United States - MLSBMO StadiumData current as of September 08, 2026

Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: match statistics

Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Los Angeles FC played against Real Salt Lake in MLS (United States). The game was played on July 23, 2026. Venue: BMO Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Los Angeles FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Real Salt Lake has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Los Angeles FC scores 1.69 goals per game and allows 1.06. Real Salt Lake scores 1.86 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 3.29 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 38% of Los Angeles FC's games and 71% of Real Salt Lake's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 71%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Real Salt Lake has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.60 per game. Los Angeles FC takes 14.2 shots per game, while Real Salt Lake takes 15.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Los Angeles FC leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Real Salt Lake leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

Los Angeles FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Real Salt Lake, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.29 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Los Angeles FC wins 63% of matches at home, scores 1.88 goals and concedes 1.00 goal per game on average, giving them a home goal difference of +7 and 75% clean sheets. The hosts average 14.13 shots per game, including 4.5 on target, with a conversion rate of around 13%, confirming offensive efficiency at home. Real Salt Lake have only a 17% win rate on the road, score 1.33 goals and concede 1.83 goals per away match, with a 0% clean sheet rate and a conversion of about 11% from 12.33 shots per game. Although the visitors have better short-term form (2.0 points per game and 3 wins in the last 5 versus LAFC’s 1.2 points and 2 wins), xG metrics favor the hosts: xG for LAFC is 1.59 versus 1.33 for RSL, and xG against is 1.42 versus 1.49. Based on this, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a high BTTS rate: Los Angeles FC has 63% of matches with both teams scoring, and Real Salt Lake 83%, while the league average is 61% — a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches BTTS rates are 60% for LA and 80% for RSL, and Real Salt Lake has 0% clean sheets this season versus 25% for LA, which increases the likelihood that both teams will find the net. Looking at chance creation, LA scores 2.25 goals on average (xG 1.93) and records 7.25 shots on target and 17.25 shots per game, while RSL has 1.33 goals (xG 1.33) with 4.17 shots on target and 12.33 shots; this means both sides have realistic scoring opportunities. Defensively LA concedes 1.0 goal on average (xG against 1.29), while RSL concedes 1.83 goals (xG against 1.49), so the visitors statistically allow more goal-scoring situations. Based on this I assign a 78% probability to BTTS 'yes' and 22% to 'no', because the combination of 63% vs 83% season BTTS, 60% vs 80% in the last 5 matches, RSL's lack of clean sheets and solid xG figures (1.93 vs 1.33) creates the strongest signal for Both Teams To Score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis indicates high goal potential: Los Angeles FC averages 2.25 goals at home (xG 1.93), while Real Salt Lake concedes 1.83 goals away (xG against 1.49); based on this I estimate 1.72 goals for LAFC and 1.30 for RSL, totaling 3.02. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals — LAFC 100% and RSL 83% — and solid over 2.5 rates: LAFC 75% and RSL 67%, with both sides registering over 2.5 in 80% of their last 5 matches. Additionally, the league average is 3.3 goals per game, LAFC averages 17.25 shots (7.25 on target) and RSL 12.33 (4.17 on target), which supports a projection of at least three goals. Combined xG for both teams is 1.93+1.33=3.26, and the fact that both teams have scored in 63% and 83% of matches respectively confirms a tendency for goal exchange. For these reasons the best line to play is Over 2.5 (estimated 75%), while Over 1.5 is nearly certain (~92%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Los Angeles FC led at half-time in 4 matches (50%) and were level at half-time in 4 (50%), never trailing at half-time (0%), which strongly indicates a home advantage in the first half. Over full matches LAFC win at home in 88% of games, score on average 2.25 goals and concede 1.00, while Real Salt Lake have only a 17% win rate, 1.33 goals scored and 1.83 conceded per match. The xG rate is 1.93 for LAFC versus 1.33 for RSL, and the home side records more shots on target (7.25 vs 4.17); at half-time LAFC average 1.25 goals and concede 0.38, which favors maintaining a lead. Although the season BTTS rates are 63% for the hosts and 83% for the visitors, the home team’s low average goals conceded by half-time (0.38) and high home efficiency (88% wins) make the most likely scenario a lead at 45' and a full-time victory for LAFC (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

29Possession (%)71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
12Shots28
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
3Shots on target6
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.24xG2.72
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
7Corners12
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
39Dangerous attacks77
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
5Fouls7
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0Cards0
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.69Goals scored / game1.86
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.06Goals allowed / game1.36
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
48%Average possession50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
4.75Shots on target / game5.93
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.19Shots per game15.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
4.75Shots on target5.93
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
11.9%Shot conversion12.3%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
48%Possession50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.6xG for1.68
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.36xG against1.37
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Shooting quality

Los Angeles FC: AttackingReal Salt Lake: Attacking
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Real Salt Lake is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Los Angeles FC · 2 pts / game - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC
LLLWW
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Real Salt Lake
WLWWD
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Real Salt Lake is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.69 goals / game - Los Angeles FC · 1.86 goals / game - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.06 goals / game - Los Angeles FC · 1.36 goals / game - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Real Salt Lake keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).

Real Salt Lake scoring profile: mixed

Real Salt Lake scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 63% (10 of 16 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)26
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
17Goals conceded (season)19
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
2.75Average goals per game3.21
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
8Goals scored (last 5)9
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal86%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
44%2 goals64%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%3 goals29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
6%4 goals7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

How often they concede at least...

38%1 goal86%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
38%2 goals43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%3 goals7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
13%4 goals0%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
6%BTTS in both halves7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%Scored in both halves36%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
60%BTTS - last 560%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Real Salt Lake is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / game - Los Angeles FC · 1.79 pts / game - Real Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing
Real Salt Lake - half-time state
43% leading50% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per game (1st half)1.79
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.69Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
69%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
63%No goal before half-time29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

After half-time (2nd half)

1.88Points per game (2nd half)1.14
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
63%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake
25%No goal after half-time50%
Los Angeles FCReal Salt Lake

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

50% W38% R13% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Real Salt Lake - second-half results

29% W29% R43% P
25
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Los Angeles FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Real Salt Lake - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Real Salt Lake
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
5
1
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
76%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Real Salt Lake

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Los Angeles FCLigaReal Salt Lake
Average goals per game 2.753.29 3.21
Both teams scored 38%62% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%62% 71%
Clean sheets 63%22% 14%
Goal before half-time 56%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 81%80% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Los Angeles FCGoalHeung-Min SonAssist: Jacob Shaffelburg
  2. Los Angeles FCGoalDenis BouangaAssist: Mathieu Choiniere
  3. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Victor OlatunjiOff: Stijn Spierings
  4. Real Salt LakeGoalDeAndre Roselle Yedlin
  5. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Jeremy EbobisseOff: Heung-Min Son
  6. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Saba LobzhanidzeOff: Diego Luna
  7. Real Salt LakeSubstitutionOn: Alexandros KatranisOff: Juan Manuel Sanabria Magole
  8. Real Salt LakeGoalLukas Ahlefeld EngelAssist: Saba Lobzhanidze

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

The MLS match finished Los Angeles FC 3:1 Real Salt Lake. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

Los Angeles FC score 1.69 goals per game on average and Real Salt Lake 1.86. The MLS average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Los Angeles FC's matches and 71% of Real Salt Lake's.

What form are Los Angeles FC and Real Salt Lake in?

Over the last 5 games Los Angeles FC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Real Salt Lake 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Los Angeles FC vs Real Salt Lake: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.