Lokomotiv vs Qizilqum: match statistics
Lokomotiv vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lokomotiv played against Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on May 4, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Lokomotiv has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Qizilqum has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Lokomotiv scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.40. Qizilqum scores 0.80 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Lokomotiv's games and 30% of Qizilqum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lokomotiv has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.19 per game. Lokomotiv takes 13.6 shots per game, while Qizilqum takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Lokomotiv leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Qizilqum leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lokomotiv's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Qizilqum, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lokomotiv has the advantage in quality of chances: at home they average 14.25 shots and 4.5 on target per match, with xG 1.76 and 13 goals scored this season, while Qizilqum away records 10.75 shots, 3.25 on target, xG 1.21 and only 8 goals. The hosts control the ball significantly more (57% possession vs 37% for the visitors), which—given equal conversion rates of 7% for both teams—translates into a higher volume of chances for Lokomotiv. In the last 5 matches both teams averaged 1.4 points, but Lokomotiv scored 7 goals versus Qizilqum’s 4, and the hosts have a lower xG against (1.07 vs 1.38), indicating better defensive control by the home side. At the same time both teams failed to score in 50% of matches and Lokomotiv has only 25% clean sheets at home, while Qizilqum has 50% clean sheets away, which increases the risk of a low-scoring game or draw. Considering the advantage in possession, shot volume and xG, with moderate risk due to low finishing, I assess the chances as: home win ~60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes as more likely (65% vs 35%), based on the hosts’ recent form and both teams’ profiles. Lokomotiv have BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches, scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and conceded 8 (1.6), with recent offensive xG 1.86 vs season xG 1.17, indicating higher chance creation and risk of conceding. Qizilqum have season BTTS 0% and keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, averaging 0.75 goals per game, which is a strong counterargument against BTTS; however, in their last 5 fixtures the visitors show BTTS 40% and recent offensive xG 1.25, so they also create chances. Additionally, the league BTTS rate is 55% with an average goals 2.63, and the teams’ seasonal xG are 1.17 vs 1.21, which together favors the scenario that both teams will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.28 goals from Lokomotiv and 1.23 from Qizilqum: I used Lokomotiv’s average xG scored 1.17 and Qizilqum’s xG conceded 1.38 (gives 1.28), and Qizilqum’s average xG scored 1.21 and Lokomotiv’s xG conceded 1.26 (gives 1.23), which totals 2.51 goals. This aligns with form: Lokomotiv in the last 5 matches has xG 1.86 and scored 7 goals (1.4 per match), Qizilqum has xG 1.25 and 4 goals in 5 matches (0.8 per match). Season-long rates confirm a high probability of at least two goals — Over 1.5 is 67% for the home side and 75% for the away side — and with a total of 2.51 the model gives about a 72% chance of Over 1.5. At the same time the probability of Over 2.5 is moderate (model ≈46%), and the stats are divergent: the home team has 67% of matches over 2.5, but the away team has 0% Over 2.5 this season, which weakens value on the 2.5 line. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (Over 1.5 ≈72%), while Over 2.5 (~46%) and Over 3.5 (~25%) do not appear to offer sufficient edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Qizilqum have won 50% of matches compared to Lokomotiv’s 33% at home, with similar xG: 1.21 for the visitors versus 1.17 for the hosts, indicating an advantage for the away side in final outcomes. At half-time the visitors keep a clean sheet in 75% of matches and concede an average of 0.25 goals, whereas Lokomotiv concedes an average of 1.0 goals by the break and lead at the break in only 33% of their home games, so an HT draw or a lead for the visitors is likely. In the second half Qizilqum average 1.5 points versus Lokomotiv’s 0.83 points, suggesting the visitors more often achieve a turnaround after the break. With a 50% clean-sheet rate for the season and low average goals conceded by the visitors before half-time (0.25), I select the scenario of Half-Time draw and Qizilqum Full-Time win (X/2) as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lokomotiv | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lokomotiv is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Lokomotiv · 0.8 goals / game - Qizilqum
Lokomotiv scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).
Qizilqum scores in 50% of games (5 of 10 meczów), while Lokomotiv keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lokomotiv
Over / Under - Qizilqum
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lokomotiv is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Lokomotiv · 1.2 pts / game - Qizilqum
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lokomotiv - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lokomotiv
Qizilqum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Lokomotiv | Liga | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.70 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 26% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 68% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 78% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Lokomotiv vs Qizilqum?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Lokomotiv 1:0 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lokomotiv vs Qizilqum?
Lokomotiv score 1.30 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.80. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Lokomotiv's matches and 30% of Qizilqum's.
What form are Lokomotiv and Qizilqum in?
Over the last 5 games Lokomotiv have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lokomotiv vs Qizilqum?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


