Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Masr vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics

Masr crest
Masr
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia

Masr vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Masr played against Kahraba Ismailia in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on May 29, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Masr has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Kahraba Ismailia has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Masr scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 0.94. Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.06 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of Masr's games and 66% of Kahraba Ismailia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 53%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Masr has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.17 per game. Masr takes 10.9 shots per game, while Kahraba Ismailia takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Masr leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.78 after halftime.

When the teams score

Masr's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For Kahraba Ismailia, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Masr holds the statistical edge: 12 wins this season vs 7 for Kahraba, and a goal record of 38 scored and 30 conceded vs 34 scored and 52 conceded for the visitors. At home Masr concedes on average 0.8 goals per match and records 47% clean sheets, while Kahraba concede 1.08 goals in away matches and have only 31% clean sheets. The hosts generate higher xG at home (1.31 vs 1.11) and average 4.13 shots on target per match vs 3.15 for the guests, giving them an advantage in chance quality. The visitors have slightly higher shot conversion (14% vs 10%) and average 1.23 goals on the road, but their high number of goals conceded (52 this season) diminishes that threat. Considering league position (8 vs 19), similar form in the last 5 matches (both 2-2-1) and the hosts’ defensive edge, I assess the probabilities as 60% for Masr, 22% for a draw and 18% for Kahraba.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'Both Teams To Score' scenario appears dominant based on the stats: Masr has a season BTTS of 74% and concedes 2.00 goals per match on average, while Kahraba Ismailia has a BTTS of 54% and concedes 1.08 on average, which together increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Masr records BTTS 60%, scoring 1.4 and conceding 1.2 goals on average, whereas Kahraba has BTTS 40%, scoring 1.0 and conceding 1.0, indicating the hosts more often open matches and opponents are capable of responding. xG confirms this dynamic: Masr generates 1.21 xG and allows 1.60 xG, and Kahraba generates 1.11 xG and allows 1.51 xG, so both teams create chances while also showing defensive vulnerabilities. Additionally, Masr has only 11% clean sheets this season versus 31% for Kahraba, and average shots on target are similar (3.05 vs 3.15), meaning the opponent has a realistic chance to score even with lower shooting efficiency. Considering these numbers and the fact that the Over 2.5 + BTTS combination occurs for the hosts in 57% of cases, I assign the 'Yes' scenario a 75% probability and 'No' 25%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: Masr has an attacking xG of 1.21, while Kahraba concedes 1.51 xG per match, yielding about 1.36 expected goals for the home side; Kahraba’s xG is 1.11 and Masr concedes 1.60 xG, giving approximately 1.36 for the visitors and a total of ~2.72 goals. Seasonal data confirm a propensity for goals — Masr have 79% of matches over 1.5 goals, Kahraba 69%; hosts concede on average 2.0 goals at home, while visitors score on average 1.23 goals. BTTS rates are 74% (Masr) and 54% (Kahraba), and over 0.5 occurred in 89% and 100% of matches respectively, which strengthens the both-teams-to-score signal. A Poisson model on a 2.72 total yields ~75.5% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Therefore the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 is borderline (~51%) and Over 3.5 has low probability (~29%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I forecast a draw at half-time because the home side average 0.26 goals in the first half, the visitors 0.31, and half-time draws occurred in 47% of the home team’s matches and 54% of the visitors’ matches. The home team lead at the break in only 11% of games, and the away team in 23%, which further indicates a high rate of stalemates after 45 minutes. I favor the visitors after the break: they have 54% of wins this season versus 0% for the hosts, and in second halves the visitors win 46% of matches and average 1.77 points, while the home side have only 5% second-half wins and 0.63 points. Additionally, goals are scored very frequently in the second half — in 89% of the home team’s matches and 92% of the visitors’ — and the home team concedes an average of 1.37 goals after the break versus 0.69 conceded by the visitors, which supports a turnaround in favor of the away side. Therefore I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at half-time and away win (X/2) as the strongest signal; an additional argument is the visitors’ superior shot conversion rate, 14% versus 10% for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
MasrKahraba Ismailia
15Shots13
MasrKahraba Ismailia
5Shots on target7
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.5xG1.59
MasrKahraba Ismailia
2Corners7
MasrKahraba Ismailia
28Dangerous attacks38
MasrKahraba Ismailia
6Fouls6
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1Cards1
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.19Goals scored / game1.06
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0.94Goals allowed / game1.63
MasrKahraba Ismailia
51%Average possession46%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
3.84Shots on target / game3.09
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.94Shots per game9.28
MasrKahraba Ismailia
3.84Shots on target3.09
MasrKahraba Ismailia
10.9%Shot conversion11.4%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
51%Possession46%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.24xG for1.17
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.31xG against1.57
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Shooting quality

Masr: BalancedKahraba Ismailia: Balanced
MasrKahraba Ismailia
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Masr is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Masr · 1.6 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Masr
DWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-12-8
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Kahraba Ismailia
WDWLD
Season result split
22% W31% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-15
0.97 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-3
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Masr is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1.19 goals / game - Masr · 1.06 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Masr is 73% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.94 goals / game - Masr · 1.63 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Masr scoring profile: very strong

Masr scores in 78% of games (25 of 32 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 meczów).

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 78% of games (25 of 32 meczów), while Masr keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)34
MasrKahraba Ismailia
30Goals conceded (season)52
MasrKahraba Ismailia
2.13Average goals per game2.69
MasrKahraba Ismailia
9Goals scored (last 5)5
MasrKahraba Ismailia
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
MasrKahraba Ismailia

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal78%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
34%2 goals28%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
6%3 goals0%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals0%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

How often they concede at least...

66%1 goal81%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
28%2 goals47%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0%3 goals19%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals13%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

66%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.21 of 32 meczów
46%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time13%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
3%BTTS in both halves3%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
28%Scored in both halves16%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
80%BTTS - last 540%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Masr is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Masr · 0.97 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Masr - half-time state
28% leading53% draw19% trailing
Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
16% leading50% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)0.97
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.28
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.06Average goals (1st half)0.81
MasrKahraba Ismailia
59%Clean sheet before half-time63%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
47%No goal before half-time75%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1.09
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
MasrKahraba Ismailia
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1.09
MasrKahraba Ismailia
1.06Average goals (2nd half)1.88
MasrKahraba Ismailia
59%Clean sheet after half-time31%
MasrKahraba Ismailia
47%No goal after half-time31%
MasrKahraba Ismailia

Masr - second-half results

31% W47% D22% L
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

22% W44% D34% L
31
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Masr - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.00
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Masr
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
11
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
8
5
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
4
8
31-45
9
7
46-60
9
11
61-75
7
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Masr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

MasrLigaKahraba Ismailia
Average goals per game 2.132.00 2.69
Both teams scored 56%46% 66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%34% 53%
Clean sheets 34%35% 19%
Goal before half-time 66%58% 50%
Goal after half-time 69%69% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MasrYellow cardAbdel Rahman Emad
  2. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardAbdel Fattah Ashraf Sheta
  3. Kahraba IsmailiaGoalAli SuliemanAssist: Islam Abdelnaim Abdelkader
  4. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Farouk Mohamed Alii El HallagOff: Mohamed Shika
  5. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Omar El SaidOff: Mohamed Abdelmonem

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Masr's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Kahraba Ismailia. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Masr vs Kahraba Ismailia?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Masr 1:1 Kahraba Ismailia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Masr vs Kahraba Ismailia?

Masr score 1.19 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 1.06. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Masr's matches and 66% of Kahraba Ismailia's.

What form are Masr and Kahraba Ismailia in?

Over the last 5 games Masr have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Masr vs Kahraba Ismailia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.