shots per match17.22
LiepājaRiga
4.32Shots on target6.43
LiepājaRiga
10.3%Shot conversion17.2%
LiepājaRiga
52%Possession63%
LiepājaRiga
1.5xG for2.04
LiepājaRiga
1.49xG against0.94
LiepājaRiga

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedRiga: Dominant
LiepājaRiga
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 333% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Liepāja · 2.6 pts / match - Riga

Liepāja
LLLWL
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-10
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
78% W17% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-1
2.52 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.10Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 133% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Liepāja · 2.96 goals / match - Riga

Riga is 78% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Liepāja · 0.87 goals / match - Riga

Liepāja scoring profile: strong

Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

28Goals scored (season)68
LiepājaRiga
34Goals conceded (season)20
LiepājaRiga
2.82Average goals in match3.83
LiepājaRiga
5Goals scored (last 5)12
LiepājaRiga
10Goals conceded (last 5)1
LiepājaRiga

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal96%
LiepājaRiga
36%2 goals87%
LiepājaRiga
14%3 goals65%
LiepājaRiga
9%4 goals30%
LiepājaRiga

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
LiepājaRiga
36%2 goals22%
LiepājaRiga
18%3 goals9%
LiepājaRiga
9%4 goals0%
LiepājaRiga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time26%
LiepājaRiga
0%BTTS in both halves9%
LiepājaRiga
23%Scored in both halves61%
LiepājaRiga

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
LiepājaRiga
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS26%
LiepājaRiga
20%BTTS - last 520%
LiepājaRiga

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
LiepājaRiga
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time70%
LiepājaRiga
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time35%
LiepājaRiga

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
LiepājaRiga
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
LiepājaRiga
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
LiepājaRiga

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Liepāja · 2.22 pts / match - Riga

Liepāja - half-time state
36% leading14% draw50% trailing
Riga - half-time state
70% leading13% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)2.22
LiepājaRiga
0.59Goals scored (1st half)1.52
LiepājaRiga
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
LiepājaRiga
1.36Average goals (1st half)2
LiepājaRiga
45%Clean sheet before half-time61%
LiepājaRiga
64%No goal before half-time22%
LiepājaRiga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)2.22
LiepājaRiga
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)1.43
LiepājaRiga
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
LiepājaRiga
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.83
LiepājaRiga
36%Clean sheet after half-time70%
LiepājaRiga
45%No goal after half-time22%
LiepājaRiga

Liepāja - second-half results

32% W32% R36% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - second-half results

65% W26% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+24
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
2
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
4
31-45
9
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.92
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
223%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaRiga
Average goals in match 2.823.01 3.83
Both teams scored 55%57% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%56% 83%
Clean sheets 14%23% 43%
Goal before half-time 86%76% 91%
Goal after half-time 86%85% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Liepāja 0 - 0 - 6 Riga. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Riga FC
4 : 0
FK Liepāja
Riga FC
1 : 0
FK Liepāja
Riga FC
3 : 0
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 5
Riga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Riga?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 2:1 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and Riga?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 0, Riga won 6 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Riga?

Liepāja score 1.27 goals per game on average and Riga 2.96. The Virsliga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Liepāja's matches and 57% of Riga's.

What form are Liepāja and Riga in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Riga 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Riga?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Liepāja vs Riga: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.