Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: match statistics
Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Manchester United played against Nottingham Forest in Premier League (England). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Manchester United has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Nottingham Forest has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Manchester United scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.33. Nottingham Forest scores 1.25 and allows 1.31. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 72% of Manchester United's games and 44% of Nottingham Forest's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 53%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Manchester United has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.44 per game. Manchester United takes 15.4 shots per game, while Nottingham Forest takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Manchester United leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 1.03 goals per game after halftime. Nottingham Forest leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Manchester United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Nottingham Forest, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premier League games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I tip 1 — Manchester United to win. The hosts have won 67% of their home matches and average 2.00 goals per home game, while Nottingham Forest as visitors average 1.44 goals and only 39% away wins. United create better chances: home xG is 1.95 versus Forest’s 1.22 xG on the road, and shots on target are 6.78 for United vs 4.22 for the visitors. Defensively Manchester concedes 1.22 goals at home on average, while Forest concedes 1.39 away; additionally Forest fail to score in 28% of away matches compared to 11% of United’s home games, which increases the hosts’ chances. Although Forest have scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus United’s 7 and both teams have 3 wins in their last 5 (averaging 2 points per game), Manchester’s superiority in chance creation and game control at Old Trafford gives them a higher probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 44% each, while the league average BTTS is 55%; in the last 5 matches Man United recorded BTTS 60% versus Nottingham’s 40%, which slightly favors the "both teams to score" scenario. United generate xG 1.66 per match but actually score only 1.06 goals per match with a low conversion rate of 7%, indicating the hosts create chances (xG 1.66) but are often inefficient. Conversely Nottingham have xG_for 1.22 and xG_against 1.62, score 1.44 goals per match on average, and scored 10 goals in their last 5 fixtures (2.0 per match) with a conversion rate of 14%, so the visitors are capable of finishing. Clean sheets for both teams are uncommon (United 22%, Nottingham 28%) and the league averages 2.76 goals per match, which reduces the likelihood of No Goal outcomes. On this basis I assess BTTS at 60% (Yes) and 40% (No) as the best pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Season xG are 1.66 for Manchester and 1.22 for Nottingham, giving a combined xG of ~2.90, which points to almost 3 expected goals in the match. Manchester averages 15 shots (3.94 on target), Nottingham 10 shots (4.22 on target); with conversion rates of 7% for the home side versus 14% for the visitors, the away team is more efficient in turning chances into goals (seasonal goals per match 1.06 vs 1.44). Over statistics show Manchester with 72% of matches Over 1.5 goals, Nottingham 89%, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams have 60% of matches Over 2.5, increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. A model based on the combined xG of 2.90 translates to estimates of approximately 79% for Over 1.5, ~55% for Over 2.5 and ~33% for Over 3.5. Given the high Over 1.5 rates (72% vs 89%), low clean sheet rates (22% and 28%) and combined xG ~2.9, I recommend a bet on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with an away win at full-time (X/2). The home side drew at half-time in 61% of their matches and score on average 0.39 goals by the break, while the visitors average 0.61 goals before half-time and lead at the break in 28% of games. The visitors dominate after the break — they earn an average of 1.67 points in second halves and win second halves in 44% of cases, compared to 1.06 points and 22% second-half wins for the hosts. Additionally, the visitors have a higher shot conversion rate (14% vs. 7% for the hosts) and average 4.22 shots on target per match versus 3.94, and the hosts concede many late goals (the hosts conceded 10 goals in the 76–90' window, the visitors scored 7 in that period), which favors a turnaround after half-time. On this basis I assigned the highest probability to X/2 (26%), with the next most likely outcomes being X/X (20%) and 2/2 (20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Manchester United | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nottingham Forest is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Manchester United · 2.2 pts / game - Nottingham Forest
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Manchester United is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.75 goals / game - Manchester United · 1.25 goals / game - Nottingham Forest
Manchester United scores in 89% of games (32 of 36 meczów), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 meczów).
Nottingham Forest scores in 61% of games (22 of 36 meczów), while Manchester United keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Manchester United
Over / Under - Nottingham Forest
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Manchester United is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - Manchester United · 0.97 pts / game - Nottingham Forest
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Manchester United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Nottingham Forest - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Manchester United
Nottingham Forest
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Manchester United | Liga | Nottingham Forest | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.08 | 2.76 | ▼ 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 72% | 55% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 79% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Manchester United's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Nottingham Forest. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
The Premier League match finished Manchester United 3:2 Nottingham Forest. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
Manchester United score 1.75 goals per game on average and Nottingham Forest 1.25. The Premier League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 72% of Manchester United's matches and 44% of Nottingham Forest's.
What form are Manchester United and Nottingham Forest in?
Over the last 5 games Manchester United have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Nottingham Forest 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Manchester United vs Nottingham Forest?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


