Malavan vs Tractor Sazi: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a balanced matchup with a draw being the favored outcome. Malavan demonstrates solid home form with 50% wins and only 20% losses at their own ground, but their attack is limited (averaging 1 goal per game). Tractor Sazi occupies a higher league position and boasts a better goal difference (+5 in away matches), yet a significant 50% of their away fixtures end in draws, which is a crucial factor. The away side holds an edge in possession (52% vs 45%) and has a superior xG (1.54 vs 1.05), but their form in the last five away games has been inconsistent. Considering the defensive solidity of both sides (Malavan with 40% clean sheets at home, Tractor Sazi with 70% away) and the visitors' propensity for draws on the road, the most likely result is a draw.
Malavan vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Malavan played against Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Malavan has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Tractor Sazi has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Malavan scores 0.62 goals per game and allows 0.71. Tractor Sazi scores 1.25 and allows 0.55. Games in this league average 1.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 24% of Malavan's games and 40% of Tractor Sazi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 19% and 40%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 28% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tractor Sazi has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 0.68 per game. Malavan takes 0.9 shots per game, while Tractor Sazi takes 2.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Malavan leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Tractor Sazi leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Malavan's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Tractor Sazi, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.79 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 28% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a balanced matchup with a draw being the favored outcome. Malavan demonstrates solid home form with 50% wins and only 20% losses at their own ground, but their attack is limited (averaging 1 goal per game). Tractor Sazi occupies a higher league position and boasts a better goal difference (+5 in away matches), yet a significant 50% of their away fixtures end in draws, which is a crucial factor. The away side holds an edge in possession (52% vs 45%) and has a superior xG (1.54 vs 1.05), but their form in the last five away games has been inconsistent. Considering the defensive solidity of both sides (Malavan with 40% clean sheets at home, Tractor Sazi with 70% away) and the visitors' propensity for draws on the road, the most likely result is a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Malavan | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -20% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 1.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tractor Sazi is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Malavan · 2 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tractor Sazi is 102% better for: goals scored per game.
0.62 goals / game - Malavan · 1.25 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Tractor Sazi is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Malavan · 0.55 goals / game - Tractor Sazi
Malavan scores in 48% of games (10 of 21 meczów), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 55% (11 of 20 meczów).
Tractor Sazi scores in 55% of games (11 of 20 meczów), while Malavan keeps a clean sheet in 52% (11 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Malavan
Over / Under - Tractor Sazi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tractor Sazi is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Malavan · 1.5 pts / game - Tractor Sazi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Malavan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Tractor Sazi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Malavan
Tractor Sazi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Malavan | Liga | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.33 | 1.79 | • 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 41% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 52% | 62% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Malavan's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Tractor Sazi. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Malavan vs Tractor Sazi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Malavan 1:1 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Malavan vs Tractor Sazi?
Malavan score 0.62 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.25. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 24% of Malavan's matches and 40% of Tractor Sazi's.
What form are Malavan and Tractor Sazi in?
Over the last 5 games Malavan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Malavan vs Tractor Sazi?
The statistical background for Malavan vs Tractor Sazi — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.