LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka: match statistics
LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
LNZ Cherkasy played against Kudrivka in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
LNZ Cherkasy has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Kudrivka has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
LNZ Cherkasy scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 0.62. Kudrivka scores 1.31 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 15% of LNZ Cherkasy's games and 69% of Kudrivka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 15% and 69%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
LNZ Cherkasy has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.15 per game. LNZ Cherkasy takes 15.0 shots per game, while Kudrivka takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
LNZ Cherkasy leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Kudrivka leads at halftime in 46% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
LNZ Cherkasy's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Kudrivka, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ukrainian Premier League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| LNZ Cherkasy | Kudrivka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
LNZ Cherkasy is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - LNZ Cherkasy · 0.8 pts / game - Kudrivka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kudrivka is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - LNZ Cherkasy · 1.31 goals / game - Kudrivka
LNZ Cherkasy is 223% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.62 goals / game - LNZ Cherkasy · 2 goals / game - Kudrivka
LNZ Cherkasy scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Kudrivka keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
Kudrivka scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 69% (9 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - LNZ Cherkasy
Over / Under - Kudrivka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
LNZ Cherkasy is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.77 pts / game - LNZ Cherkasy · 1.46 pts / game - Kudrivka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kudrivka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 31%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
LNZ Cherkasy
Kudrivka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| LNZ Cherkasy | Liga | Kudrivka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.69 | 2.66 | ▲ 3.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 15% | 49% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 47% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 31% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | • 69% | 70% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 54% | 76% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?
The Ukrainian Premier League match finished LNZ Cherkasy 1:0 Kudrivka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?
LNZ Cherkasy score 1.08 goals per game on average and Kudrivka 1.31. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 15% of LNZ Cherkasy's matches and 69% of Kudrivka's.
What form are LNZ Cherkasy and Kudrivka in?
Over the last 5 games LNZ Cherkasy have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Kudrivka 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka?
The statistical background for LNZ Cherkasy vs Kudrivka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.