Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: match statistics

Lommel United crest
Lommel United
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II

Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lommel United play Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Lommel United: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Club Brugge II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lommel United scores 1.94 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lommel United 64%, Club Brugge II 56%. Over 2.5: Lommel United 64%, Club Brugge II 56%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lommel United has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.34. Lommel United: 14.8 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 11.7.

Match halves

Lommel United: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.06. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Lommel United: 76-90+ (17 goals). Club Brugge II: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a home win (Lommel United): they have a 53% home win rate and sit 4th in the table, while Club Brugge II have only a 7% away win rate and are 16th. Offensively Lommel average 1.93 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.86 and 5.93 shots on target per game, whereas Club Brugge II score 1.20 goals away with xG 1.38 and 3.33 shots on target. Defensively the hosts concede 1.27 goals per home match versus 1.8 conceded by the visitors away; this season the visitors have let in 55 goals compared to the hosts’ 43, giving Lommel a clear defensive edge. Trends reinforce the home advantage: in the last 5 matches Lommel have scored 9 goals and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with an average 1.6 points per game, while Club Brugge II have scored 5 goals, have no wins in their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering better quality of chances (xG 1.86 vs 1.38), higher share of shots on target and greater conversion (12% vs 10%), and a lower share of goalless home matches for the hosts (13% vs 20%), I assess probabilities as: home 70%, draw 20%, away 10%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
22Shots13
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6Shots on target7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
2.21xG1.56
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
5Corners7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
57Dangerous attacks34
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
15Fouls7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1Cards1
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.94Goals scored / match1.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.36Goals conceded / match1.72
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
54%Average possession56%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
5.83Shots on target / match4.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.81Shots per match11.69
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
5.83Shots on target4.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
13.1%Shot conversion8.8%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
54%Possession56%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.69xG for1.34
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.38xG against1.83
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Shooting quality

Lommel United: AttackingClub Brugge II: Balanced
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lommel United is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Lommel United · 1 pts / match - Club Brugge II

Lommel United
LWWWW
Season result split
53% W22% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-8-9
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Club Brugge II
DDLLW
Season result split
16% W19% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-21
0.66 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-11
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 88% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.03 goals / match - Club Brugge II

Lommel United is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.72 goals / match - Club Brugge II

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

Club Brugge II scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

70Goals scored (season)33
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
49Goals conceded (season)55
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
3.31Average goals in match2.75
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
12Goals scored (last 5)5
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal69%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
69%2 goals28%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
36%3 goals6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6%4 goals0%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal84%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
42%2 goals56%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
11%3 goals22%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6%4 goals6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time9%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
11%BTTS in both halves6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
36%Scored in both halves13%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
80%BTTS - last 540%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lommel United is 95% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.81 pts / match - Club Brugge II

Lommel United - half-time state
39% leading42% draw19% trailing
Club Brugge II - half-time state
13% leading44% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)0.81
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.47Average goals (1st half)0.94
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
53%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
42%No goal before half-time78%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.06Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.81
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
44%Clean sheet after half-time34%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
39%No goal after half-time41%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Lommel United - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
57
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Club Brugge II - second-half results

19% W47% R34% P
26
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lommel United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Club Brugge II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
11
7
16-30
12
10
31-45
11
12
46-60
10
6
61-75
17
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
5
3
16-30
2
10
31-45
6
8
46-60
10
16
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaClub Brugge II
Average goals in match 3.312.84 2.75
Both teams scored 64%55% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%54% 56%
Clean sheets 22%26% 16%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 63%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lommel United 1 - 0 - 0 Club Brugge II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Club Brugge KV II
0 : 2
Lommel United

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

Lommel United score 1.94 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.03. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lommel United's matches and 56% of Club Brugge II's.

What form are Lommel United and Club Brugge II in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Club Brugge II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.