Mash'al vs Pakhtakor: match statistics
Mash'al vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mash'al played against Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Stadion im. Bahrom Vafoyev. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Mash'al has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Pakhtakor has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mash'al scores 0.48 goals per game and allows 2.00. Pakhtakor scores 1.76 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Mash'al's games and 62% of Pakhtakor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 52%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pakhtakor has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.01 per game. Mash'al takes 8.0 shots per game, while Pakhtakor takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Mash'al leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. Pakhtakor leads at halftime in 48% and scores 0.86 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mash'al's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Pakhtakor, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pakhtakor sit 2nd, while Mash'al are 16th, and the full-season record clearly favors the visitors: 13 wins and just 1 defeat compared with the hosts’ 1 win and 19 losses. Mash'al have lost all of their last 5 matches, scoring just 2 goals and conceding 13, highlighting simultaneous problems in both finishing and defense. At home, the hosts average only 0.3 goals, fail to score in 70% of matches, and register 2.7 shots on target, whereas Pakhtakor average 1.6 goals away from home with 4 shots on target. The visitors are also considerably more defensively consistent, conceding 0.7 goals per away match compared with Mash'al’s 1.4 at home, while their average xG stands at 1.41 versus 1.07 for the hosts. Pakhtakor have won 70% of their away matches and have not lost any of them, making an away win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are fairly high, standing at 64% for Mash'al and 60% for Pakhtakor; however, the hosts’ current form clearly weakens the signal for both teams to score. Mash'al have lost their last five matches, scoring just 2 goals in that run—an average of 0.4 per game—while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those fixtures. Over the same period, Pakhtakor conceded an average of just 0.8 goals and kept a clean sheet in 40% of their season matches, increasing the likelihood that the hosts will fail to score again. The hosts also have a low recent xG of 0.98, while Pakhtakor average 1.6 goals per match and Mash'al have conceded as many as 2.6 goals in their last five fixtures. The most likely outcome is therefore a scenario in which the visitors score, but at least one team—primarily Mash'al—fails to find the net. This supports BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team does not score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as Pakhtakor have seen matches finish below this line in 80% of games, compared with 64% for Mash'al. In their last five matches, Mash'al have scored just 2 goals, averaging 0.4 per game, while also suffering a five-match losing streak. Pakhtakor conceded only 0.8 goals per match over this period, which limits the hosts’ prospects despite their seasonal home average of 1.91 goals scored. The visitors should create more chances, as Mash'al have conceded 13 goals in their last five outings and allowed opponents an xG of 1.93; however, Pakhtakor themselves average only 1.6 goals scored. Both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in just 40% of their last five matches, so the projected total of around 2.35 goals more clearly supports a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Pakhtakor win at full-time, as Mash'al have lost their last five matches, scoring only 0.4 goals per game and conceding 2.6. In the first halves of this run, the hosts averaged 0.2 goals, while Pakhtakor have not conceded a single goal before the break, with 60% of their matches level at half-time. The visitors have also been significantly more consistent throughout the season: they win 70% of their matches and have suffered no defeats, whereas Mash'al are currently on a five-match losing streak. After the break, Pakhtakor average 1.0 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, while Mash'al concede 0.82 goals, which supports the match being decided in the visitors' favor during the second half. Although the hosts have historically often started well at home, their current form and Pakhtakor's defensive consistency provide stronger support for the X/2 outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mash'al | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pakhtakor is 267% better for: goals scored per game.
0.48 goals / game - Mash'al · 1.76 goals / game - Pakhtakor
Pakhtakor is 122% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Mash'al · 0.9 goals / game - Pakhtakor
Mash'al scores in 43% of games (9 of 21 games), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 games).
Pakhtakor scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 games), while Mash'al keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mash'al
Over / Under - Pakhtakor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pakhtakor is 342% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.43 pts / game - Mash'al · 1.9 pts / game - Pakhtakor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mash'al - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pakhtakor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mash'al
Pakhtakor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Mash'al | Liga | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.48 | 2.66 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 54% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mash'al's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Pakhtakor. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mash'al vs Pakhtakor?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Mash'al 1:2 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Mash'al and Pakhtakor?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Mash'al won 0, Pakhtakor won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Mash'al vs Pakhtakor?
Mash'al score 0.48 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.76. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Mash'al's matches and 62% of Pakhtakor's.
What form are Mash'al and Pakhtakor in?
Over the last 5 games Mash'al have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Pakhtakor 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mash'al vs Pakhtakor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


