Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Mbeya City vs Azam: match statistics
Mbeya City vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mbeya City plays Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Recent form
Mbeya City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Azam has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Mbeya City scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.41. Azam scores 1.31 and allows 0.31. Games in this league average 1.95 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Mbeya City's games and 25% of Azam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 31%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Azam has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.06 per game. Mbeya City takes 4.8 shots per game, while Azam takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Mbeya City leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Azam leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mbeya City's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Azam, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.95 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mbeya City | Azam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Azam is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Mbeya City · 1.8 pts / game - Azam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 49% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - Mbeya City · 1.31 goals / game - Azam
Azam is 355% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.41 goals / game - Mbeya City · 0.31 goals / game - Azam
Mbeya City scores in 53% of games (9 of 17 games), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 75% (12 of 16 games).
Azam scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 games), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mbeya City
Over / Under - Azam
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Mbeya City · 1.81 pts / game - Azam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mbeya City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Azam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mbeya City
Azam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Mbeya City | Liga | Azam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.29 | 1.95 | ▼ 1.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 35% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 35% | 33% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 42% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mbeya City's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Azam. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.