Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Mebrat Hayl vs Sidama Bunna: match statistics

Mebrat Hayl crest
Mebrat Hayl
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Sidama Bunna crest
Sidama Bunna
130%(2.75)
X30%(2.75)
240%(2.60)

Sidama Bunna sits in first place in the table and presents significantly better offensive form with 24 goals this season compared to Mebrat Hayl's mere 11. The visitors win 44% of their away matches and have a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%), indicating greater efficiency. While Mebrat Hayl boasts a solid home record (56% wins and 78% clean sheets), the recent form of both teams is similar (PPG 1.0 vs 1.2), and the hosts' poor scoring efficiency (44% FTS%) could be a problem. Taking into account the league leader's quality, as well as the advantage in xG and average goals per match, Sidama Bunna has a real chance of winning, although the hosts' solid defense could lead to a draw.

Mebrat Hayl vs Sidama Bunna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mebrat Hayl play Sidama Bunna in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 4 February 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mebrat Hayl: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Sidama Bunna: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mebrat Hayl scores 0.84 and concedes 0.68 goals per match. Sidama Bunna scores 1.13 and concedes 0.61. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mebrat Hayl 37%, Sidama Bunna 32%. Over 2.5: Mebrat Hayl 26%, Sidama Bunna 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Sidama Bunna has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.12. Mebrat Hayl: 7.0 shots per match, Sidama Bunna: 8.2.

Match halves

Mebrat Hayl: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.50. Sidama Bunna: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Mebrat Hayl: 46-60 (9 goals). Sidama Bunna: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Sidama Bunna sits in first place in the table and presents significantly better offensive form with 24 goals this season compared to Mebrat Hayl's mere 11. The visitors win 44% of their away matches and have a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%), indicating greater efficiency. While Mebrat Hayl boasts a solid home record (56% wins and 78% clean sheets), the recent form of both teams is similar (PPG 1.0 vs 1.2), and the hosts' poor scoring efficiency (44% FTS%) could be a problem. Taking into account the league leader's quality, as well as the advantage in xG and average goals per match, Sidama Bunna has a real chance of winning, although the hosts' solid defense could lead to a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
1Shots5
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0Shots on target2
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.4xG0.98
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
1Corners5
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
46Dangerous attacks73
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
16Fouls9
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0Cards0
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.84Goals scored / match1.13
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.68Goals conceded / match0.61
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
53%Average possession52%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
2.21Shots on target / match3.37
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match8.16
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
2.21Shots on target3.37
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
12%Shot conversion13.9%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
53%Possession52%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
1.12xG for1.26
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
1.16xG against1.04
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Shooting quality

Mebrat Hayl: BalancedSidama Bunna: Efficient finishing
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
Accuracy (shots on target)32%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sidama Bunna is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 2 pts / match - Sidama Bunna

Mebrat Hayl
LDWDW
Season result split
34% W39% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-10
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-10-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Sidama Bunna
WWDWL
Season result split
50% W29% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-11-8
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-5-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sidama Bunna is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

0.84 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.13 goals / match - Sidama Bunna

Sidama Bunna is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mebrat Hayl · 0.61 goals / match - Sidama Bunna

Mebrat Hayl scoring profile: mixed

Mebrat Hayl scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Sidama Bunna keeps a clean sheet in 53% (20 of 38 matches).

Sidama Bunna scoring profile: mixed

Sidama Bunna scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Mebrat Hayl keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

32Goals scored (season)43
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
26Goals conceded (season)23
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
1.53Average goals in match1.74
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal68%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
18%2 goals34%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
8%3 goals8%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
3%4 goals3%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal47%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
16%2 goals8%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0%3 goals5%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0%4 goals0%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time11%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
11%Scored in both halves16%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
60%BTTS - last 540%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sidama Bunna is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Mebrat Hayl · 1.55 pts / match - Sidama Bunna

Mebrat Hayl - half-time state
21% leading66% draw13% trailing
Sidama Bunna - half-time state
34% leading53% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.55
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.34Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.55Average goals (1st half)0.79
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
82%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
74%No goal before half-time55%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.95
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
61%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna
61%No goal after half-time61%
Mebrat HaylSidama Bunna

Mebrat Hayl - second-half results

26% W50% R24% P
49
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sidama Bunna - second-half results

32% W47% R21% P
59
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mebrat Hayl - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sidama Bunna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mebrat Hayl
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sidama Bunna
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
10
3
16-30
7
4
31-45
5
3
46-60
7
4
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mebrat Hayl

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Sidama Bunna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-20.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Mebrat HaylLigaSidama Bunna
Average goals in match 1.531.78 1.74
Both teams scored 37%40% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%28% 26%
Clean sheets 47%40% 53%
Goal before half-time 39%56% 58%
Goal after half-time 63%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mebrat Hayl 1 - 0 - 0 Sidama Bunna. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mebrat Hayl vs Sidama Bunna?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mebrat Hayl 0:0 Sidama Bunna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mebrat Hayl vs Sidama Bunna?

Mebrat Hayl score 0.84 goals per game on average and Sidama Bunna 1.13. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Mebrat Hayl's matches and 32% of Sidama Bunna's.

What form are Mebrat Hayl and Sidama Bunna in?

Over the last 5 games Mebrat Hayl have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Sidama Bunna 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mebrat Hayl vs Sidama Bunna?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.