China - China League OneHuitang StadiumData current as of 18 July 2026

Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: match statistics

Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Meizhou Hakka play Heilongjiang Lava Spring in China League One (China). The match date is 30 May 2026 at 13:30. Venue: Huitang Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Meizhou Hakka: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Meizhou Hakka scores 0.93 and concedes 2.07 goals per match. Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.50 and concedes 1.71. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Meizhou Hakka 50%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 86%. Over 2.5: Meizhou Hakka 71%, Heilongjiang Lava Spring 57%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.08. Meizhou Hakka: 8.4 shots per match, Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 11.1.

Match halves

Meizhou Hakka: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.50. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Meizhou Hakka: 61-75 (3 goals). Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Heilongjiang Lava Spring (6th) shows clearly better numbers than Meizhou Hakka (14th): the visitors have scored 12 goals this season versus the hosts' 6, and goal difference on the road is +2 for the visitors versus -9 for the hosts at home. In attack the visitors average 1.25 goals away with xG 1.05, have a 16% conversion rate and average 4 shots on target per game, while the hosts score 0.8 goals at home with xG 1.0, 12% conversion and 2.8 shots on target. The hosts concede as much as 2.6 goals per home game and have kept 0% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede only 0.75 goals per away game and have 25% clean sheets, indicating a significant defensive advantage for the visitors. In the last 5 matches the hosts have a record of 1 win and 4 losses with 3:11 goals and 0.6 points per game, while the visitors have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with a 7:9 goal record and 1.0 point per game; given better efficiency, a higher volume of chances (8 vs 6.8 average shots) and a more stable defense, I tip a visitors' win (65%), draw 20%, hosts 15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
16Shots16
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3Shots on target6
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.57xG1.76
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
6Corners7
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
50Dangerous attacks47
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
12Fouls14
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1Cards2
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.93Goals scored / match1.5
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.07Goals conceded / match1.71
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
46%Average possession51%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.86Shots on target / match4.29
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.43Shots per match11.07
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
2.86Shots on target4.29
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
11%Shot conversion13.5%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
46%Possession51%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.08xG for1.35
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.53xG against1.49
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Shooting quality

Meizhou Hakka: BalancedHeilongjiang Lava Spring: Efficient finishing
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Meizhou Hakka is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka · 0.6 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Meizhou Hakka
DDWLL
Season result split
29% W14% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
21% W57% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-3
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka · 1.5 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.07 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka · 1.71 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Meizhou Hakka scoring profile: very strong

Meizhou Hakka scores in 64% of matches (9 of 14 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

13Goals scored (season)21
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
29Goals conceded (season)24
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
3Average goals in match3.21
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
11Goals conceded (last 5)14
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal93%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
21%2 goals43%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
7%3 goals14%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%4 goals0%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal93%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
64%2 goals43%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
43%3 goals36%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
14%4 goals0%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

86%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 14 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
14%Scored in both halves29%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
80%BTTS - last 580%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka · 1.21 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Meizhou Hakka - half-time state
14% leading14% draw71% trailing
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per match (1st half)1.21
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.5
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
21%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
57%No goal before half-time50%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.71
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
36%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
64%No goal after half-time29%
Meizhou HakkaHeilongjiang Lava Spring

Meizhou Hakka - second-half results

29% W21% R50% P
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Meizhou Hakka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Meizhou Hakka
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
6
16-30
2
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
6
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Meizhou Hakka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Meizhou HakkaLigaHeilongjiang Lava Spring
Average goals in match 3.002.59 3.21
Both teams scored 50%54% 86%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%51% 57%
Clean sheets 14%28% 7%
Goal before half-time 93%72% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%73% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The China League One match finished Meizhou Hakka 0:0 Heilongjiang Lava Spring. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

Meizhou Hakka score 0.93 goals per game on average and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.50. The China League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Meizhou Hakka's matches and 86% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's.

What form are Meizhou Hakka and Heilongjiang Lava Spring in?

Over the last 5 games Meizhou Hakka have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring?

The statistical background for Meizhou Hakka vs Heilongjiang Lava Spring — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.