Lommel United vs KAA Gent II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lommel United played against KAA Gent II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on December 12, 2025. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Lommel United has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. KAA Gent II has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Lommel United scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.60. KAA Gent II scores 1.27 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Lommel United's games and 40% of KAA Gent II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 47%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lommel United has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.48 per game. Lommel United takes 16.5 shots per game, while KAA Gent II takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Lommel United leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.53 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lommel United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For KAA Gent II, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
7Shots17
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
4Shots on target3
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.14xG1.94
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1Corners7
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
57Dangerous attacks92
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
9Fouls11
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
0Cards1
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
2Goals scored / game1.27
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.6Goals allowed / game1.27
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
55%Average possession57%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
6.47Shots on target / game4.13
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.47Shots per game11.87
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
6.47Shots on target4.13
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
12.1%Shot conversion10.7%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
55%Possession57%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.84xG for1.48
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.32xG against1.49
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Shooting quality

Lommel United: DominantKAA Gent II: Balanced
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KAA Gent II is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Lommel United · 1.4 pts / game - KAA Gent II

Lommel United
LDDLW
Season result split
40% W33% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-4
1.53 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
KAA Gent II
WWDLL
Season result split
33% W20% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 57% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.27 goals / game - KAA Gent II

KAA Gent II is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.27 goals / game - KAA Gent II

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).

KAA Gent II scoring profile: strong

KAA Gent II scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).

30Goals scored (season)19
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
24Goals conceded (season)19
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
3.6Average goals per game2.53
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
11Goals scored (last 5)6
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
13Goals conceded (last 5)6
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal60%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
73%2 goals40%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
33%3 goals13%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
7%4 goals13%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal67%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
53%2 goals40%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
20%3 goals20%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
13%4 goals0%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time13%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
53%Scored in both halves33%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
100%BTTS - last 560%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KAA Gent II is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - Lommel United · 1.6 pts / game - KAA Gent II

Lommel United - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing
KAA Gent II - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)1.6
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.2
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
40%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
40%No goal before half-time53%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per game (2nd half)1.2
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
2.2Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II
20%No goal after half-time53%
Lommel UnitedKAA Gent II

Lommel United - second-half results

53% W27% D20% L
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KAA Gent II - second-half results

27% W40% D33% L
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lommel United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game1.21.4
Average goals per game2.22.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
KAA Gent II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
8
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaKAA Gent II
Average goals per game 3.602.73 2.53
Both teams scored 67%53% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%50% 47%
Clean sheets 27%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 87%74% 60%
Goal after half-time 87%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lommel UnitedGoalJason van DuivenAssist: Sam de Grand
  2. Lommel UnitedGoalRalf SeuntjensAssist: Jason van Duiven
  3. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Zalán VancsaOff: Mohamed Salah El Boukammiri
  4. KAA Gent IIYellow cardAbubakar Idris Abdullahi
  5. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Lucas schoofsOff: Jason van Duiven
  6. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Nicolas RommensOff: Lautaro López
  7. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Gyano VanderdonckOff: David Mukuna-Trouet
  8. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: John Edwin Montaño PreciadoOff: Ralf Seuntjens
  9. KAA Gent IISubstitutionOn: Simon BuggeaOff: Ruslan Vydysh

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs KAA Gent II?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 2:0 KAA Gent II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs KAA Gent II?

Lommel United score 2.00 goals per game on average and KAA Gent II 1.27. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Lommel United's matches and 40% of KAA Gent II's.

What form are Lommel United and KAA Gent II in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KAA Gent II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs KAA Gent II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.