Mes Rafsanjan vs Foolad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Mes Rafsanjan play Foolad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 10 December 2025 at 14:45. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Mes Rafsanjan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Foolad: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.59 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Foolad scores 0.95 and concedes 0.73. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Mes Rafsanjan 27%, Foolad 41%. Over 2.5: Mes Rafsanjan 27%, Foolad 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Foolad has higher xG: 0.98 vs 0.87. Mes Rafsanjan: -0.3 shots per match, Foolad: 4.2.

Match halves

Mes Rafsanjan: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.32. Foolad: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Mes Rafsanjan: 76-90+ (4 goals). Foolad: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-1Shots-1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-1Shots on target-1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0xG0
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-1Corners-1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0Dangerous attacks0
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-1Fouls-1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0Cards4
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.59Goals scored / match0.95
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1.32Goals conceded / match0.73
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1%Average possession22%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-0.86Shots on target / match0.73
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-0.27Shots per match4.18
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-0.86Shots on target0.73
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
-216.7%Shot conversion22.8%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1%Possession22%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.87xG for0.98
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1.31xG against0.9
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Shooting quality

Mes Rafsanjan: BalancedFoolad: Counter-attacking
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
Accuracy (shots on target)0%17%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.001.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Foolad is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 2.6 pts / match - Foolad

Mes Rafsanjan
DLLWL
Season result split
14% W27% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-13
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Foolad
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W45% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-5
1.41 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Foolad is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.59 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 0.95 goals / match - Foolad

Foolad is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 0.73 goals / match - Foolad

Mes Rafsanjan scoring profile: mixed

Mes Rafsanjan scores in 36% of matches (8 of 22 matches), while Foolad keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

Foolad scoring profile: mixed

Foolad scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

13Goals scored (season)21
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
29Goals conceded (season)16
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1.91Average goals in match1.68
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
2Goals scored (last 5)12
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal55%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
23%2 goals32%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0%3 goals9%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0%4 goals0%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal64%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
41%2 goals9%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
18%3 goals0%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
5%4 goals0%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time9%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
9%Scored in both halves18%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0%BTTS - last 580%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time45%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Foolad is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.77 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan · 1 pts / match - Foolad

Mes Rafsanjan - half-time state
9% leading50% draw41% trailing
Foolad - half-time state
14% leading59% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per match (1st half)1
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.86Average goals (1st half)0.59
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
45%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
77%No goal before half-time82%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

After half-time (2nd half)

0.82Points per match (2nd half)1.86
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
1.05Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
50%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad
77%No goal after half-time45%
Mes RafsanjanFoolad

Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results

14% W41% R45% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Foolad - second-half results

50% W36% R14% P
22
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding229%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Rafsanjan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Foolad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Mes Rafsanjan
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
7
31-45
3
8
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Foolad
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
29%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Mes Rafsanjan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Foolad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Mes RafsanjanLigaFoolad
Average goals in match 1.911.79 1.68
Both teams scored 27%38% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%28% 27%
Clean sheets 32%41% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%54% 45%
Goal after half-time 59%62% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Mes Rafsanjan vs Foolad?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Mes Rafsanjan 0:0 Foolad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Mes Rafsanjan vs Foolad?

Mes Rafsanjan score 0.59 goals per game on average and Foolad 0.95. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Mes Rafsanjan's matches and 41% of Foolad's.

What form are Mes Rafsanjan and Foolad in?

Over the last 5 games Mes Rafsanjan have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Foolad 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Rafsanjan vs Foolad?

The statistical background for Mes Rafsanjan vs Foolad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.