Linfield vs Crusaders: match statistics
Linfield vs Crusaders: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Linfield played against Crusaders in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Linfield has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Crusaders has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Linfield scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.71. Crusaders scores 1.86 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Linfield's games and 86% of Crusaders's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 100%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Linfield has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.09 per game. Linfield takes 13.4 shots per game, while Crusaders takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Linfield leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Crusaders leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Linfield's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Crusaders, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NIFL Premiership games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Linfield head into this match on the back of 5 consecutive wins, scoring 7 goals and conceding just 1, while Crusaders have lost 2 of their last 5 fixtures and conceded as many as 10 goals during that period. The hosts win 75% of their home matches, with an average xG of 1.87 and just 1.00 xG allowed to opponents. Crusaders concede an average of 2.33 goals per away game, have kept no clean sheets and allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.98 xG. Linfield average 16.5 shots at home compared with Crusaders’ 9 attempts away, while also enjoying 53% possession, which should translate into noticeably greater control of the match. The visitors are capable of scoring, having failed to score in none of their away matches and converting 15% of their shots, but their defensive weakness and the disparity in form point towards a Linfield victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data strongly supports goals at both ends: Linfield and Crusaders have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, and neither side has kept a clean sheet. Linfield average 2.00 goals scored at home, while Crusaders concede as many as 2.33 away from home, with an average xG against them of 1.98. The visitors average 4.00 shots on target per match and score 1.33 goals, giving them a strong case to exploit the fact that the hosts concede 1.67 goals per game on average across the season. The main risk to BTTS comes from Linfield’s recent form, as they have conceded just 0.2 goals across their last five matches, with BTTS landing in only 20% of those games. Despite this defensive improvement, Crusaders’ attacking weakness and their 100% BTTS record in their last five matches marginally support the scenario in which both teams find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Linfield have favorable conditions to score, having created an average of 1.73 xG over their last 5 matches, while Crusaders allowed 1.67 xG and conceded an average of 2.0 goals during the same period. The home side scored 7 goals in their last five games, whereas their opponents conceded 10 over the same span, reinforcing the forecast of at least two goals in the match. In the season data, both teams had 100% of their matches finish with a minimum of 2 goals, and each team scored and conceded in every game. At the same time, Linfield’s defense has been highly stable recently, conceding an average of just 0.2 goals in their last five appearances, which is why the full Over 2.5 line does not have an equally clear edge. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as Linfield’s attacking profile and Crusaders’ poor recent defensive record clearly increase the likelihood of two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Linfield win, as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not concede a single goal before half-time in any of them. Linfield have won all 5 of their last matches, averaging 1.4 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded, while Crusaders allow opponents to score an average of 2.0 goals. After the break, the hosts are particularly effective: they won the second half in 80% of their last five appearances, scoring an average of 1.0 goal while conceding only 0.2. Crusaders did not win any second half during this period, and in 80% of those matches they were level after the break. Season-long data continues to point to a Linfield advantage, with the team winning 67% of its matches compared with 33% for Crusaders, while the visitors concede an average of 2.33 goals per game.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Linfield | Crusaders | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.54 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Linfield is 44% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Linfield · 1.8 pts / game - Crusaders
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Crusaders is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Linfield · 1.86 goals / game - Crusaders
Linfield is 141% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Linfield · 1.71 goals / game - Crusaders
Linfield scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Crusaders keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
Crusaders scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Linfield keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Linfield
Over / Under - Crusaders
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Linfield is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - Linfield · 1.43 pts / game - Crusaders
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Linfield - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Crusaders - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Linfield
Crusaders
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Linfield | Liga | Crusaders | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.86 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 48% | ▲ 86% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 53% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 28% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 65% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 90% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Linfield's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Crusaders. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Linfield vs Crusaders?
The NIFL Premiership match finished Linfield 1:0 Crusaders. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Linfield and Crusaders?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Linfield won 3, Crusaders won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Linfield vs Crusaders?
Linfield score 1.14 goals per game on average and Crusaders 1.86. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Linfield's matches and 86% of Crusaders's.
What form are Linfield and Crusaders in?
Over the last 5 games Linfield have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Crusaders 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Linfield vs Crusaders?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Linfield vs Crusaders: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


