Lyngby vs Hvidovre: match statistics
Lyngby vs Hvidovre: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lyngby played against Hvidovre in 1st Division (Denmark). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Lyngby has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Hvidovre has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Lyngby scores 2.17 goals per game and allows 1.13. Hvidovre scores 1.46 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Lyngby's games and 58% of Hvidovre's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lyngby has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.41 per game. Lyngby takes 14.0 shots per game, while Hvidovre takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Lyngby leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. Hvidovre leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lyngby's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Hvidovre, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1st Division games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lyngby and Hvidovre occupy 1st and 2nd respectively, but Lyngby’s superiority is evident in attack: the hosts have scored 52 goals this season versus Hvidovre’s 35 and have 13 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 7. At home Lyngby averages 2.17 goals per game, registers 5.5 shots on target and has a 15% conversion rate, while Hvidovre away posts 1.42 goals, 4.17 shots on target and 11% conversion, which gives the hosts a clear offensive edge. Defensively both teams concede 0.92 goals on average, but Hvidovre allow higher expected goals against on the road (xG against 1.38 vs 1.07 for Lyngby), meaning opponents create more high-quality chances against them. Form also favors Lyngby — 2.0 points per game in the last 5 matches versus 1.6 for Hvidovre — and the hosts fail to score in only 8% of matches, while the visitors are goalless in 25% of cases. Considering the better xG (1.78 vs 1.41), higher number of shots on target and superior conversion, I predict a Lyngby victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Lyngby has a season BTTS rate of 75% (80% in the last 5), while Hvidovre records 42% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, giving a stronger 'Both Teams To Score' signal from the home side. Hosts average 1.5 goals per game this season and as much as 2.6 in the last 5, while visitors average 1.42 seasonally and 1.4 in the last 5, so Lyngby have the offensive edge (2.6 vs 1.4 in the last 5). Both teams have similar attacking xG at 1.41 each, and opponents concede xG of 1.25 (Lyngby) and 1.38 (Hvidovre), which suggests both home and away have realistic chances to score. The counterargument is Hvidovre’s defense — they concede 0.92 goals seasonally and have 42% clean sheets versus Lyngby’s 1.17 conceded and 25% clean sheets, which reduces BTTS probability, but does not eliminate the home side’s advantage in goal metrics. Considering the 75%/80% signal from Lyngby, balanced xG and higher home productivity in the last 5, I price BTTS at 63% vs 37% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal xG values are 1.41 for Lyngby and 1.41 for Hvidovre, with xG conceded at 1.25 (Lyngby) and 1.38 (Hvidovre), resulting in expected goals of 1.40 for the home side and 1.33 for the away side, totaling 2.73. With a combined expected score of 2.73, a Poisson distribution indicates the probability of at least 2 goals is ~76% and at least 3 goals is ~52%, therefore Over 1.5 and Over 2.5 are favoured. Lyngby have scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per game) and 80% of those fixtures featured over 2.5 goals, while Hvidovre have 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4), which supports the expected goals total. Season-to-date the share of matches over 1.5 goals is 83% for Lyngby and 67% for Hvidovre, and the share of BTTS matches is 75% and 42% respectively, further backing Over 1.5. Accordingly, I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (line: 1.5, side: over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Lyngby more often leads at the break — 42% of matches (5 occurrences) — and averages 0.92 goals in the first half versus 0.58 for Hvidovre, giving the home side an advantage at HT. However, Hvidovre is stronger after the break: in second halves they average 1.58 points and win second halves in 42% of cases, and seasonally the visitors have won 58% of matches versus Lyngby’s 25% wins. Additionally, Hvidovre scored 7 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to Lyngby’s 3, indicating frequent late turnarounds, while both teams have similar xG (1.41 vs 1.41). In this context the strongest signal is the scenario of Lyngby leading at half-time and Hvidovre winning after 90 minutes, so I choose 1/2 as the main bet.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lyngby | Hvidovre | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lyngby is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Lyngby · 1.6 pts / game - Hvidovre
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lyngby is 49% better for: goals scored per game.
2.17 goals / game - Lyngby · 1.46 goals / game - Hvidovre
Hvidovre is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Lyngby · 1.04 goals / game - Hvidovre
Lyngby scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 meczów), while Hvidovre keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
Hvidovre scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while Lyngby keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lyngby
Over / Under - Hvidovre
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lyngby - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Hvidovre - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lyngby
Hvidovre
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Lyngby | Liga | Hvidovre | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.29 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 71% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Lyngby's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Hvidovre. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Lyngby vs Hvidovre?
The 1st Division match finished Lyngby 2:1 Hvidovre. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lyngby and Hvidovre?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lyngby won 0, Hvidovre won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lyngby vs Hvidovre?
Lyngby score 2.17 goals per game on average and Hvidovre 1.46. The 1st Division average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Lyngby's matches and 58% of Hvidovre's.
What form are Lyngby and Hvidovre in?
Over the last 5 games Lyngby have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Hvidovre 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lyngby vs Hvidovre?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.