Belgium - First Division BData current as of 16 July 2026

Lommel United vs RWDM: match statistics

Lommel United crest
Lommel United
3 : 2half-time 0:0
RWDM crest
RWDM

Lommel United vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lommel United play RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Lommel United: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lommel United scores 1.94 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lommel United 64%, RWDM 63%. Over 2.5: Lommel United 64%, RWDM 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Lommel United has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.33. Lommel United: 14.8 shots per match, RWDM: 11.5.

Match halves

Lommel United: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.06. RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Lommel United: 76-90+ (17 goals). RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Lommel United has a clear offensive edge at home: on average 1.86 goals per game and average xG 1.88 with 16.43 shots and 6 SOT per match, while RWDM on the road scores 1.5 goals with xG 1.3 from 11.57 shots and 4.07 shots on target. Despite a higher conversion rate for the visitors (13% vs 11% for the hosts), Lommel’s greater volume of chances (more shots and SOT) gives them superiority in both quality and quantity of opportunities. Defensively the hosts concede 1.21 goals at home with xG against 1.26, whereas RWDM concede 1.36 goals away with xG against 1.52; both teams have conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches, but the higher xG against for the visitors indicates greater defensive risk for RWDM. Form and stability: over the last 5 matches Lommel averages 1.6 points per game (2-2-1), RWDM 1.2 points (1-3-1), and the hosts fail to score less often (shutout in 14% of matches vs 21% for the visitors). Considering a 50% home win rate for the hosts and Lommel’s positive home goal difference of +9 versus the visitors’ +2 on the road, I recommend a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Lommel UnitedRWDM
14Shots5
Lommel UnitedRWDM
5Shots on target3
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.58xG0.75
Lommel UnitedRWDM
6Corners3
Lommel UnitedRWDM
46Dangerous attacks29
Lommel UnitedRWDM
10Fouls12
Lommel UnitedRWDM
2Cards1
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.94Goals scored / match1.56
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.36Goals conceded / match1.69
Lommel UnitedRWDM
54%Average possession48%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
5.83Shots on target / match4.38
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.81Shots per match11.5
Lommel UnitedRWDM
5.83Shots on target4.38
Lommel UnitedRWDM
13.1%Shot conversion13.6%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
54%Possession48%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.69xG for1.33
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.38xG against1.54
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Shooting quality

Lommel United: AttackingRWDM: Efficient finishing
Lommel UnitedRWDM
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lommel United is 200% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Lommel United · 0.8 pts / match - RWDM

Lommel United
LWWWW
Season result split
53% W22% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-8-9
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.56 goals / match - RWDM

Lommel United is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Lommel United · 1.69 goals / match - RWDM

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

70Goals scored (season)50
Lommel UnitedRWDM
49Goals conceded (season)54
Lommel UnitedRWDM
3.31Average goals in match3.25
Lommel UnitedRWDM
12Goals scored (last 5)8
Lommel UnitedRWDM
5Goals conceded (last 5)11
Lommel UnitedRWDM

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal81%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
69%2 goals50%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
36%3 goals19%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
6%4 goals3%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
42%2 goals53%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
11%3 goals31%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
6%4 goals6%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time25%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
11%BTTS in both halves13%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
36%Scored in both halves34%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lommel United is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / match - Lommel United · 1.41 pts / match - RWDM

Lommel United - half-time state
39% leading42% draw19% trailing
RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)1.41
Lommel UnitedRWDM
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Lommel UnitedRWDM
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.38
Lommel UnitedRWDM
53%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
42%No goal before half-time41%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.16
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.06Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Lommel UnitedRWDM
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
Lommel UnitedRWDM
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Lommel UnitedRWDM
44%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Lommel UnitedRWDM
39%No goal after half-time44%
Lommel UnitedRWDM

Lommel United - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
57
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lommel United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
11
7
16-30
12
10
31-45
11
12
46-60
10
6
61-75
17
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.59
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lommel UnitedLigaRWDM
Average goals in match 3.312.84 3.25
Both teams scored 64%55% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%54% 59%
Clean sheets 22%26% 22%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lommel United 0 - 1 - 0 RWDM. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47
3 : 3
Lommel United

FAQ

What was the result of Lommel United vs RWDM?

The First Division B match finished Lommel United 3:2 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lommel United vs RWDM?

Lommel United score 1.94 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.56. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lommel United's matches and 63% of RWDM's.

What form are Lommel United and RWDM in?

Over the last 5 games Lommel United have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and RWDM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lommel United vs RWDM?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.