Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya: match statistics

Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Mekelakeya crest
Mekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl play Mekelakeya in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 29 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Mekelakeya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Mekelakeya scores 1.15 and concedes 0.85. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 37%, Mekelakeya 41%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 26%, Mekelakeya 31%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelakeya has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.12. Mebrat Hayl: 7.0 shots per match, Mekelakeya: 8.6.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50. Mekelakeya: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). Mekelakeya: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X): both teams are close in the table (Mekelakeya 4th, Mebrat Hayl 5th) and have nearly identical season records (10 wins, 12 draws, 6 losses each), indicating an even contest. The home side’s strength is their home defence — conceding only 0.36 goals per home match on average and keeping clean sheets in 64% of games, with just 7% home defeats. Mekelakeya, however, is clearly superior offensively: 34 goals this season versus the hosts’ 22, averaging 1.71 goals on the road, 3.21 shots on target per match and a 19% conversion rate, while the hosts average 2.31 shots on target and 12% conversion. Additionally, the visitors arrive in better form (1.8 points average in the last 5 matches vs 1.6 for the hosts) and are less likely to be shut out away (only in 14% of matches), whereas the hosts fail to score at home in 50% of games. Given Mebrat Hayl’s excellent defence (0.36 goals conceded and 64% clean sheets) and Mekelakeya’s higher-quality shooting chances (xG 1.32 vs 1.1; 3.21 shots on target), the most likely outcome is a low-scoring draw (0:0 or 1:1).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0Shots9
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0Shots on target1
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.31xG1.04
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
2Corners6
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
40Dangerous attacks53
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
-1Fouls-1
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
-1Cards-1
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.84Goals scored / match1.15
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.68Goals conceded / match0.85
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
53%Average possession56%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
2.21Shots on target / match2.9
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match8.64
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
2.21Shots on target2.9
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
12%Shot conversion13.4%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
53%Possession56%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
1.12xG for1.32
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
1.16xG against0.98
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedMekelakeya: Efficient finishing
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mebrat Hayl is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.8 pts / match - Mekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mekelakeya
LLWLD
Season result split
36% W41% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-16-9
1.49 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-7-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.15 goals / match - Mekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.85 goals / match - Mekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 46% (18 of 39 matches).

Mekelakeya scoring profile: mixed

Mekelakeya scores in 67% of matches (26 of 39 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

32Goals scored (season)45
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
26Goals conceded (season)33
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
1.53Average goals in match2
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal67%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
18%2 goals33%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
8%3 goals13%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
3%4 goals3%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal54%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
16%2 goals23%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0%3 goals5%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0%4 goals3%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time18%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
11%Scored in both halves15%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
60%BTTS - last 520%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time54%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelakeya is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.44 pts / match - Mekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing
Mekelakeya - half-time state
31% leading51% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.44
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.55Average goals (1st half)1.05
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
82%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
74%No goal before half-time59%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.26
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.9
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
61%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya
61%No goal after half-time62%
Mebrat HaylMekelakeya

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelakeya - second-half results

23% W56% R21% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mekelakeya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
7
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.76
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaMekelakeya
Average goals in match 1.531.78 2.00
Both teams scored 37%40% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 31%
Clean sheets 47%40% 46%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 59%
Goal after half-time 63%59% 54%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mebrat Hayl 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelakeya. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 0:1 Mekelakeya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.84 goals per game on average and Mekelakeya 1.15. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 41% of Mekelakeya's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Mekelakeya in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mekelakeya 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mebrat Hayl vs Mekelakeya: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.