Denmark - SuperligaLyngby StadionData current as of September 12, 2026

Lyngby vs AGF: match statistics

Lyngby crest
Lyngby
2 : 2half-time 0:1
AGF crest
AGF

Lyngby vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lyngby played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on August 1, 2026. Venue: Lyngby Stadion. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Lyngby has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. AGF has 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Lyngby scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 3.00. AGF scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Lyngby's games and 100% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 83% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lyngby has the higher season xG average, 2.11 to 1.47 per game. Lyngby takes 21.0 shots per game, while AGF takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Lyngby leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lyngby's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 83% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win — AGF. AGF scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches versus Lyngby’s 8, indicating a clear offensive advantage for the visitors. The visitors have a form line of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss in their last five fixtures and average 2.0 points per game, while the hosts have 2 wins and 3 losses and average 1.2 points per game, confirming the form gap. Defensively AGF conceded 7 goals in those 5 matches and Lyngby 8, so a slight defensive edge also favors AGF; additionally AGF sits 4th in the table versus Lyngby’s 11th position. Lack of detailed xG and shot data forces reliance on goals scored and conceded, therefore I assess chances as 60% for the visitors, 25% for a draw and 15% for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes selection appears more likely due to a high league BTTS rate of 83% and Lyngby’s seasonal BTTS rate of 100% (AGF seasonal data are zero and less reliable). In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS in 60% each: Lyngby averages 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, AGF averages 2.8 scored and 1.4 conceded, indicating goal exchange from both sides. xG over the last 5 matches is 1.85 for Lyngby and 1.61 for AGF, with xG against at 1.32 and 1.51 respectively, meaning both sides create and concede chances. Additionally, Lyngby have scored 8 and conceded 8 in their last five fixtures, while AGF have scored 14 and conceded 7, confirming the offensive nature of their games. Based on this I assess BTTS - Yes at 78% and No Goal at 22%, therefore I recommend taking Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project Lyngby to score approximately 1.68 goals and AGF about 1.47 goals, giving a total of 3.15 goals. These values come from comparing the last 5 matches: Lyngby has an average xG of 1.85, AGF conceded an average of 1.51 xG in those games, while AGF generates 1.61 xG against Lyngby’s defense at 1.32 xG. The expected 3.15 goals is 0.65 above the 2.5 line, and both teams recorded 60% of matches over 2.5 goals in their last 5 fixtures, so Over 2.5 has a clear edge. Additionally, Lyngby at home averages 13 shots and 3 shots on target per match; seasonally 100% of their home games exceeded 1.5 goals and in 100% of home matches both teams scored, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Based on this, I recommend betting Over 2.5 as the optimal line: the projected 3.15 goals and the historical 60% Over 2.5 rate across the last 5 matches for both teams provide the strongest and most consistent signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches AGF have led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and scored an average of 1.2 goals by half-time, while Lyngby average 0.8 goals per half. After 90 minutes the visitors have won 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5) versus Lyngby’s 40% wins (2 of 5), and the average goals in the last 5 matches are 4.2 for AGF vs 3.2 for Lyngby, indicating an offensive advantage for the visitors. Additionally, in the league 83% of matches finish with both teams scoring (BTTS 83%), which increases the chance of a goalscoring game and decreases the likelihood of a goalless draw. Taking this into account, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning at full-time (2/2) — historically AGF led at the break and won the match in 3 of 5 cases, so I assign the highest probability to this scenario. The second strongest option is a draw at half-time and an AGF victory at full-time (X/2) due to the average half-time goals of 0.8–1.2 and the high league goal percentage; I assign lower probability to scenarios with a Lyngby lead or a full-time draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
LyngbyAGF
21Shots8
LyngbyAGF
8Shots on target3
LyngbyAGF
2.45xG0.94
LyngbyAGF
4Corners2
LyngbyAGF
79Dangerous attacks30
LyngbyAGF
19Fouls14
LyngbyAGF
2Cards3
LyngbyAGF

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1
LyngbyAGF
3Goals allowed / game1
LyngbyAGF
42%Average possession54%
LyngbyAGF
6Shots on target / game3
LyngbyAGF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

21Shots per game13
LyngbyAGF
6Shots on target3
LyngbyAGF
9.5%Shot conversion7.7%
LyngbyAGF
42%Possession54%
LyngbyAGF
2.11xG for1.47
LyngbyAGF
1.47xG against1.28
LyngbyAGF

Shooting quality

Lyngby: AttackingAGF: Balanced
LyngbyAGF
Accuracy (shots on target)29%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lyngby
L
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
AGF
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lyngby is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Lyngby · 1 goals / game - AGF

AGF is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

3 goals / game - Lyngby · 1 goals / game - AGF

Lyngby scoring profile: very strong

Lyngby scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

2Goals scored (season)1
LyngbyAGF
3Goals conceded (season)1
LyngbyAGF
5Average goals per game2
LyngbyAGF
2Goals scored (last 5)1
LyngbyAGF
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
LyngbyAGF

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
LyngbyAGF
100%2 goals0%
LyngbyAGF
0%3 goals0%
LyngbyAGF
0%4 goals0%
LyngbyAGF

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
LyngbyAGF
100%2 goals0%
LyngbyAGF
100%3 goals0%
LyngbyAGF
0%4 goals0%
LyngbyAGF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

100%BTTS at half-time0%
LyngbyAGF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LyngbyAGF
0%Scored in both halves0%
LyngbyAGF

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
LyngbyAGF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LyngbyAGF
100%BTTS - last 5100%
LyngbyAGF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
LyngbyAGF
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
LyngbyAGF
100%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LyngbyAGF

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
LyngbyAGF
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
LyngbyAGF
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LyngbyAGF

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lyngby is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / game - Lyngby · 1 pts / game - AGF

Lyngby - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
AGF - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per game (1st half)1
LyngbyAGF
2Goals scored (1st half)0
LyngbyAGF
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
LyngbyAGF
3Average goals (1st half)0
LyngbyAGF
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
LyngbyAGF
0%No goal before half-time100%
LyngbyAGF

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)1
LyngbyAGF
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
LyngbyAGF
2Goals conceded (2nd half)1
LyngbyAGF
2Average goals (2nd half)2
LyngbyAGF
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
LyngbyAGF
100%No goal after half-time0%
LyngbyAGF

Lyngby - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGF - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lyngby - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.000.00
Goals scored / game2.00.0
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game3.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals100%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 2
AGF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lyngby
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

AGF
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lyngby

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
226%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-2.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

LyngbyLigaAGF
Average goals per game 5.002.83 2.00
Both teams scored 100%83% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%33% 0%
Clean sheets 0%8% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%67% 0%
Goal after half-time 100%67% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
83%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
8%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
67%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
17%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AGFSubstitutionOn: Eric KahlOff: Frederik Tingager
  2. LyngbyYellow cardSimon Colyn
  3. LyngbyYellow cardIsak Thorvaldsson
  4. AGFSubstitutionOn: Rasmus CarstensenOff: Oskar Skou Haugstrup
  5. AGFYellow cardChristian Storch
  6. LyngbySubstitutionOn: Frederik GytkjærOff: Isak Thorvaldsson
  7. AGFYellow cardMouhammade Camara
  8. AGFSubstitutionOn: Magnus KnudsenOff: Mouhammade Camara
  9. AGFGoalJens JønssonAssist: Frederik Emmery Søgaard

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Lyngby vs AGF?

The Superliga match finished Lyngby 2:2 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lyngby vs AGF?

Lyngby score 2.00 goals per game on average and AGF 1.00. The Superliga average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Lyngby's matches and 100% of AGF's.

What form are Lyngby and AGF in?

Over the last 5 games Lyngby have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and AGF 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lyngby vs AGF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lyngby vs AGF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.