Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 12, 2026

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

135%(3.80)
X35%(3.50)
230%(1.96)

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, making a draw the most probable result. Patro Eisden occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and has a better away record with a +4 goal difference, whereas Lierse Kempenzonen sits at a -1 goal difference at home. Form over the last five matches favors the hosts (1.8 points per game versus the visitors' 1.0), which could offset Patro Eisden's class advantage. Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%) and similar average xG, suggesting an evenly matched attacking potential. Patro Eisden's high away draw percentage (36%) and the visitors' poor form in recent fixtures (only 1 win in their last 5 matches) further support the shared points scenario.

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lierse Kempenzonen played against Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 13, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Lierse Kempenzonen has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Patro Eisden has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.15 goals per game and allows 1.33. Patro Eisden scores 1.36 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of Lierse Kempenzonen's games and 54% of Patro Eisden's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 43%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Patro Eisden has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.41 per game. Lierse Kempenzonen takes 12.1 shots per game, while Patro Eisden takes 15.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Lierse Kempenzonen leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lierse Kempenzonen's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Patro Eisden, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, making a draw the most probable result. Patro Eisden occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and has a better away record with a +4 goal difference, whereas Lierse Kempenzonen sits at a -1 goal difference at home. Form over the last five matches favors the hosts (1.8 points per game versus the visitors' 1.0), which could offset Patro Eisden's class advantage. Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%) and similar average xG, suggesting an evenly matched attacking potential. Patro Eisden's high away draw percentage (36%) and the visitors' poor form in recent fixtures (only 1 win in their last 5 matches) further support the shared points scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Shots25
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Shots on target13
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.81xG2.93
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2Corners5
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
40Dangerous attacks63
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
18Fouls12
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
5Cards4
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.15Goals scored / game1.36
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.33Goals allowed / game1.18
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
47%Average possession37%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3.89Shots on target / game5.07
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.11Shots per game14.96
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3.89Shots on target5.07
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
9.5%Shot conversion9.1%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
47%Possession37%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.41xG for1.65
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.66xG against1.08
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Lierse Kempenzonen: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 pts / game - Patro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen
LLWWW
Season result split
33% W22% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-12
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Patro Eisden
WLLDD
Season result split
43% W32% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-7
1.61 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.15 goals / game - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.36 goals / game - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.18 goals / game - Patro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 meczów), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)38
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
36Goals conceded (season)33
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2.48Average goals per game2.54
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal71%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
30%2 goals39%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
15%3 goals14%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
4%4 goals11%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal68%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
44%2 goals36%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
11%3 goals7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7%4 goals7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 27 meczów
53%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time18%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
11%BTTS in both halves7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
22%Scored in both halves21%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 580%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
36% leading46% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per game (1st half)1.54
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.26Average goals (1st half)0.96
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
59%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
48%No goal before half-time57%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per game (2nd half)1.25
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
41%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
63%No goal after half-time50%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

11% W52% D37% L
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W39% D32% L
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.60
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Patro Eisden - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.6
Average goals per game0.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
3
31-45
5
8
46-60
6
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lierse KempenzonenLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals per game 2.482.77 2.54
Both teams scored 48%53% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%51% 43%
Clean sheets 30%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 74%71% 61%
Goal after half-time 70%78% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenYellow cardKjetil Borry
  2. Lierse KempenzonenGoalAlexandre Stanic
  3. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardHugo Masaki Muadi-Dado
  4. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro Rousseau
  5. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardVincent De Vos
  6. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardWout Debuyser
  7. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raymond AsanteOff: Ridwane M'Barki
  8. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardWout Debuyser
  9. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Elton YeboahOff: Emmanuel Matuta La Nkenda Nosa
  10. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro RousseauAssist: Stef Peeters
  11. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Toni Lun BončinaOff: Noam Mayoka-Tika
  12. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raphaël Boakye SarfoOff: Milan Robberechts
  13. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardHugo Masaki Muadi-Dado
  14. Patro EisdenYellow cardLéandro Rousseau
  15. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Daan De PeuterOff: Victor Daguin
  16. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Denys PrychynenkoOff: Léandro Rousseau
  17. Patro EisdenYellow cardDenys Prychynenko
  18. Patro EisdenYellow cardRaymond Asante

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michiel AllaertsMatches officiated: 11
5.36Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins27%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Lierse Kempenzonen's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Patro Eisden. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 1
KSK Lierse Kempenzonen

FAQ

What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 1:2 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Lierse Kempenzonen score 1.15 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.36. The First Division B average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 54% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.