Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueStadion im. Bahrom VafoyevData current as of September 07, 2026

Mash'al vs Nasaf: match statistics

Mash'al crest
Mash'al
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Nasaf crest
Nasaf

Mash'al vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Mash'al played against Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on July 22, 2026. Venue: Stadion im. Bahrom Vafoyev. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Mash'al has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Nasaf has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Mash'al scores 0.42 goals per game and allows 1.75. Nasaf scores 1.25 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Mash'al's games and 58% of Nasaf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 33%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.00 per game. Mash'al takes 8.0 shots per game, while Nasaf takes 12.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Mash'al leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Nasaf leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Mash'al's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Nasaf, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pick: 2 — away win. Nasaf has 4 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses with 15 goals scored over the season, while Mash'al has only 1 win, 0 draws and 11 losses with 5 goals, giving a clear advantage to the visitors in results and efficiency. In the last 5 matches Nasaf scored 14 goals and averages 2.2 points per game with a 3-2-0 record, whereas Mash'al scored 6 goals in their last 5 and averages 1.2 points per game with a 2-0-3 record. Mash'al’s home metrics are poor: 0.17 goals per home game, 83% of matches without scoring and a shot conversion of 2%, while Nasaf away records 1.67 goals per game, 0% of matches without a goal and a 15% conversion, with a higher volume of shots (11.33 vs 9.17) and shots on target (3.83 vs 2.83). Despite similar goals conceded averages (≈1.17), higher away xG for the visitors (1.33 vs 1.14) and a better away goal differential (+3 vs hosts’ -6) favor Nasaf; I estimate probabilities at ~72% for an away win, 18% draw and 10% home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal comes from Nasaf: their season BTTS on the road is 83%, while Mash'al at home is only 33%, indicating away matches frequently end Goal/Goal. In the last 5 matches both teams register BTTS at 60% (last 5: 60% for Mash'al and 60% for Nasaf); Nasaf scored 14 goals in those 5 matches (avg 2.8), and Mash'al scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 8 (1.6), so recent form favors goal exchanges. xG and shooting stats confirm this: Nasaf recently has xG_for 1.46 and on average 3.83 shots on target per match with a 15% conversion rate, while Mash'al in the last 5 matches concedes an average xG of 1.57. Although Mash'al has 50% clean sheets at home this season, they have scored only 5 goals and conceded 21 overall, and Nasaf on the road scores an average 1.67 goals (15 goals season), so Mash'al’s defense looks vulnerable to the visitors' offense. Considering the away season BTTS of 83%, 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches and the difference in recent goal form (2.8 vs 1.2), the 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) scenario appears more likely — I assess its probability at 75% versus 25% for 'No' (No Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects a total of 2.79 goals (home xG 1.44 vs away xG 1.35), indicating a high probability of Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches Mash'al averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Nasaf averaged 2.8 scored and 0.6 conceded, showing a clear offensive advantage for the visitors. Seasonal stats confirm the asymmetry — Nasaf have 100% of matches Over 1.5, Mash'al 33%, and both teams have 60% Over 2.5 in their last 5 games, hence a moderate chance for Over 2.5 (~53%). The percentage of matches with Both Teams to Score is 83% for Nasaf vs 33% for Mash'al, and the visitors’ shot conversion rate is 15% vs 6% for the hosts, which increases the risk of goals from Nasaf. Considering the expected 2.79 goals and the calculated probability of Over 1.5 at ~77%, I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics show Mash'al were level at the break in 6 of 6 matches (100%), while Nasaf led at halftime in only 1 of 6 (17%), and the average first-half goals are 0.17 for Mash'al versus 0.67 for Nasaf — a strong signal for a halftime draw. Over the full match Nasaf average 1.67 goals per game versus 0.83 for Mash'al and have a higher shot conversion rate (15% conversion vs 6%), even though the visitors’ xG is 1.33 versus the hosts’ 1.46; this suggests Nasaf are better at converting chances. The second half favors the visitors: Nasaf score on average 1.0 goal after the break, and the mean goals in the second halves of their matches is 1.5 versus 0.67 and 1.33 for Mash'al, which increases the probability of a second-half turnaround in Nasaf’s favor. Mash'al have kept a clean sheet at halftime in 83% of matches and have scored only 2 first-half goals this season, so the hosts very often go into the interval level but are not effective at finishing moves. Therefore I assign the highest probability to a halftime draw and a Nasaf win at full-time (X/2 = 38%), then X/X 25% and 2/2 14% — the distribution reflects Mash'al’s 100% HT draws and Nasaf’s superior second-half goal production and conversion.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

21Possession (%)79
Mash'alNasaf
7Shots27
Mash'alNasaf
4Shots on target9
Mash'alNasaf
1.08xG2.47
Mash'alNasaf
10Corners2
Mash'alNasaf
49Dangerous attacks21
Mash'alNasaf
9Fouls4
Mash'alNasaf
1Cards1
Mash'alNasaf

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.42Goals scored / game1.25
Mash'alNasaf
1.75Goals allowed / game1
Mash'alNasaf
42%Average possession51%
Mash'alNasaf
2.58Shots on target / game3.92
Mash'alNasaf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8Shots per game12.08
Mash'alNasaf
2.58Shots on target3.92
Mash'alNasaf
5.2%Shot conversion10.3%
Mash'alNasaf
42%Possession51%
Mash'alNasaf
1xG for1.39
Mash'alNasaf
1.73xG against1.39
Mash'alNasaf

Shooting quality

Mash'al: BalancedNasaf: Balanced
Mash'alNasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.160.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nasaf is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Mash'al · 1 pts / game - Nasaf

Mash'al
LLLLW
Season result split
8% W0% R92% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-11
0.25 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Nasaf
LLDDW
Season result split
33% W42% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-3
1.42 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 198% better for: goals scored per game.

0.42 goals / game - Mash'al · 1.25 goals / game - Nasaf

Nasaf is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.75 goals / game - Mash'al · 1 goals / game - Nasaf

Mash'al scoring profile: mixed

Mash'al scores in 42% of games (5 of 12 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Mash'al keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)15
Mash'alNasaf
21Goals conceded (season)12
Mash'alNasaf
2.17Average goals per game2.25
Mash'alNasaf
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Mash'alNasaf
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Mash'alNasaf

How often they score at least...

42%1 goal83%
Mash'alNasaf
0%2 goals33%
Mash'alNasaf
0%3 goals8%
Mash'alNasaf
0%4 goals0%
Mash'alNasaf

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal67%
Mash'alNasaf
67%2 goals25%
Mash'alNasaf
17%3 goals8%
Mash'alNasaf
0%4 goals0%
Mash'alNasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time25%
Mash'alNasaf
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Mash'alNasaf
0%Scored in both halves17%
Mash'alNasaf

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Mash'alNasaf
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mash'alNasaf
40%BTTS - last 580%
Mash'alNasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Mash'alNasaf
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Mash'alNasaf
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mash'alNasaf

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Mash'alNasaf
8%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Mash'alNasaf
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Mash'alNasaf

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasaf is 138% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.42 pts / game - Mash'al · 1 pts / game - Nasaf

Mash'al - half-time state
0% leading42% draw58% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
8% leading75% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.42Points per game (1st half)1
Mash'alNasaf
0.08Goals scored (1st half)0.42
Mash'alNasaf
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Mash'alNasaf
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.83
Mash'alNasaf
42%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Mash'alNasaf
92%No goal before half-time67%
Mash'alNasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per game (2nd half)1.58
Mash'alNasaf
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Mash'alNasaf
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Mash'alNasaf
1Average goals (2nd half)1.42
Mash'alNasaf
42%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Mash'alNasaf
67%No goal after half-time33%
Mash'alNasaf

Mash'al - second-half results

25% W17% R58% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.42
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nasaf - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding413%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mash'al - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nasaf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Mash'al
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
9
31-45
1
0
46-60
3
0
61-75
0
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Mash'al

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
31%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

Mash'alLigaNasaf
Average goals per game 2.172.59 2.25
Both teams scored 33%55% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%53% 33%
Clean sheets 8%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 58%69% 50%
Goal after half-time 83%79% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mash'alSubstitutionOn: Drago BumbarOff: Doston Tukhtaboyev
  2. Mash'alYellow cardIbrohim Ganikhonov
  3. Mash'alSubstitutionOn: Samandar OchilovOff: Ilhomjon Abdiganiyev
  4. Mash'alSubstitutionOn: Mahmud Jo'raboyevOff: Khumoyun Murtazaev
  5. NasafSubstitutionOn: Alibek DavronovOff: Adenis Shala
  6. NasafYellow cardBekjon Rahmatov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Mash'al's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nasaf. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Nasaf Qarshi
1 : 2
Mash'al Mubarek
Mash'al Mubarek
1 : 3
FC Nasaf Qarshi

FAQ

What was the result of Mash'al vs Nasaf?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Mash'al 1:1 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Mash'al and Nasaf?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Mash'al won 1, Nasaf won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Mash'al vs Nasaf?

Mash'al score 0.42 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.25. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Mash'al's matches and 58% of Nasaf's.

What form are Mash'al and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Mash'al have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Nasaf 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mash'al vs Nasaf?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mash'al vs Nasaf: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.