Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of September 20, 2026

Masar vs Proxy: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Masar vs Proxy: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Masar plays Proxy in Second Division (Egypt). The game is scheduled for September 24, 2026.

Recent form

Masar has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Proxy has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Masar scores 2.40 goals per game and allows 0.60. Proxy scores 0.40 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 1.98 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Masar's games and 0% of Proxy's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 20%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Masar has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.23 per game. Masar takes 11.0 shots per game, while Proxy takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Masar leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 1.60 goals per game after halftime. Proxy leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

Masar's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Proxy, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.98 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.4Goals scored / game0.4
MasarProxy
0.6Goals allowed / game1.2
MasarProxy
44%Average possession53%
MasarProxy
4.8Shots on target / game2.8
MasarProxy

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game10.4
MasarProxy
4.8Shots on target2.8
MasarProxy
21.8%Shot conversion3.8%
MasarProxy
44%Possession53%
MasarProxy
1.9xG for1.23
MasarProxy
0.62xG against1.35
MasarProxy

Shooting quality

Masar: Counter-attackingProxy: Balanced
MasarProxy
Accuracy (shots on target)44%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.14

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Masar is 333% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Masar · 0.6 pts / game - Proxy

Masar
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 0.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Proxy
LLWLL
Season result split
20% W0% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 500% better for: goals scored per game.

2.4 goals / game - Masar · 0.4 goals / game - Proxy

Masar is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.6 goals / game - Masar · 1.2 goals / game - Proxy

Masar scoring profile: very strong

Masar scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).

Proxy scoring profile: more difficult

Proxy scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).

12Goals scored (season)2
MasarProxy
3Goals conceded (season)6
MasarProxy
3Average goals per game1.6
MasarProxy
12Goals scored (last 5)2
MasarProxy
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
MasarProxy

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal20%
MasarProxy
60%2 goals20%
MasarProxy
60%3 goals0%
MasarProxy
20%4 goals0%
MasarProxy

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
MasarProxy
0%2 goals20%
MasarProxy
0%3 goals20%
MasarProxy
0%4 goals0%
MasarProxy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
MasarProxy
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MasarProxy
40%Scored in both halves20%
MasarProxy

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
MasarProxy
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
MasarProxy
60%BTTS - last 50%
MasarProxy

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
MasarProxy
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
MasarProxy
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MasarProxy

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
MasarProxy
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
MasarProxy
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
MasarProxy

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / game - Masar · 1 pts / game - Proxy

Masar - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Proxy - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per game (1st half)1
MasarProxy
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.2
MasarProxy
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
MasarProxy
1Average goals (1st half)0.8
MasarProxy
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MasarProxy
20%No goal before half-time80%
MasarProxy

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.8
MasarProxy
1.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
MasarProxy
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
MasarProxy
2Average goals (2nd half)0.8
MasarProxy
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
MasarProxy
40%No goal after half-time80%
MasarProxy

Masar - second-half results

60% W20% D20% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Proxy - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Masar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.00
Goals scored / game0.81.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Proxy - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Masar
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+96%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
211%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.83
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaProxy
Average goals per game 3.001.98 1.60
Both teams scored 60%44% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%34% 20%
Clean sheets 40%34% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%76% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.98
Average goals per game
44%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / game
0.84
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Masar's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Proxy. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

When do Masar and Proxy play?

Masar face Proxy on September 24, 2026 in Second Division. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Masar and Proxy?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Masar won 1, Proxy won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Proxy?

Masar score 2.40 goals per game on average and Proxy 0.40. The Second Division average is 1.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Masar's matches and 0% of Proxy's.

What form are Masar and Proxy in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Proxy 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Proxy?

The statistical background for Masar vs Proxy — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.