England - EFL League OneData current as of September 13, 2026

Lincoln City vs Wycombe Wanderers: match statistics

Lincoln City vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lincoln City played against Wycombe Wanderers in EFL League One (England). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Recent form

Lincoln City has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Wycombe Wanderers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Lincoln City scores 1.89 goals per game and allows 0.86. Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.43 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Lincoln City's games and 50% of Wycombe Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Wycombe Wanderers has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.45 per game. Lincoln City takes 12.6 shots per game, while Wycombe Wanderers takes 12.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Lincoln City leads at halftime in 66% of its games and scores 0.91 goals per game after halftime. Wycombe Wanderers leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.82 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lincoln City's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (19 goals). For Wycombe Wanderers, it is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lincoln City are clear favorites: they have 29 wins, 10 draws and 5 losses this season, win 77% of home matches and possess a home goal difference of +32, whereas Wycombe win only 18% away and have an away goal difference of -10. The hosts score 2.23 goals per home match on average, their average xG is 1.66, they register 5.91 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 15%, while Wycombe score 0.95 goals away, have xG 1.35, 3.68 shots on target and an 8% conversion. Defensively Lincoln concede 0.77 goals per home match and have an average xG against of 1.17, whereas Wycombe concede 1.41 goals away and have xG against 1.44; additionally Wycombe fail to score in 32% of away games, while Lincoln fail to score in only 5% of home matches. In the last 5 matches Lincoln have 4 wins and 1 draw (2.6 points per game) with 9 goals scored, and Wycombe have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per game) with 8 goals, illustrating the hosts’ superior form. Considering the higher quality of chances (xG 1.66 vs 1.35), greater number of shots on target (5.91 vs 3.68) and better conversion (15% vs 8%), I predict a home win, estimating probabilities of roughly 75% for Lincoln, 15% for a draw and 10% for Wycombe.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis points to a 'no' scenario — i.e., at least one team will not score; Lincoln averages 1.91 goals per match (83 goals this season) with xG 1.62, while conceding only 0.95 goals on average and keeping 36% clean sheets, indicating a solid home defense. Wycombe away averages 0.95 goals per match and xG 1.35, records just 3.68 shots on target on average and has a shot conversion rate of 8%, which lowers their likelihood of scoring. In the last 5 matches Wycombe averaged 1.6 goals (8 goals in 5 matches) but conceded 1.8 (9 goals), whereas Lincoln scored 1.8 (9 goals) and conceded 0.8 (4 goals), so Lincoln's defensive form reduces the visitors' scoring chances. Season BTTS rates are mixed (Lincoln at home 45%, Wycombe away 55%, league 52%), but the strong home defensive metrics and low away conversion push the decision toward 'no'. Therefore I assess BTTS 'no' at about 60% versus 40% for 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I assess expected goals using xG: Lincoln attack xG 1.62 and Wycombe defense xG 1.44 yield expected goals for the home side 1.53, while Wycombe attack xG 1.35 and Lincoln defense xG 1.06 yield 1.21; total = 2.74. Seasonal stats support the Over option: Lincoln scored 83 goals (avg 1.91 per match) and has a season rate of matches above 1.5 goals = 86%, Wycombe has 73% of matches above 1.5 and scores on average 0.95 goals, which together give a strong signal for Over 1.5. In the context of Over 2.5, season percentages are 59% for Lincoln and 41% for Wycombe (avg 50%), but the last 5 matches show 60% (Lincoln) and 80% (Wycombe) Over 2.5, and in the last 5 rounds both teams scored 9 and 8 goals respectively (1.8 and 1.6 per match), which lifts the probability of Over 2.5 to around 63%. Additionally, Lincoln averages 13.73 shots and 5.5 on target per match with a conversion of 14%, versus Wycombe 11.73 shots, 3.68 on target and 8% conversion, so the hosts are more efficient and increase the chance of more goals. Given the expected 2.74 goals I pick Over 2.5 as the best line (over), with Over 1.5 also very likely (84%), while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (28%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Lincoln City are clear favorites: seasonally they score an average of 1.91 goals per game versus 0.95 for Wycombe and win 55% of matches, while the visitors win only 18%. The hosts lead at the break in 59% of games and average 0.86 goals by half-time vs 0.36 for their opponents, with an average of 0.45 conceded before the break. Their advantage is confirmed by xG 1.62 vs 1.35, 5.5 shots on target vs 3.68 and a higher conversion rate 14% vs 8%, which increases the likelihood of a goal before half-time and of holding the lead. In the last 5 matches Lincoln have won 80% of fixtures and led at the break in 60%, and in the second half they score an average of 1.05 goals, so maintaining or extending the lead is realistic. On that basis the most likely scenario is 1/1 (I project 44%); alternatives are a draw after half-time (1/X 11%) or an away win (e.g. 2/2 13%), however the statistics clearly favor Lincoln.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
2 : 3
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
13Shots27
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
7Shots on target7
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.62xG2.82
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
2Corners10
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
43Dangerous attacks88
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
13Fouls8
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
2Cards1
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.89Goals scored / game1.43
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0.86Goals allowed / game1.18
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
42%Average possession53%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
4.64Shots on target / game4.59
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.59Shots per game12.73
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
4.64Shots on target4.59
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
15%Shot conversion11.3%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
42%Possession53%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.45xG for1.48
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.25xG against1.25
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Shooting quality

Lincoln City: Counter-attackingWycombe Wanderers: Balanced
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lincoln City is 225% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Lincoln City · 0.8 pts / game - Wycombe Wanderers

Lincoln City
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
66% W23% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
29-10-5
2.20 pts / game · goal difference +45
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
17-4-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Wycombe Wanderers
WLLDL
Season result split
36% W27% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-16
1.36 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-9-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lincoln City is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.89 goals / game - Lincoln City · 1.43 goals / game - Wycombe Wanderers

Lincoln City is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.86 goals / game - Lincoln City · 1.18 goals / game - Wycombe Wanderers

Lincoln City scoring profile: very strong

Lincoln City scores in 89% of games (39 of 44 meczów), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 32% (14 of 44 meczów).

Wycombe Wanderers scoring profile: strong

Wycombe Wanderers scores in 75% of games (33 of 44 meczów), while Lincoln City keeps a clean sheet in 41% (18 of 44 meczów).

83Goals scored (season)63
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
38Goals conceded (season)52
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
2.75Average goals per game2.61
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
9Goals scored (last 5)8
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal75%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
64%2 goals43%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
25%3 goals18%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
9%4 goals7%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal68%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
23%2 goals36%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
5%3 goals11%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0%4 goals2%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
Wycombe Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 44 meczów
52%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time11%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
2%BTTS in both halves0%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
48%Scored in both halves32%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
60%BTTS - last 540%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lincoln City is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / game - Lincoln City · 1.55 pts / game - Wycombe Wanderers

Lincoln City - half-time state
66% leading23% draw11% trailing
Wycombe Wanderers - half-time state
43% leading25% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per game (1st half)1.55
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0.98Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.2
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
75%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
23%No goal before half-time50%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per game (2nd half)1.64
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
1.41Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
52%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers
41%No goal after half-time43%
Lincoln CityWycombe Wanderers

Lincoln City - second-half results

45% W32% D23% L
97
Half-time points
43
Half-time goals
+27
Goal difference (1st half)
74
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 66% of games and wins 66%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results

48% W20% D32% L
68
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
72
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 36%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Lincoln City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Wycombe Wanderers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lincoln City
ScoredConceded
11
5
0-15
13
4
16-30
19
7
31-45
7
5
46-60
15
6
61-75
18
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Wycombe Wanderers
ScoredConceded
10
8
0-15
10
6
16-30
7
12
31-45
7
7
46-60
13
8
61-75
16
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lincoln City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Wycombe Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Lincoln CityLigaWycombe Wanderers
Average goals per game 2.752.60 2.61
Both teams scored 50%52% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%50% 50%
Clean sheets 41%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 84%70% 80%
Goal after half-time 82%80% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lincoln CityGoalJack MoylanAssist: Ryley Towler
  2. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Armando QuitirnaOff: Niall Huggins
  3. Lincoln CityYellow cardSonny Bradley
  4. Wycombe WanderersGoalJosh Scowen
  5. Lincoln CityYellow cardIvan Varfolomieiev
  6. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Jamie MullinsOff: Luke Harris
  7. Wycombe WanderersGoalDeclan Skura
  8. Lincoln CityGoalTendayi DarikwaAssist: George Wickens
  9. Wycombe WanderersSubstitutionOn: Ewan HendersonOff: Declan Skura
  10. Lincoln CitySubstitutionOn: Alfie LloydOff: Reeco Lee Hackett-Fairchild
  11. Lincoln CitySubstitutionOn: Erik RingOff: Ben House
  12. Wycombe WanderersGoalCauley WoodrowAssist: Josh Scowen
  13. Wycombe WanderersYellow cardArmando Quitirna

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Scott OldhamMatches officiated: 17
4.29Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 259%Home wins28%Draws12%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Lincoln City's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Wycombe Wanderers. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Lincoln City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

The EFL League One match finished Lincoln City 4:3 Wycombe Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lincoln City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

Lincoln City score 1.89 goals per game on average and Wycombe Wanderers 1.43. The EFL League One average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Lincoln City's matches and 50% of Wycombe Wanderers's.

What form are Lincoln City and Wycombe Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Lincoln City have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Wycombe Wanderers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lincoln City vs Wycombe Wanderers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.