MEAP Nisou vs Karmiotissa: match statistics
Karmiotissa is showing significantly better form and statistics than MEAP Nisou. The away team holds 3rd place in the table with a record of 9 wins, 5 draws, and only 3 losses, while the hosts are in 7th position with just 6 wins and as many as 9 defeats. The form in the last 5 matches clearly favors Karmiotissa – 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 points per match) compared to MEAP Nisou's disastrous run of 4 losses and only 1 win (0.6 points per match). At home, the hosts have a negative goal difference (-9), lose 67% of their matches, and concede an average of 2 goals per game. Karmiotissa, in away matches, maintains defensive solidity (44% clean sheets, averaging 1.11 goals conceded) and offensive efficiency (1.33 goals per game). Considering all these factors, the clear favorites are the away team.
MEAP Nisou vs Karmiotissa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
MEAP Nisou played against Karmiotissa in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
MEAP Nisou has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Karmiotissa has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
MEAP Nisou scores 1.06 goals per game and allows 1.78. Karmiotissa scores 1.71 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of MEAP Nisou's games and 53% of Karmiotissa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 53%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Karmiotissa has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.53 per game. MEAP Nisou takes 9.0 shots per game, while Karmiotissa takes 9.2.
First-half and second-half trends
MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Karmiotissa leads at halftime in 47% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
MEAP Nisou's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Karmiotissa, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Karmiotissa is showing significantly better form and statistics than MEAP Nisou. The away team holds 3rd place in the table with a record of 9 wins, 5 draws, and only 3 losses, while the hosts are in 7th position with just 6 wins and as many as 9 defeats. The form in the last 5 matches clearly favors Karmiotissa – 3 wins and 2 draws (2.2 points per match) compared to MEAP Nisou's disastrous run of 4 losses and only 1 win (0.6 points per match). At home, the hosts have a negative goal difference (-9), lose 67% of their matches, and concede an average of 2 goals per game. Karmiotissa, in away matches, maintains defensive solidity (44% clean sheets, averaging 1.11 goals conceded) and offensive efficiency (1.33 goals per game). Considering all these factors, the clear favorites are the away team.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| MEAP Nisou | Karmiotissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Karmiotissa is 267% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 2.2 pts / game - Karmiotissa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karmiotissa is 61% better for: goals scored per game.
1.06 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.71 goals / game - Karmiotissa
Karmiotissa is 89% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.78 goals / game - MEAP Nisou · 0.94 goals / game - Karmiotissa
MEAP Nisou scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 meczów), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).
Karmiotissa scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
Over / Under - Karmiotissa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Karmiotissa is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - MEAP Nisou · 1.76 pts / game - Karmiotissa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Karmiotissa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
MEAP Nisou
Karmiotissa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| MEAP Nisou | Liga | Karmiotissa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.62 | • 2.65 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 29% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KarmiotissaGoalMarios Kokκinoftas
Head-to-head
Record from MEAP Nisou's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Karmiotissa. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of MEAP Nisou vs Karmiotissa?
The Second Division match finished MEAP Nisou 1:3 Karmiotissa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before MEAP Nisou vs Karmiotissa?
MEAP Nisou score 1.06 goals per game on average and Karmiotissa 1.71. The Second Division average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of MEAP Nisou's matches and 53% of Karmiotissa's.
What form are MEAP Nisou and Karmiotissa in?
Over the last 5 games MEAP Nisou have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Karmiotissa 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for MEAP Nisou vs Karmiotissa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.