Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Bahonar StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr: match statistics

Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Pars Jam Bushehr crest
Pars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Kerman play Pars Jam Bushehr in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 21 June 2026 at 16:30. Venue: Shahid Bahonar Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pars Jam Bushehr: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53 goals per match. Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.29 and concedes 0.65. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Kerman 26%, Pars Jam Bushehr 38%. Over 2.5: Mes Kerman 15%, Pars Jam Bushehr 32%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.93. Mes Kerman: 3.6 shots per match, Pars Jam Bushehr: 0.6.

Match halves

Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35. Pars Jam Bushehr: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). Pars Jam Bushehr: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back a Pars Jam Bushehr win (2), primarily due to superior goal output and finishing efficiency – the visitors have 32 goals this season versus 18 for Mes Kerman and average 1.21 away goals compared to the hosts’ 0.57 at home. Pars convert chances markedly better (conversion rate ~21% vs 6% for Mes) and are less likely to be shut out: visitors failed to score in only 14% of away matches versus 50% for the hosts at home. In the last 5 matches Pars conceded just 1 goal while scoring 4, whereas Mes conceded 3 and scored 4; form points per game over the last five are 1.6 for Pars and 1.2 for Mes. At the same time Mes Kerman possess a strong home defence – only 0.57 goals conceded per game and 57% clean sheets, with higher home xG (1.28 vs 0.90), indicating they create chances but lack finishing quality. Considering Pars’ superior shooting efficiency and Mes’ poor home conversion, I expect an away win in a low-scoring game or a draw only if finishing goes against Pars.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
19Shots6
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
13Shots on target4
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
2.75xG1.08
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
11Corners1
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
92Dangerous attacks58
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
-1Fouls-1
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
-1Cards-1
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.68Goals scored / match1.29
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.53Goals conceded / match0.65
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
26%Average possession11%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
1.35Shots on target / match0.12
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.59Shots per match0.56
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
1.35Shots on target0.12
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
18.9%Shot conversion231.6%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
26%Possession11%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
1.1xG for0.93
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
1.03xG against1.06
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Shooting quality

Mes Kerman: Counter-attackingPars Jam Bushehr: Counter-attacking
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
Accuracy (shots on target)38%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.311.66
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.5010.75

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 2.6 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W44% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pars Jam Bushehr
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 90% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 1.29 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman · 0.65 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman scoring profile: mixed

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).

Pars Jam Bushehr scoring profile: mixed

Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).

23Goals scored (season)44
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
18Goals conceded (season)22
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
1.21Average goals in match1.94
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
5Goals scored (last 5)12
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal74%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
12%2 goals38%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
3%3 goals9%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%4 goals6%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal50%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
9%2 goals15%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%3 goals0%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%4 goals0%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Pars Jam Bushehr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
6%Scored in both halves24%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
40%BTTS - last 540%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

35%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
12%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman · 1.59 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Pars Jam Bushehr - half-time state
38% leading44% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.59
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.44Average goals (1st half)0.82
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
82%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
76%No goal before half-time56%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.35Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
0.68Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
68%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr
68%No goal after half-time50%
Mes KermanPars Jam Bushehr

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W53% R24% P
42
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results

35% W50% R15% P
54
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Pars Jam Bushehr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Pars Jam Bushehr
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
9
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
9
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Pars Jam Bushehr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
187%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Mes KermanLigaPars Jam Bushehr
Average goals in match 1.211.59 1.94
Both teams scored 26%30% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 15%22% 32%
Clean sheets 56%46% 50%
Goal before half-time 35%46% 62%
Goal after half-time 56%57% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Mes Kerman 1 - 0 - 0 Pars Jam Bushehr. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:1 Pars Jam Bushehr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Mes Kerman score 0.68 goals per game on average and Pars Jam Bushehr 1.29. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Mes Kerman's matches and 38% of Pars Jam Bushehr's.

What form are Mes Kerman and Pars Jam Bushehr in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pars Jam Bushehr 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Pars Jam Bushehr — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.