Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: match statistics
Lommel United displays significantly better form and statistics than RFC Seraing. The hosts occupy 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, while the visitors are in 15th position with only 4 wins this season. In home matches, Lommel has a 55% win rate and averages 2 goals per game, achieving a positive goal difference of +8. RFC Seraing wins only 8% of their away matches, has a negative goal difference of -11, and fails to score in as many as 58% of their games. Additionally, the hosts boast much better offensive statistics (49 goals this season vs 22) and a higher average xG (1.85 vs 1.39), which confirms their qualitative superiority. The form of both teams in the last 5 matches also favors Lommel United (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses vs 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses).
Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lommel United played against RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 1, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Lommel United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. RFC Seraing has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Lommel United scores 1.96 goals per game and allows 1.44. RFC Seraing scores 0.92 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of Lommel United's games and 50% of RFC Seraing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lommel United has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.39 per game. Lommel United takes 14.9 shots per game, while RFC Seraing takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Lommel United leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.08 goals per game after halftime. RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 4% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lommel United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For RFC Seraing, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lommel United displays significantly better form and statistics than RFC Seraing. The hosts occupy 3rd place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, while the visitors are in 15th position with only 4 wins this season. In home matches, Lommel has a 55% win rate and averages 2 goals per game, achieving a positive goal difference of +8. RFC Seraing wins only 8% of their away matches, has a negative goal difference of -11, and fails to score in as many as 58% of their games. Additionally, the hosts boast much better offensive statistics (49 goals this season vs 22) and a higher average xG (1.85 vs 1.39), which confirms their qualitative superiority. The form of both teams in the last 5 matches also favors Lommel United (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses vs 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lommel United | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lommel United is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.8 pts / game - RFC Seraing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lommel United is 113% better for: goals scored per game.
1.96 goals / game - Lommel United · 0.92 goals / game - RFC Seraing
Lommel United is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.44 goals / game - Lommel United · 1.54 goals / game - RFC Seraing
Lommel United scores in 84% of games (21 of 25 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).
RFC Seraing scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lommel United
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lommel United is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - Lommel United · 0.67 pts / game - RFC Seraing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lommel United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lommel United
RFC Seraing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Lommel United | Liga | RFC Seraing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.40 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 51% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 26% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 72% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Lommel United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against RFC Seraing. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?
The First Division B match finished Lommel United 0:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?
Lommel United score 1.96 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 0.92. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Lommel United's matches and 50% of RFC Seraing's.
What form are Lommel United and RFC Seraing in?
Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs RFC Seraing?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lommel United vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.