Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 13, 2026

Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: match statistics

Lommel United crest
Lommel United
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II

Lommel United vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lommel United played against Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Lommel United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Club Brugge II has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Lommel United scores 1.93 goals per game and allows 1.43. Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Lommel United's games and 58% of Club Brugge II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 58%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lommel United has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.33 per game. Lommel United takes 15.4 shots per game, while Club Brugge II takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Lommel United leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 1.10 goals per game after halftime. Club Brugge II leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.77 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lommel United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Club Brugge II, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (Lommel United): they have a 53% home win rate and sit 4th in the table, while Club Brugge II have only a 7% away win rate and are 16th. Offensively Lommel average 1.93 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.86 and 5.93 shots on target per game, whereas Club Brugge II score 1.20 goals away with xG 1.38 and 3.33 shots on target. Defensively the hosts concede 1.27 goals per home match versus 1.8 conceded by the visitors away; this season the visitors have let in 55 goals compared to the hosts’ 43, giving Lommel a clear defensive edge. Trends reinforce the home advantage: in the last 5 matches Lommel have scored 9 goals and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss with an average 1.6 points per game, while Club Brugge II have scored 5 goals, have no wins in their last 5 and average 0.4 points per game. Considering better quality of chances (xG 1.86 vs 1.38), higher share of shots on target and greater conversion (12% vs 10%), and a lower share of goalless home matches for the hosts (13% vs 20%), I assess probabilities as: home 70%, draw 20%, away 10%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The "both teams to score" scenario looks more likely: Club Brugge II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 73% versus Lommel's 44%, while the league average BTTS is 54%. In Lommel's last 5 matches BTTS is 80%, they average 1.8 goals and generate xG 1.98 per game, whereas Club Brugge II in their last five matches concede on average 1.6 goals and have xG against of 2.35, indicating clear chances created and allowed by both sides. Season-long both teams concede heavily: Lommel on average 1.75 goals per match, Club Brugge II 1.8 goals, and the clean sheet expected rate is only 13% for both teams, which reduces the likelihood of "No Goal". Additionally, hosts average 4.5 shots on target vs 3.33 for the visitors, have seasonal xG 1.29 versus Club's 1.38, and despite lower finishing efficiency (7% vs 10%) the recent xG and chances conceded by the visitors increase the chance of goal exchange. On this basis I prioritize the BTTS - Yes option with a 70% probability.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The calculated expected goals are 1.53 for Lommel (average of xG attack 1.29 and opponent xG defense 1.77) and 1.62 for Club Brugge II (average of xG attack 1.38 and opponent xG defense 1.85), giving a total of 3.15 expected goals. The 3.15 total exceeds the league average of 2.82, and season-long over 1.5 rates are 75% for Lommel and 80% for Club Brugge II, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5 (~82%). Club Brugge II have 73% of matches over 2.5 goals, Lommel 44%; additionally, in the last 5 matches Lommel scored 9 goals (1.8 average) with xG 1.98, which increases the probability for Over 2.5 (≈61%). Shot statistics show 4.5 on-target for Lommel and 3.33 for Club Brugge II with conversion rates of 7% vs 10%, indicating moderate finishing but sufficient potential for at least 2–3 goals. Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 line as the strongest signal (highest probability), while Over 2.5 is a justified secondary option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the break and a home win after the match (X/1). I expect a draw at the break because the home side averages 0.25 goals by half-time versus 0.27 for the away side; the home team led at the break in 3 matches (19%) while the visitors only in 1 (7%); and the hosts have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 56% of games — together these factors increase the probability of a stalemate at the break (hosts draw at half-time in 38% of matches, visitors in 47%). After the break I anticipate scoring activity — the hosts have 81% of matches with at least one goal after the interval, the visitors 80% — and in the last five matches the hosts average 1.6 points per game versus 0.4 for the visitors, indicating Lommel’s superiority in second halves. Additionally, the hosts register more shots on target (4.5 versus 3.33) and have comparable xG (1.29 versus 1.38), so the home team has more opportunities and conditions to turn the score around after half-time. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to the X/1 scenario, with a lower likelihood for an all-match draw or an away win, as the visitors have only 7% wins this season and average 0.4 points in their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
22Shots13
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6Shots on target7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
2.21xG1.56
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
5Corners7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
57Dangerous attacks34
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
15Fouls7
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1Cards1
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.93Goals scored / game1.03
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.43Goals allowed / game1.77
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
55%Average possession56%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6.07Shots on target / game3.94
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.43Shots per game11.65
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
6.07Shots on target3.94
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
12.5%Shot conversion8.9%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
55%Possession56%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.77xG for1.33
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.3xG against1.81
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Shooting quality

Lommel United: DominantClub Brugge II: Balanced
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lommel United is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.4 pts / game - Club Brugge II

Lommel United
LDDWW
Season result split
50% W27% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-7
1.77 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.98Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Club Brugge II
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W19% D68% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-21
0.58 pts / game · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 2.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 87% better for: goals scored per game.

1.93 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.03 goals / game - Club Brugge II

Lommel United is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.43 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.77 goals / game - Club Brugge II

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 83% of games (25 of 30 meczów), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 meczów).

Club Brugge II scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge II scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).

58Goals scored (season)32
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
43Goals conceded (season)55
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
3.37Average goals per game2.81
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal68%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
70%2 goals29%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
33%3 goals6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
7%4 goals0%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal87%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
47%2 goals58%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
13%3 goals23%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
7%4 goals6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time10%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
13%BTTS in both halves6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
37%Scored in both halves13%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
80%BTTS - last 560%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lommel United is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.81 pts / game - Club Brugge II

Lommel United - half-time state
37% leading40% draw23% trailing
Club Brugge II - half-time state
13% leading42% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)0.81
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.26
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.43Average goals (1st half)0.97
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
53%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
43%No goal before half-time77%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per game (2nd half)0.97
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
1.93Average goals (2nd half)1.84
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
43%Clean sheet after half-time32%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II
37%No goal after half-time42%
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge II

Lommel United - second-half results

40% W37% D23% L
45
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Club Brugge II - second-half results

16% W48% D35% L
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lommel United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Club Brugge II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.60
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
9
5
16-30
11
10
31-45
9
11
46-60
9
6
61-75
15
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
5
3
16-30
2
10
31-45
6
8
46-60
10
16
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaClub Brugge II
Average goals per game 3.372.83 2.81
Both teams scored 63%54% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%53% 58%
Clean sheets 23%26% 13%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 65%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+4%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lommel UnitedYellow cardJhon Andersson Banguera Riascos
  2. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Naïm AmengaiOff: Jessi Silva
  3. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Siebe WylinOff: Mohamed Galal Elbay
  4. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Alexander ReumersOff: Mohamed Salah El Boukammiri
  5. Club Brugge IIGoalYanis Musuayi
  6. Club Brugge IIYellow cardGianluca Tommaso Okon-Engstler

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Arne De BeuckelaerMatches officiated: 15
4.53Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 220%Home wins40%Draws40%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Lommel United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Club Brugge II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Club Brugge KV II
0 : 2
Lommel United

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

Lommel United score 1.93 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.03. The First Division B average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Lommel United's matches and 58% of Club Brugge II's.

What form are Lommel United and Club Brugge II in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Club Brugge II 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs Club Brugge II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.