Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of September 11, 2026

Luzern vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Luzern crest
Luzern
4 : 3half-time 2:2
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
135%(2.00)
X35%(3.65)
230%(3.47)

The match promises to be a balanced clash between two teams from the bottom part of the table, occupying 10th and 11th place respectively. Luzern presents very poor home form with just a 9% win rate at home and a goal difference of -2, although they average 2 goals scored per match in front of their own crowd. Grasshopper has an even worse away record with 18% wins and a goal difference of -10, yet in the last five matches overall they have earned more points (1.2 PPG) than Luzern (0.6 PPG). Both teams are characterized by a high number of draws – Luzern 45% at home, Grasshopper 27% away – and weak defenses, suggesting an entertaining match with goals. Considering the poor form of both squads, a slight statistical advantage for the hosts in possession and efficiency, and the better recent form of the visitors, a draw seems the most likely outcome, with a slight edge for the hosts due to home advantage.

Luzern vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Luzern played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on February 10, 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Recent form

Luzern has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Grasshopper has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Luzern scores 1.74 goals per game and allows 1.87. Grasshopper scores 1.30 and allows 1.78. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 74% of Luzern's games and 65% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 74% and 52%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Luzern has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.46 per game. Luzern takes 14.0 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Luzern leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.74 after halftime.

When the teams score

Luzern's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be a balanced clash between two teams from the bottom part of the table, occupying 10th and 11th place respectively. Luzern presents very poor home form with just a 9% win rate at home and a goal difference of -2, although they average 2 goals scored per match in front of their own crowd. Grasshopper has an even worse away record with 18% wins and a goal difference of -10, yet in the last five matches overall they have earned more points (1.2 PPG) than Luzern (0.6 PPG). Both teams are characterized by a high number of draws – Luzern 45% at home, Grasshopper 27% away – and weak defenses, suggesting an entertaining match with goals. Considering the poor form of both squads, a slight statistical advantage for the hosts in possession and efficiency, and the better recent form of the visitors, a draw seems the most likely outcome, with a slight edge for the hosts due to home advantage.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 2
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
LuzernGrasshopper
19Shots13
LuzernGrasshopper
6Shots on target4
LuzernGrasshopper
2.02xG1.33
LuzernGrasshopper
5Corners3
LuzernGrasshopper
56Dangerous attacks31
LuzernGrasshopper
2Fouls6
LuzernGrasshopper
2Cards4
LuzernGrasshopper

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

LuzernGrasshopper
1.74Goals scored / game1.3
LuzernGrasshopper
1.87Goals allowed / game1.78
LuzernGrasshopper
49%Average possession45%
LuzernGrasshopper
4.17Shots on target / game4.57
LuzernGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14Shots per game12.78
LuzernGrasshopper
4.17Shots on target4.57
LuzernGrasshopper
12.4%Shot conversion10.2%
LuzernGrasshopper
49%Possession45%
LuzernGrasshopper
1.51xG for1.46
LuzernGrasshopper
1.68xG against1.59
LuzernGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Luzern: AttackingGrasshopper: Balanced
LuzernGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)30%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Luzern is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Luzern · 0.6 pts / game - Grasshopper

Luzern
WLDDD
Season result split
22% W39% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-9
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Grasshopper
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
17% W35% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-11
0.87 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Luzern is 34% better for: goals scored per game.

1.74 goals / game - Luzern · 1.3 goals / game - Grasshopper

Grasshopper is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.87 goals / game - Luzern · 1.78 goals / game - Grasshopper

Luzern scoring profile: very strong

Luzern scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 meczów).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Luzern keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).

40Goals scored (season)30
LuzernGrasshopper
43Goals conceded (season)41
LuzernGrasshopper
3.61Average goals per game3.09
LuzernGrasshopper
9Goals scored (last 5)5
LuzernGrasshopper
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
LuzernGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal74%
LuzernGrasshopper
52%2 goals26%
LuzernGrasshopper
17%3 goals17%
LuzernGrasshopper
9%4 goals4%
LuzernGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal91%
LuzernGrasshopper
70%2 goals43%
LuzernGrasshopper
22%3 goals22%
LuzernGrasshopper
9%4 goals9%
LuzernGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

67%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
LuzernGrasshopper
4%BTTS in both halves9%
LuzernGrasshopper
26%Scored in both halves22%
LuzernGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
LuzernGrasshopper
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
LuzernGrasshopper
60%BTTS - last 5100%
LuzernGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
LuzernGrasshopper
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
LuzernGrasshopper
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
LuzernGrasshopper

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
LuzernGrasshopper
74%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
LuzernGrasshopper
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
LuzernGrasshopper

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Luzern is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / game - Luzern · 1.17 pts / game - Grasshopper

Luzern - half-time state
30% leading48% draw22% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
26% leading39% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per game (1st half)1.17
LuzernGrasshopper
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.57
LuzernGrasshopper
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
LuzernGrasshopper
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.39
LuzernGrasshopper
61%Clean sheet before half-time43%
LuzernGrasshopper
48%No goal before half-time61%
LuzernGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per game (2nd half)1.04
LuzernGrasshopper
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
LuzernGrasshopper
1.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
LuzernGrasshopper
2.17Average goals (2nd half)1.7
LuzernGrasshopper
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
LuzernGrasshopper
39%No goal after half-time43%
LuzernGrasshopper

Luzern - second-half results

22% W30% D48% L
32
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Grasshopper - second-half results

22% W39% D39% L
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Luzern - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Grasshopper - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Luzern
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
10
31-45
3
12
46-60
10
10
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
2
9
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
6
13
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.34
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Luzern

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

LuzernLigaGrasshopper
Average goals per game 3.613.28 3.09
Both teams scored 74%67% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 74%66% 52%
Clean sheets 17%19% 9%
Goal before half-time 70%75% 74%
Goal after half-time 87%82% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / game
1.52
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GrasshopperGoalTim Meyer
  2. LuzernYellow cardVars Villiger
  3. GrasshopperGoalLuke Plange
  4. GrasshopperYellow cardSalifou Diarrassouba
  5. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Mouhamed El Bachir NgomOff: Salifou Diarrassouba
  6. GrasshopperYellow cardAbdoulaye Diaby
  7. GrasshopperGoalSven Köhler
  8. GrasshopperGoalSimone Stroscio
  9. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Young-Jun LeeOff: Luke Plange
  10. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Hassane ImouraneOff: Tim Meyer
  11. GrasshopperYellow cardYoung-Jun Lee
  12. LuzernGoalSeverin Ottiger
  13. LuzernSubstitutionOn: Adrian GrbicOff: Julian Vonmoos
  14. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Samuel MarquesOff: Simone Stroscio
  15. GrasshopperYellow cardMouhamed El Bachir Ngom
  16. LuzernYellow cardPascal David Loretz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Luzern's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Grasshopper. Games average 5.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FC Luzern
6 : 0
Grasshopper Club Zürich
Grasshopper Club Zürich
2 : 3
FC Luzern

FAQ

What was the result of Luzern vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Luzern 4:3 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Luzern and Grasshopper?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Luzern won 2, Grasshopper won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Luzern vs Grasshopper?

Luzern score 1.74 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.30. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Luzern's matches and 65% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Luzern and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Luzern have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Grasshopper 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Luzern vs Grasshopper?

The statistical background for Luzern vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.