MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou: match statistics
MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MEAP Nisou played against Digenis Morphou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
MEAP Nisou has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Digenis Morphou has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
MEAP Nisou scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.88. Digenis Morphou scores 1.63 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 88% of MEAP Nisou's games and 50% of Digenis Morphou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.36 per game. MEAP Nisou takes 8.0 shots per game, while Digenis Morphou takes 7.9.
First-half and second-half trends
MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Digenis Morphou leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
MEAP Nisou's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Digenis Morphou, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | Digenis Morphou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.87 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MEAP Nisou is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 1 pts / game - Digenis Morphou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Digenis Morphou is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.88 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.13 goals / game - Digenis Morphou
MEAP Nisou scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while Digenis Morphou keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).
Digenis Morphou scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
Over / Under - Digenis Morphou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Digenis Morphou is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.25 pts / game - Digenis Morphou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Digenis Morphou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MEAP Nisou
Digenis Morphou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | Digenis Morphou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.50 | 2.57 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 88% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 29% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 68% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Digenis MorphouGoalKonstantinos Nissis
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 0:3 Digenis Morphou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou?
MEAP Nisou score 1.63 goals per game on average and Digenis Morphou 1.63. The Second Division average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 88% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 50% of Digenis Morphou's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and Digenis Morphou in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Digenis Morphou 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for MEAP Nisou vs Digenis Morphou: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.