Mārupe vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Mārupe vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mārupe played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Final score: 0:4.
Recent form
Mārupe has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Mārupe scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 1.25. Metta - LU scores 3.50 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 3.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's games and 58% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 83%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 2.86 to 1.53 per game. Mārupe takes 9.9 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 20.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Mārupe leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.42 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 83% and scores 1.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mārupe's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.47 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU are clear favorites: they sit 1st (10 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss) and have scored 42 goals this season, including 21 in the last 5 matches, while Mārupe have 6 wins and 22 goals overall and 7 goals in their last 5. Form underlines the gap — Metta have won 5 of their last 5 and are averaging 3 points per match in that run, whereas Mārupe have averaged 1.2 points in their last five and lost 3 of those 5. Metta create substantially more high-quality chances: away they average 19.25 shots and 8 on target with xG 2.47, while Mārupe at home average 11.6 shots and 5.2 on target with xG 1.62, which highlights Metta’s superiority in chance creation (2.47 xG vs 1.62 xG). Defensively Metta also perform better — conceding 0.8 goals on average away versus Mārupe’s 1.67 conceded at home and recording 40% clean sheets vs the hosts’ 33%. Considering the advantage in form, shot volume (19.25 vs 11.6), xG (2.47 vs 1.62) and goal balance (42–11 vs 22–15), I forecast an away win; I allocate probabilities: home 10%, draw 20%, away 70%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a high BTTS rate this season: Mārupe 57% and Metta 60%, while the league BTTS rate is 62%, which initially favors a Goal/Goal outcome. The signal is even stronger over the last 5 matches — Mārupe has BTTS in 60% of those games and Metta in 80%, with average goals of 1.4 (Mārupe) and 4.2 (Metta) in that period. Creativity metrics confirm an attacking profile: season xG is 3.08 for Mārupe and 2.47 for Metta, and shots on target per match are 14.0 vs 8.0, with conversion rates of 18% and 13%. At the same time, neither team is defensively airtight — season goals conceded are 1.0 (Mārupe) and 0.8 (Metta), and in the last 5 matches they concede 1.6 and 1.2 goals respectively, increasing the likelihood of both sides scoring. Considering the seasonal 57%/60%, last 5 matches 60%/80%, high xG 3.08 vs 2.47 and frequent shots on target, I tip BTTS - Yes with an 80% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect Mārupe to score about 2.03 goals and Metta - LU about 1.53 goals, totaling 3.56 goals. This projection is supported by xG: Mārupe xG_for 3.08 vs Metta xG_against 0.97 and Metta xG_for 2.47 vs Mārupe xG_against 0.60, indicating a clear attacking edge for the home side. Seasonal metrics show Mārupe has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Metta 80%, and the over 2.5 percentages are 86% for Mārupe and 80% for Metta; the league averages 3.48 goals per match. Additionally, Metta averages 4.2 goals in the last 5 matches (gf_last5=21) with last5 xG_for 2.54, while Mārupe averages 14.0 shots on target with an 18% conversion rate (vs 8.0 and 13% for Metta), which increases the probability of further goals. The strongest signal is therefore the over 1.5 line, as the historical 100%/80% for over1.5 combined with an expected 3.56 goals gives a clear edge to that option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is 1/1: I assign this scenario a 40% probability. Mārupe led at the break in 6 of 7 matches (86%) and scores an average of 2.43 goals in the first half with 0.0 conceded, while Metta - LU has 1.5 HT goals and 0.25 first-half concessions. Over the full match Mārupe averages 4.29 goals per game versus Metta’s 2.4, xG 3.08 versus 2.47, 14 shots on target versus 8 and 23.86 total shots versus 19.25, which supports holding the lead through to full-time. Nevertheless Metta are in excellent form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and have led at the break in 4 of their last 5 fixtures (80%), so I also assign moderate chances to draw and turnaround scenarios after the interval (1/X 12%, X/X 10%, X/2 10%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mārupe | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Mārupe · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 91% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - Mārupe · 3.5 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Mārupe · 0.92 goals / game - Metta - LU
Mārupe scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mārupe
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 128% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Mārupe · 2.67 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 83% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +11 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mārupe
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Mārupe | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.08 | 3.47 | ▲ 4.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 62% | ▼ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 68% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 22% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 0:4 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
Mārupe score 1.83 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 3.50. The 1. Liga average is 3.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Mārupe's matches and 58% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Mārupe and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Metta - LU?
The statistical background for Mārupe vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


