Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie: match statistics

Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mekelakeya play Shire Endaselassie in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 3 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mekelakeya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mekelakeya scores 1.15 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Shire Endaselassie scores 0.65 and concedes 0.86. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mekelakeya 41%, Shire Endaselassie 27%. Over 2.5: Mekelakeya 31%, Shire Endaselassie 19%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Mekelakeya has higher xG: 1.32 vs 0.95. Mekelakeya: 8.6 shots per match, Shire Endaselassie: 5.3.

Match halves

Mekelakeya: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46. Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Mekelakeya: 31-45+ (13 goals). Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Mekelakeya has a clear positional and offensive advantage: they sit 6th in the table vs Shire Endaselassie’s 16th and have scored 28 goals this season vs the opponent’s 16. At home the hosts average 8.92 shots per game with 3 on target, while the visitors average only 5.92 shots and 2.5 on target away; additionally the hosts’ home xG is 1.28 vs the visitors’ 0.99 xG, indicating higher quality attacking chances for Mekelakeya. Defensively the hosts concede 0.67 goals per game at home and keep clean sheets in 50% of home matches, whereas Shire concede 0.92 goals away and have only a 33% clean sheet rate; moreover the visitors fail to score in 67% of their away matches vs 50% for the hosts. In the last five matches Mekelakeya average 1.2 points (record 1-3-1) and Shire 0.8 points (1-1-3), which confirms the visitors’ weaker away form. Considering the xG advantage (1.28 vs 0.99), greater shot volume (8.92 vs 5.92) and better home defence, I forecast a home win, although Mekelakeya’s high home draw rate (42%) also indicates a real risk of a point share and a low-scoring outcome.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
10Shots2
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
3Shots on target1
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
1.63xG0.75
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
11Corners3
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
108Dangerous attacks75
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
-1Fouls-1
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
-1Cards-1
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
1.15Goals scored / match0.65
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.85Goals conceded / match0.86
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
56%Average possession45%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
2.9Shots on target / match2.14
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.64Shots per match5.27
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
2.9Shots on target2.14
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
13.4%Shot conversion12.3%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
56%Possession45%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
1.32xG for0.95
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.98xG against1.24
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Shooting quality

Mekelakeya: Efficient finishingShire Endaselassie: Counter-attacking
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
Accuracy (shots on target)34%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shire Endaselassie is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelakeya
LLWLD
Season result split
36% W41% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-16-9
1.49 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Shire Endaselassie
DDLWL
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelakeya is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Mekelakeya · 0.65 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelakeya scoring profile: strong

Mekelakeya scores in 67% of matches (26 of 39 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (15 of 37 matches).

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: mixed

Shire Endaselassie scores in 46% of matches (17 of 37 matches), while Mekelakeya keeps a clean sheet in 46% (18 of 39 matches).

45Goals scored (season)24
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
33Goals conceded (season)32
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
2Average goals in match1.51
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
2Goals scored (last 5)4
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal46%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
33%2 goals14%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
13%3 goals5%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
3%4 goals0%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal59%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
23%2 goals19%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
5%3 goals5%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
3%4 goals3%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

27%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 37 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time11%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0%BTTS in both halves0%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
15%Scored in both halves11%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
20%BTTS - last 520%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time51%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

2nd half

54%Min. 1 goal after half-time51%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mekelakeya is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - Mekelakeya · 1.27 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Mekelakeya - half-time state
31% leading51% draw18% trailing
Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
24% leading54% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.27
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.38
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.73
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
64%Clean sheet before half-time70%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
59%No goal before half-time68%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.05
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.78
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
69%Clean sheet after half-time62%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie
62%No goal after half-time76%
MekelakeyaShire Endaselassie

Mekelakeya - second-half results

23% W56% R21% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

16% W57% R27% P
47
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelakeya - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mekelakeya
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
7
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
1
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+128%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mekelakeya

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

MekelakeyaLigaShire Endaselassie
Average goals in match 2.001.78 1.51
Both teams scored 41%40% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%28% 19%
Clean sheets 46%40% 41%
Goal before half-time 59%56% 51%
Goal after half-time 54%59% 51%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mekelakeya 0 - 1 - 0 Shire Endaselassie. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Mekelakeya 1:1 Shire Endaselassie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie?

Mekelakeya score 1.15 goals per game on average and Shire Endaselassie 0.65. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Mekelakeya's matches and 27% of Shire Endaselassie's.

What form are Mekelakeya and Shire Endaselassie in?

Over the last 5 games Mekelakeya have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shire Endaselassie 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie?

The statistical background for Mekelakeya vs Shire Endaselassie — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.