Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta demonstrates significantly better form and performance metrics this season. They sit 6th in the table with 7 wins, while Madura United is placed 13th with just 4 victories. The hosts' form is particularly concerning, having earned only 0.8 points per match in their last 5 games with just one win, whereas the visitors are achieving 1.6 points per match. PSIM Yogyakarta has a better away record (38% wins, 38% draws) than Madura United's home record (25% wins, 50% losses). Additionally, the visitors display higher average possession (56% vs 53%) and superior xG stats. Taking all factors into account, PSIM Yogyakarta holds the advantage, although the difficulty of away fixtures and the comparable number of goals conceded by both teams do not preclude a draw.
Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Madura United played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Madura United has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Madura United scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.31. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.25 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Madura United's games and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 38%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.23 per game. Madura United takes 10.1 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Madura United leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.81 after halftime.
When the teams score
Madura United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIM Yogyakarta demonstrates significantly better form and performance metrics this season. They sit 6th in the table with 7 wins, while Madura United is placed 13th with just 4 victories. The hosts' form is particularly concerning, having earned only 0.8 points per match in their last 5 games with just one win, whereas the visitors are achieving 1.6 points per match. PSIM Yogyakarta has a better away record (38% wins, 38% draws) than Madura United's home record (25% wins, 50% losses). Additionally, the visitors display higher average possession (56% vs 53%) and superior xG stats. Taking all factors into account, PSIM Yogyakarta holds the advantage, although the difficulty of away fixtures and the comparable number of goals conceded by both teams do not preclude a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Madura United | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Madura United · 1.6 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Madura United · 1.25 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
PSIM Yogyakarta is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Madura United · 1.13 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Madura United scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Madura United keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Madura United
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Madura United is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Madura United · 1.25 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Madura United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Madura United
PSIM Yogyakarta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Madura United | Liga | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.44 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 66% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 84% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
The Liga 1 match finished Madura United 0:3 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
Madura United score 1.13 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.25. The Liga 1 average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Madura United's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.
What form are Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta in?
Over the last 5 games Madura United have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
The statistical background for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.