Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 04, 2026

Mārupe vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Mārupe crest
Mārupe
0 : 4half-time 0:1
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

Mārupe vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mārupe played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Recent form

Mārupe has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Mārupe scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.25. Metta - LU scores 3.50 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 3.47 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's games and 58% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 83%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 2.86 to 1.53 per game. Mārupe takes 9.9 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 20.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Mārupe leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.42 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 83% and scores 1.42 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mārupe's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.47 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU are clear favorites: they sit 1st (10 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and have scored 42 goals this season, including 21 in the last 5 matches, while Mārupe have 6 wins and 22 goals overall and 7 goals in their last 5. Form underlines the gap — Metta have won 5 of their last 5 and are averaging 3 points per match in that run, whereas Mārupe have averaged 1.2 points in their last five and lost 3 of those 5. Metta create substantially more high-quality chances: away they average 19.25 shots and 8 on target with xG 2.47, while Mārupe at home average 11.6 shots and 5.2 on target with xG 1.62, which highlights Metta’s superiority in chance creation (2.47 xG vs 1.62 xG). Defensively Metta also perform better — conceding 0.8 goals on average away versus Mārupe’s 1.67 conceded at home and recording 40% clean sheets vs the hosts’ 33%. Considering the advantage in form, shot volume (19.25 vs 11.6), xG (2.47 vs 1.62) and goal balance (42–11 vs 22–15), I forecast an away win; I allocate probabilities: home 10%, draw 20%, away 70%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a high BTTS rate this season: Mārupe 57% and Metta 60%, while the league BTTS rate is 62%, which initially favors a Goal/Goal outcome. The signal is even stronger over the last 5 matches — Mārupe has BTTS in 60% of those games and Metta in 80%, with average goals of 1.4 (Mārupe) and 4.2 (Metta) in that period. Creativity metrics confirm an attacking profile: season xG is 3.08 for Mārupe and 2.47 for Metta, and shots on target per match are 14.0 vs 8.0, with conversion rates of 18% and 13%. At the same time, neither team is defensively airtight — season goals conceded are 1.0 (Mārupe) and 0.8 (Metta), and in the last 5 matches they concede 1.6 and 1.2 goals respectively, increasing the likelihood of both sides scoring. Considering the seasonal 57%/60%, last 5 matches 60%/80%, high xG 3.08 vs 2.47 and frequent shots on target, I tip BTTS - Yes with an 80% probability.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect Mārupe to score about 2.03 goals and Metta - LU about 1.53 goals, totaling 3.56 goals. This projection is supported by xG: Mārupe xG_for 3.08 vs Metta xG_against 0.97 and Metta xG_for 2.47 vs Mārupe xG_against 0.60, indicating a clear attacking edge for the home side. Seasonal metrics show Mārupe has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Metta 80%, and the over 2.5 percentages are 86% for Mārupe and 80% for Metta; the league averages 3.48 goals per match. Additionally, Metta averages 4.2 goals in the last 5 matches (gf_last5=21) with last5 xG_for 2.54, while Mārupe averages 14.0 shots on target with an 18% conversion rate (vs 8.0 and 13% for Metta), which increases the probability of further goals. The strongest signal is therefore the over 1.5 line, as the historical 100%/80% for over1.5 combined with an expected 3.56 goals gives a clear edge to that option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is 1/1: I assign this scenario a 40% probability. Mārupe led at the break in 6 of 7 matches (86%) and scores an average of 2.43 goals in the first half with 0.0 conceded, while Metta - LU has 1.5 HT goals and 0.25 first-half concessions. Over the full match Mārupe averages 4.29 goals per game versus Metta’s 2.4, xG 3.08 versus 2.47, 14 shots on target versus 8 and 23.86 total shots versus 19.25, which supports holding the lead through to full-time. Nevertheless Metta are in excellent form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and have led at the break in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), so I also assign moderate chances to draw and turnaround scenarios after the interval (1/X 12%, X/X 10%, X/2 10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 3
Second half

Game stats

36Possession (%)64
MārupeMetta - LU
5Shots19
MārupeMetta - LU
2Shots on target10
MārupeMetta - LU
0.69xG2.49
MārupeMetta - LU
2Corners7
MārupeMetta - LU
31Dangerous attacks83
MārupeMetta - LU
18Fouls13
MārupeMetta - LU
0Cards0
MārupeMetta - LU

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MārupeMetta - LU
1.83Goals scored / game3.5
MārupeMetta - LU
1.25Goals allowed / game0.92
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Average possession55%
MārupeMetta - LU
4.5Shots on target / game10.75
MārupeMetta - LU

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.92Shots per game20.25
MārupeMetta - LU
4.5Shots on target10.75
MārupeMetta - LU
18.5%Shot conversion17.3%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Possession55%
MārupeMetta - LU
1.53xG for2.86
MārupeMetta - LU
1.06xG against0.74
MārupeMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Mārupe: Efficient finishingMetta - LU: Dominant
MārupeMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)45%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Metta - LU is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Mārupe · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU

Mārupe
WLLLW
Season result split
50% W8% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-5
1.58 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Metta - LU
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
83% W8% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-1
2.58 pts / game · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.26Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 91% better for: goals scored per game.

1.83 goals / game - Mārupe · 3.5 goals / game - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - Mārupe · 0.92 goals / game - Metta - LU

Mārupe scoring profile: strong

Mārupe scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)42
MārupeMetta - LU
15Goals conceded (season)11
MārupeMetta - LU
3.08Average goals per game4.42
MārupeMetta - LU
8Goals scored (last 5)19
MārupeMetta - LU
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
MārupeMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal100%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%2 goals83%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%3 goals67%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%4 goals33%
MārupeMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal58%
MārupeMetta - LU
42%2 goals25%
MārupeMetta - LU
17%3 goals8%
MārupeMetta - LU
8%4 goals0%
MārupeMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
MārupeMetta - LU
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MārupeMetta - LU
17%Scored in both halves75%
MārupeMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
MārupeMetta - LU
60%BTTS - last 5100%
MārupeMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
MārupeMetta - LU
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
MārupeMetta - LU
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
MārupeMetta - LU

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
MārupeMetta - LU
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
MārupeMetta - LU

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 128% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Mārupe · 2.67 pts / game - Metta - LU

Mārupe - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
83% leading17% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)2.67
MārupeMetta - LU
0.42Goals scored (1st half)1.92
MārupeMetta - LU
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.08
MārupeMetta - LU
0.92Average goals (1st half)2
MārupeMetta - LU
58%Clean sheet before half-time92%
MārupeMetta - LU
67%No goal before half-time17%
MārupeMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

1.42Points per game (2nd half)1.83
MārupeMetta - LU
1.42Goals scored (2nd half)1.42
MārupeMetta - LU
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
MārupeMetta - LU
2.17Average goals (2nd half)2.08
MārupeMetta - LU
50%Clean sheet after half-time58%
MārupeMetta - LU
33%No goal after half-time17%
MārupeMetta - LU

Mārupe - second-half results

42% W17% R42% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Metta - LU - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
32
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+22
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 83% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mārupe - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Metta - LU - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.20
Goals scored / game2.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.01.2
Average goals per game2.22.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+110
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mārupe
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
5
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
7
1
16-30
10
0
31-45
3
5
46-60
4
1
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mārupe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
220%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

MārupeLigaMetta - LU
Average goals per game 3.083.47 4.42
Both teams scored 50%62% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%68% 83%
Clean sheets 42%22% 42%
Goal before half-time 67%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 92%85% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.47
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / game
1.59
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 0:4 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

Mārupe score 1.83 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.50. The 1. Liga average is 3.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 58% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Mārupe and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Metta - LU?

The statistical background for Mārupe vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.