Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: match statistics
Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lommel United played against Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Lommel United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Club Brugge II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Lommel United scores 1.93 goals per game and allows 1.43. Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Lommel United's games and 58% of Club Brugge II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 58%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lommel United has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.33 per game. Lommel United takes 15.4 shots per game, while Club Brugge II takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Lommel United leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. Club Brugge II leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.77 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lommel United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Club Brugge II, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Lommel United): they have a 53% home win rate and sit 4th in the table, while Club Brugge II have only a 7% away win rate and are 16th. Offensively Lommel average 1.93 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.86 and 5.93 shots on target per game, whereas Club Brugge II score 1.20 goals away with xG 1.38 and 3.33 shots on target. Defensively the hosts concede 1.27 goals per home match versus 1.8 conceded by the visitors away; this season the visitors have let in 55 goals compared to the hosts’ 43, giving Lommel a clear defensive edge. Trends reinforce the home advantage: in the last 5 matches Lommel have scored 9 goals and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with an average 1.6 points per game, while Club Brugge II have scored 5 goals, have no wins in their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering better quality of chances (xG 1.86 vs 1.38), higher share of shots on target and greater conversion (12% vs 10%), and a lower share of goalless home matches for the hosts (13% vs 20%), I assess probabilities as: home 70%, draw 20%, away 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "both teams to score" scenario looks more likely: Club Brugge II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 73% versus Lommel's 44%, while the league average BTTS is 54%. In Lommel's last 5 matches BTTS is 80%, they average 1.8 goals and generate xG 1.98 per game, whereas Club Brugge II in their last five matches concede on average 1.6 goals and have xG against of 2.35, indicating clear chances created and allowed by both sides. Season-long both teams concede heavily: Lommel on average 1.75 goals per match, Club Brugge II 1.8 goals, and the clean sheet expected rate is only 13% for both teams, which reduces the likelihood of "No Goal". Additionally, hosts average 4.5 shots on target vs 3.33 for the visitors, have seasonal xG 1.29 versus Club's 1.38, and despite lower finishing efficiency (7% vs 10%) the recent xG and chances conceded by the visitors increase the chance of goal exchange. On this basis I prioritize the BTTS - Yes option with a 70% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The calculated expected goals are 1.53 for Lommel (average of xG attack 1.29 and opponent xG defense 1.77) and 1.62 for Club Brugge II (average of xG attack 1.38 and opponent xG defense 1.85), giving a total of 3.15 expected goals. The 3.15 total exceeds the league average of 2.82, and season-long over 1.5 rates are 75% for Lommel and 80% for Club Brugge II, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5 (~82%). Club Brugge II have 73% of matches over 2.5 goals, Lommel 44%; additionally, in the last 5 matches Lommel scored 9 goals (1.8 average) with xG 1.98, which increases the probability for Over 2.5 (≈61%). Shot statistics show 4.5 on-target for Lommel and 3.33 for Club Brugge II with conversion rates of 7% vs 10%, indicating moderate finishing but sufficient potential for at least 2–3 goals. Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal (highest probability), while Over 2.5 is a justified secondary option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the break and a home win after the match (X/1). I expect a draw at the break because the home side averages 0.25 goals by half-time versus 0.27 for the away side; the home team led at the break in 3 matches (19%) while the visitors only in 1 (7%); and the hosts have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 56% of games — together these factors increase the probability of a stalemate at the break (hosts draw at half-time in 38% of matches, visitors in 47%). After the break I anticipate scoring activity — the hosts have 81% of matches with at least one goal after the interval, the visitors 80% — and in the last five matches the hosts average 1.6 points per game versus 0.4 for the visitors, indicating Lommel’s superiority in second halves. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (4.5 versus 3.33) and have comparable xG (1.29 versus 1.38), so the home team has more opportunities and conditions to turn the score around after half-time. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to the X/1 scenario, with a lower likelihood for an all-match draw or an away win, as the visitors have only 7% wins this season and average 0.4 points in their last five matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lommel United | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lommel United is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.4 pts / game - Club Brugge II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lommel United is 87% better for: goals scored per game.
1.93 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.03 goals / game - Club Brugge II
Lommel United is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.77 goals / game - Club Brugge II
Lommel United scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 meczów), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 meczów).
Club Brugge II scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lommel United
Over / Under - Club Brugge II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lommel United is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.81 pts / game - Club Brugge II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lommel United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Club Brugge II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lommel United
Club Brugge II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Lommel United | Liga | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.37 | 2.83 | • 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Lommel United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Club Brugge II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
Lommel United score 1.93 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.03. The First Division B average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Lommel United's matches and 58% of Club Brugge II's.
What form are Lommel United and Club Brugge II in?
Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Club Brugge II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


