Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mes Kerman played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on December 20, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Mes Kerman has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Sanat Naft has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Mes Kerman scores 0.47 goals per game and allows 0.47. Sanat Naft scores 0.93 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 1.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 13% of Mes Kerman's games and 40% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 27%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 23% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.10 to 0.95 per game. Mes Kerman takes 3.6 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 6.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Mes Kerman leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.27 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mes Kerman's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.49 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 23% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Kerman | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.54 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Mes Kerman · 3 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 98% better for: goals scored per game.
0.47 goals / game - Mes Kerman · 0.93 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Mes Kerman is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.47 goals / game - Mes Kerman · 0.53 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Mes Kerman scores in 40% of games (6 of 15 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 meczów).
Sanat Naft scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Kerman is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / game - Mes Kerman · 1.07 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mes Kerman
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Kerman | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 0.93 | 1.49 | • 1.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 13% | 30% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 13% | 23% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 57% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Kerman 1:1 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?
Mes Kerman score 0.47 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.93. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 13% of Mes Kerman's matches and 40% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Mes Kerman and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Kerman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Sanat Naft 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft?
The statistical background for Mes Kerman vs Sanat Naft — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.