Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran: match statistics
Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mes Kerman played against Naft Gachsaran in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on June 9, 2026. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Mes Kerman has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Naft Gachsaran has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mes Kerman scores 0.63 goals per game and allows 0.52. Naft Gachsaran scores 0.78 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 1.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 22% of Mes Kerman's games and 48% of Naft Gachsaran's. The Over 2.5 rates are 15% and 26%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Kerman has the higher season xG average, 0.94 to 0.69 per game. Mes Kerman takes 2.9 shots per game, while Naft Gachsaran takes 0.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Mes Kerman leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.37 goals per game after halftime. Naft Gachsaran leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mes Kerman's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Naft Gachsaran, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.49 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a home win because Mes Kerman has a clear advantage in chance creation and defensive stability at home. At home the hosts average 9.5 shots per game, of which 3.88 are on target, and they have an xG of 1.27, whereas Naft Gachsaran on the road average 4.44 shots, 1.78 on target and xG 0.69. Mes Kerman concedes just 0.62 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches, while the visitors concede 1.14 goals away and keep clean sheets in only 29% of games. Despite similar goalscoring outputs (0.62 goals for the hosts vs 0.64 for the visitors), Naft arrive in better recent form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 pts/match), but their historical away efficiency is only 7% wins with 57% draws. Considering the higher xG (1.27 vs 0.69), greater shot volume (9.5 vs 4.44) and the superior home defense, the forecast favors a Mes Kerman victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Mes Kerman scores on average 0.92 and concedes 0.77 per match, while Naft Gachsaran scores 0.64 and concedes 1.14. Season BTTS rates are 38% for the home side and 57% for the away side; in the last 5 matches these are 20% (Mes) and 40% (Naft), indicating a decline in mutual goals for the home team. Using a Poisson approximation: the probability Mes Kerman scores is ~64% (1 - e^-0.92 ≈ 60% and 1 - e^-1.14 ≈ 68%, average ≈64%), and Naft scores ~50% (1 - e^-0.64 ≈ 47% and 1 - e^-0.77 ≈ 54%, average ≈50%), giving a combined chance of both teams scoring of about 32% (0.64×0.50 ≈ 0.32). Additionally, the league has a low BTTS rate of 30% and the home team keeps a clean sheet in 38% of matches, so a scenario where at least one team does not score is more likely. Given these figures I recommend backing "No" (no BTTS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of goals scored and conceded: home 1.03 = (0.92 + 1.14)/2, away 0.71 = (0.64 + 0.77)/2, total 1.74. A Poisson model with lambda = 1.74 gives probability of 0 goals ≈ 17.6% and 1 goal ≈ 30.6%, so chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) ≈ 51.8%, Over 2.5 ≈ 25.2%, and Over 3.5 ≈ 9.9%. These results align with seasonal indicators: home team has 62% of matches Over 1.5 and only 23% Over 2.5, away 64% and 29% respectively, suggesting matches often reach 2 goals but rarely 3 or more. In the short term the home side averaged 0.8 goals in the last 5, away 1.2 (total 2.0), and last5 xG for home is 0.79 — this slightly increases scoring potential but is insufficient to change the rarity of matches with ≥3 goals. As a result the strongest signal from the data is Under 2.5 (estimated 75% probability), hence the recommendation to back the Under line at 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Mes Kerman appears to be the favorite based on seasonal data: the home side have won 46% of matches and average 1.69 points per game versus Naft Gachsaran with 7% wins and 0.79 points per game. A draw at the break occurs very frequently — Mes Kerman had HT draws in 7 matches (54%), the visitors had HT draws in 8 matches (57%), giving roughly a 55% chance of a draw at half-time. The hosts score better across halves: they average 0.62 goals in the first half versus 0.29 for the visitors and additionally record 0.69 goals in the second half, which increases their likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Considering Mes Kerman led at half-time in 5 matches (38%) and have a 46% season win rate, the most probable scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time home win (X/1 — 30%), followed by 1/1 (28%) and X/X (15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Kerman | Naft Gachsaran | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | -9% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.33 | 0.85 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.71 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Naft Gachsaran is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Mes Kerman · 2.2 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Naft Gachsaran is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
0.63 goals / game - Mes Kerman · 0.78 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran
Mes Kerman is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.52 goals / game - Mes Kerman · 0.96 goals / game - Naft Gachsaran
Mes Kerman scores in 52% of games (14 of 27 meczów), while Naft Gachsaran keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 meczów).
Naft Gachsaran scores in 63% of games (17 of 27 meczów), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 59% (16 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
Over / Under - Naft Gachsaran
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Gachsaran is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Mes Kerman · 1.33 pts / game - Naft Gachsaran
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Naft Gachsaran - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mes Kerman
Naft Gachsaran
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Kerman | Liga | Naft Gachsaran | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.15 | 1.49 | ▲ 1.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 30% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 21% | ▲ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 59% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 37% | 45% | ▲ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 56% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mes Kerman's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Naft Gachsaran. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 0:0 Naft Gachsaran. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran?
Mes Kerman score 0.63 goals per game on average and Naft Gachsaran 0.78. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Mes Kerman's matches and 48% of Naft Gachsaran's.
What form are Mes Kerman and Naft Gachsaran in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Naft Gachsaran 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran?
The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Naft Gachsaran — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


