Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC: match statistics
Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Maroons played against Entebbe UPPC in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on May 12, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Maroons has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Entebbe UPPC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Maroons scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 0.89. Entebbe UPPC scores 0.93 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 2.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Maroons's games and 22% of Entebbe UPPC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 15%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Entebbe UPPC has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.22 per game. Maroons takes 8.3 shots per game, while Entebbe UPPC takes 5.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Maroons leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.37 goals per game after halftime. Entebbe UPPC leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.19 after halftime.
When the teams score
Maroons's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Entebbe UPPC, it is minutes 0-15 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.07 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maroons are difficult to beat at home: they concede only 0.31 goals per home match on average and keep a clean sheet in 69% of appearances, with a home goal difference of +11. At their ground they average 9.75 shots and 3.17 on target per match, have a higher shot conversion of 12%, which translates to 1.15 goals scored and an offensive xG of 1.28. Entebbe UPPC arrive in better recent form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and an average of 1.8 points per game) and also have 25 goals this season, but away they score 1.08 goals on average and concede 0.85 with an xG against of 1.68. The comparison shows even offensive potential (both 25 goals), but a home defensive advantage and superior chance quality for the hosts (more shots on target and higher conversion: 12% vs 7%), which favors Maroons. Therefore I give a slight edge to the hosts and predict a narrow Maroons victory, although Entebbe’s good form increases the risk of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - No. Maroons at home have a season BTTS of only 7% versus Entebbe’s 38% and a 37% league average. Maroons keep a clean sheet in 57% of home games, and 77% of league matches overall finish with at least one clean sheet, strongly favoring No Goal. Although home xG is 1.66 (xG against 1.54) and Maroons had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, low finishing efficiency (conversion rate 6% for hosts and 7% for visitors) and an average of 3 on-target shots versus 2 suggest chances rarely convert into goals. Entebbe’s season BTTS is 38% but only 20% in their last 5 matches, and they concede on average 0.85 goals per game, indicating moderate defensive stability. Considering the very low seasonal BTTS for the hosts (7%), high clean sheet rate (57%) and low shot conversion, I assess probability at 75% for No and 25% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis point to nearly 3 expected goals: Maroons have an offensive xG of 1.66 while Entebbe concedes an average xG of 1.68, yielding hosts ≈1.67; Entebbe’s offensive xG is 1.08 while Maroons concede xG 1.54, giving visitors ≈1.31, total 2.98 goals. A Poisson model based on this estimates probability of Over 1.5 goals at ~80%, Over 2.5 at ~57% and Over 3.5 at ~35%. Maroons create significantly more chances (avg. 13.38 shots and 3.0 shots on target vs. 7.0 and 2.0 for Entebbe), supporting a higher scoreline despite low shooting efficiency for the hosts (6%, guests 7%). Season-long >2.5 is rare for Maroons (7%) and moderate for Entebbe (23%), but in the last 5 matches the hosts have 80% of games with >2.5, confirming a short-term push towards the over. For these reasons the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (Over) as the recommended pick, while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Maroons led at the break in 44% of matches and average 0.56 goals by half-time, while Entebbe led at the break in 22% and average 0.44 first-half goals. Maroons clearly generate more chances: xG 1.66 versus 1.08 for Entebbe and 13.38 shots per game versus 7.0 for the visitors, which supports control and the ability to maintain a lead after the break. Maroons’ defense is tight in the second half – they concede on average 0.11 goals after half-time – and home matches finish with a clean sheet in 57% of cases versus 46% for Entebbe, so converting an HT lead into an FT win is likely. At the same time Entebbe have better form in the last 5 matches (60% wins vs 20% for Maroons) and draw at half-time more often (67%), hence a higher share of draw scenarios (X/X 23%) and possibilities of a turnaround. On this basis the strongest signal is 1/1 (Maroons lead at the break and win) with an assigned probability of 32%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Maroons | Entebbe UPPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 19% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.87 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Entebbe UPPC is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Maroons · 1.8 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Entebbe UPPC is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.89 goals / game - Maroons · 0.7 goals / game - Entebbe UPPC
Maroons scores in 56% of games (15 of 27 games), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 52% (14 of 27 games).
Entebbe UPPC scores in 59% of games (16 of 27 games), while Maroons keeps a clean sheet in 41% (11 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Maroons
Over / Under - Entebbe UPPC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Entebbe UPPC is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Maroons · 1.37 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Maroons - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Entebbe UPPC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Maroons
Entebbe UPPC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Maroons | Liga | Entebbe UPPC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.81 | 2.07 | ▼ 1.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 37% | ▼ 22% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 33% | 34% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 39% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 48% | 61% | ▼ 26% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Maroons's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Entebbe UPPC. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Maroons 0:0 Entebbe UPPC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC?
Maroons score 0.93 goals per game on average and Entebbe UPPC 0.93. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Maroons's matches and 22% of Entebbe UPPC's.
What form are Maroons and Entebbe UPPC in?
Over the last 5 games Maroons have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Entebbe UPPC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC?
The statistical background for Maroons vs Entebbe UPPC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.