Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mārupe played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on May 23, 2026. Final score: 1:4.
Recent form
Mārupe has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Mārupe scores 2.25 goals per game and allows 0.75. Rīgas FS II scores 0.88 and allows 2.50. Games in this league average 3.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Mārupe's games and 50% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 75%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mārupe has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.19 per game. Mārupe takes 13.0 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Mārupe leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.75 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mārupe's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.43 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mārupe is the clear favorite: at home they average 3.33 goals with 15.67 shots per game, of which 6 are on target, while Rīgas FS II away average 0 goals with 7.67 shots and 1.67 shots on target; the visitors have failed to score on the road (100% of away matches without a goal). In their last five matches Mārupe scored 10 goals and won 3 of 5, averaging 1.8 points per game, whereas Rīgas FS II managed only 2 goals and failed to win any of their last five (0–1–4), averaging 0.2 points per game. The difference in chance quality is confirmed by xG: Mārupe’s home xG is 2.01 versus the visitors’ 1.05 away xG, indicating more clear-cut opportunities created by the hosts. The hosts also have better efficiency – shot conversion 21% for Mārupe versus 0% conversion for the visitors on the road – and a stronger defense: Mārupe concede 1.0 goals at home with 67% clean sheets, while Rīgas FS II concede 2.0 goals away and have only 33% clean sheets. Considering a 67% home win rate for the hosts and no away wins for the visitors, I am backing a Mārupe victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess the BTTS - Yes scenario as more likely (70% vs 30%) because key indicators favor both teams scoring. Mārupe has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% and at home has not kept a clean sheet yet (0%), conceding on average 2.8 goals per game with xG against 2.24, indicating high susceptibility to conceding. Rīgas FS II formally has a seasonal BTTS 0% and averages 0.0 goals scored away, but their away xG is 1.05, and in the last 5 matches their xG for is 1.02 with an actual average of 0.4 goals and 2 goals scored overall — the visitors create chances but finish them poorly. Additionally, Mārupe has scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per game) and conceded 6 (1.2 per game); the league has 59% of matches with BTTS and an average of 3.43 goals. The home team has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals and in 80% of cases both over 2.5 and BTTS, which strengthens the scenario that both teams will find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Mārupe have averaged 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches with an average xG of 1.6, while Rīgas FS II have averaged 0.4 goals in their last 5 with xG 1.02, indicating a clear home advantage in chance creation. Mārupe have 100% of home games over 1.5 and over 2.5 goals this season, whereas the visitors have 67% of away games over 1.5 and only 33% over 2.5; the league averages 3.43 goals per match. Combining recent xG to calculate expected goals gives for the hosts (1.6 and xG conceded by the visitors 1.75) (1.6+1.75)/2 = 1.68 expected goals, for the visitors (1.02 and xG conceded by the hosts 1.2) (1.02+1.2)/2 = 1.11; total = 2.79. With λ=2.79 the Poisson model returns ~77% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~53% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~31% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (77%) — corroborated by Mārupe’s 100% home matches over 1.5 and a superiority in on-target shots 3.8 vs 1.67 — therefore I recommend Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis shows Mārupe leads at the break in 3 of 5 matches (60%) and scores an average of 1.0 goal by half-time, while Rīgas FS II have not scored at half-time this season (0 goals, 0.0 average). Nonetheless the hosts suffer poor second halves: they concede an average of 2.4 goals after the break, with as many as 6 goals occurring between the 76th and 90th minutes and 80% of second halves ending in their defeat. The visitors register an xG of 1.05 per match and display low finishing efficiency (on average 1.67 shots on target and 0% conversion), which indicates they are capable of overturning a deficit in the second half against the hosts’ vulnerable defense. Consequently the strongest signal is the scenario of Mārupe leading at half-time, with Rīgas FS II winning by full-time (1/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mārupe | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mārupe is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Mārupe · 0.8 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mārupe is 156% better for: goals scored per game.
2.25 goals / game - Mārupe · 0.88 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Mārupe is 233% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Mārupe · 2.5 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Mārupe scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
Rīgas FS II scores in 50% of games (4 of 8 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mārupe
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 2.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mārupe
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Mārupe | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.43 | • 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 59% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 23% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mārupe's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished Mārupe 1:4 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Mārupe and Rīgas FS II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mārupe won 0, Rīgas FS II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II?
Mārupe score 2.25 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 0.88. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Mārupe's matches and 50% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are Mārupe and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games Mārupe have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II?
The statistical background for Mārupe vs Rīgas FS II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


