Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 20 July 2026

Mashujaa vs Kitayosce: match statistics

Mashujaa crest
Mashujaa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce

Mashujaa vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mashujaa play Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 4 May 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Mashujaa: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mashujaa scores 0.53 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mashujaa 17%, Kitayosce 33%. Over 2.5: Mashujaa 13%, Kitayosce 40%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Mashujaa has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.25. Mashujaa: 7.9 shots per match, Kitayosce: 6.2.

Match halves

Mashujaa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.23. Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Mashujaa: 31-45+ (6 goals). Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Mashujaa at home remains unbeaten (0% losses) with 80% clean sheets, conceding only 0.2 goals per match on average and registering an average xG of 1.49, indicating a very solid defense and ability to create chances. Kitayosce has a better goal return this season (23 scored vs 11 for Mashujaa) and has scored 6 goals in the last 5 matches with 3 wins, but on the road they concede 1.4 goals on average and have a low xG for 0.81 and only 20% clean sheets. Mashujaa generates markedly more chances at home (avg. 10.25 shots and 4 on target) than the visitors away (4 shots and 1.71 on target), however the hosts convert that into just 0.7 goals per home match and have 40% of matches without scoring. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts have 1 win and 4 draws (4 scored, 2 conceded) for an average of 1.4 points per game, while the visitors have 3 wins and average 2 points per game, so visitors are superior on points, but the statistical profile (high xG and clean sheets for the hosts vs weaker away xG for the visitors) suggests a draw. Based on this I predict a draw and propose the probability distribution: 35% for a Mashujaa win, 45% for a draw and 20% for a Kitayosce win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
MashujaaKitayosce
9Shots11
MashujaaKitayosce
1Shots on target3
MashujaaKitayosce
1.27xG1.65
MashujaaKitayosce
4Corners1
MashujaaKitayosce
86Dangerous attacks102
MashujaaKitayosce
-1Fouls-1
MashujaaKitayosce
-1Cards-1
MashujaaKitayosce

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.53Goals scored / match1.1
MashujaaKitayosce
0.87Goals conceded / match0.93
MashujaaKitayosce
43%Average possession42%
MashujaaKitayosce
2.77Shots on target / match2.27
MashujaaKitayosce

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.87Shots per match6.23
MashujaaKitayosce
2.77Shots on target2.27
MashujaaKitayosce
6.8%Shot conversion17.6%
MashujaaKitayosce
43%Possession42%
MashujaaKitayosce
1.37xG for1.25
MashujaaKitayosce
1.5xG against1.3
MashujaaKitayosce

Shooting quality

Mashujaa: BalancedKitayosce: Counter-attacking
MashujaaKitayosce
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mashujaa
LLWWL
Season result split
27% W37% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-11
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-6-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 108% better for: goals scored per match.

0.53 goals / match - Mashujaa · 1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce

Mashujaa is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Mashujaa · 0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce

Mashujaa scoring profile: more difficult

Mashujaa scores in 40% of matches (12 of 30 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Mashujaa keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 matches).

16Goals scored (season)33
MashujaaKitayosce
26Goals conceded (season)28
MashujaaKitayosce
1.4Average goals in match2.03
MashujaaKitayosce
3Goals scored (last 5)2
MashujaaKitayosce
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
MashujaaKitayosce

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal57%
MashujaaKitayosce
10%2 goals30%
MashujaaKitayosce
3%3 goals17%
MashujaaKitayosce
0%4 goals7%
MashujaaKitayosce

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal57%
MashujaaKitayosce
20%2 goals27%
MashujaaKitayosce
7%3 goals10%
MashujaaKitayosce
3%4 goals0%
MashujaaKitayosce

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time17%
MashujaaKitayosce
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MashujaaKitayosce
3%Scored in both halves13%
MashujaaKitayosce

BTTS and goal count

7%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
MashujaaKitayosce
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
MashujaaKitayosce
0%BTTS - last 520%
MashujaaKitayosce

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
MashujaaKitayosce
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
MashujaaKitayosce
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
MashujaaKitayosce

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
MashujaaKitayosce
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
MashujaaKitayosce
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
MashujaaKitayosce

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Mashujaa · 1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce

Mashujaa - half-time state
17% leading53% draw30% trailing
Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.13
MashujaaKitayosce
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.53
MashujaaKitayosce
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
MashujaaKitayosce
0.67Average goals (1st half)1
MashujaaKitayosce
67%Clean sheet before half-time60%
MashujaaKitayosce
80%No goal before half-time67%
MashujaaKitayosce

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per match (2nd half)1.3
MashujaaKitayosce
0.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
MashujaaKitayosce
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
MashujaaKitayosce
0.63Average goals (2nd half)0.9
MashujaaKitayosce
70%Clean sheet after half-time67%
MashujaaKitayosce
80%No goal after half-time67%
MashujaaKitayosce

Mashujaa - second-half results

17% W60% R23% P
31
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mashujaa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mashujaa
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
0
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mashujaa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

MashujaaLigaKitayosce
Average goals in match 1.402.17 2.03
Both teams scored 17%35% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%39% 40%
Clean sheets 50%39% 43%
Goal before half-time 50%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 43%63% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mashujaa 0 - 1 - 0 Kitayosce. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Kitayosce FC
0 : 0
Mashujaa FC

FAQ

What was the result of Mashujaa vs Kitayosce?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Mashujaa 1:0 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mashujaa vs Kitayosce?

Mashujaa score 0.53 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.10. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Mashujaa's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.

What form are Mashujaa and Kitayosce in?

Over the last 5 games Mashujaa have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kitayosce 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mashujaa vs Kitayosce?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mashujaa vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.