Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of October 16, 2026

Masar vs Tanta SC: match statistics

Masar crest
Masar
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Masar sits in 4th place in the table and has a clear advantage over Tanta SC (16th position). The hosts show solid defense at home with 50% clean sheets and an average of only 0.9 goals conceded per match. Tanta SC has very poor away form with just 9% wins and 55% draws, indicating difficulties in scoring goals on the road (average 0.64 goals). Despite Masar's weaker recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and better offensive statistics (31 goals in the season vs 15 for Tanta) speak for a home victory. Tanta's high percentage of away draws (55%) and the defensive style of play of the visitors increase the probability of a point split, but Masar's quality should prevail.

Masar vs Tanta SC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Masar played against Tanta SC in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on February 12, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Masar has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Tanta SC has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Masar scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 0.77. Tanta SC scores 0.68 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 1.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 36% of Masar's games and 55% of Tanta SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 18%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Masar has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.27 per game. Masar takes 8.2 shots per game, while Tanta SC takes 7.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Masar leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Tanta SC leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.27 after halftime.

When the teams score

Masar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Tanta SC, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 1.88 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Masar sits in 4th place in the table and has a clear advantage over Tanta SC (16th position). The hosts show solid defense at home with 50% clean sheets and an average of only 0.9 goals conceded per match. Tanta SC has very poor away form with just 9% wins and 55% draws, indicating difficulties in scoring goals on the road (average 0.64 goals). Despite Masar's weaker recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), their home advantage and better offensive statistics (31 goals in the season vs 15 for Tanta) speak for a home victory. Tanta's high percentage of away draws (55%) and the defensive style of play of the visitors increase the probability of a point split, but Masar's quality should prevail.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
MasarTanta SC
13Shots2
MasarTanta SC
2Shots on target0
MasarTanta SC
1.3xG0.42
MasarTanta SC
3Corners5
MasarTanta SC
46Dangerous attacks38
MasarTanta SC
13Fouls13
MasarTanta SC
0Cards0
MasarTanta SC

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.41Goals scored / game0.68
MasarTanta SC
0.77Goals allowed / game1.05
MasarTanta SC
43%Average possession45%
MasarTanta SC
3.05Shots on target / game3.18
MasarTanta SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.18Shots per game7.36
MasarTanta SC
3.05Shots on target3.18
MasarTanta SC
17.2%Shot conversion9.3%
MasarTanta SC
43%Possession45%
MasarTanta SC
1.33xG for1.27
MasarTanta SC
1.11xG against1.32
MasarTanta SC

Shooting quality

Masar: Counter-attackingTanta SC: Balanced
MasarTanta SC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Masar is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Masar · 0.8 pts / game - Tanta SC

Masar
WLDLD
Season result split
45% W32% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-5
1.68 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Tanta SC
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
9% W55% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-12-8
0.82 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-4
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masar is 107% better for: goals scored per game.

1.41 goals / game - Masar · 0.68 goals / game - Tanta SC

Masar is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.77 goals / game - Masar · 1.05 goals / game - Tanta SC

Masar scoring profile: very strong

Masar scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 games).

Tanta SC scoring profile: mixed

Tanta SC scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 games), while Masar keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 games).

31Goals scored (season)15
MasarTanta SC
17Goals conceded (season)23
MasarTanta SC
2.18Average goals per game1.73
MasarTanta SC
4Goals scored (last 5)4
MasarTanta SC
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
MasarTanta SC

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal59%
MasarTanta SC
32%2 goals5%
MasarTanta SC
18%3 goals5%
MasarTanta SC
14%4 goals0%
MasarTanta SC

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal77%
MasarTanta SC
18%2 goals23%
MasarTanta SC
5%3 goals5%
MasarTanta SC
0%4 goals0%
MasarTanta SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
MasarTanta SC
5%BTTS in both halves0%
MasarTanta SC
27%Scored in both halves5%
MasarTanta SC

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
MasarTanta SC
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
MasarTanta SC
60%BTTS - last 580%
MasarTanta SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
MasarTanta SC
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
MasarTanta SC
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
MasarTanta SC

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
MasarTanta SC
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
MasarTanta SC
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
MasarTanta SC

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masar is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / game - Masar · 1.18 pts / game - Tanta SC

Masar - half-time state
36% leading50% draw14% trailing
Tanta SC - half-time state
18% leading64% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per game (1st half)1.18
MasarTanta SC
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.41
MasarTanta SC
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
MasarTanta SC
0.91Average goals (1st half)0.77
MasarTanta SC
73%Clean sheet before half-time64%
MasarTanta SC
55%No goal before half-time64%
MasarTanta SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)0.86
MasarTanta SC
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
MasarTanta SC
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
MasarTanta SC
1.14Average goals (2nd half)0.95
MasarTanta SC
64%Clean sheet after half-time50%
MasarTanta SC
59%No goal after half-time73%
MasarTanta SC

Masar - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
35
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tanta SC - second-half results

14% W45% D41% L
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Masar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tanta SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Masar
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
1
46-60
5
1
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Masar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

MasarLigaTanta SC
Average goals per game▲ 2.181.88▼ 1.73
Both teams scored▼ 36%40%▲ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 27%30%▼ 18%
Clean sheets▲ 45%38%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time▲ 55%51%▲ 55%
Goal after half-time▲ 73%68%▼ 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.88
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.95
Home goals / game
0.93
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Masar's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tanta SC. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Tanta SC
0 : 2
Masar

FAQ

What was the result of Masar vs Tanta SC?

The Second Division match finished Masar 0:0 Tanta SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masar vs Tanta SC?

Masar score 1.41 goals per game on average and Tanta SC 0.68. The Second Division average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Masar's matches and 55% of Tanta SC's.

What form are Masar and Tanta SC in?

Over the last 5 games Masar have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tanta SC 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masar vs Tanta SC?

The statistical background for Masar vs Tanta SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.