Mes Rafsanjan vs Persepolis: match statistics
Mes Rafsanjan vs Persepolis: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mes Rafsanjan played against Persepolis in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on December 26, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Mes Rafsanjan has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Persepolis has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.57 goals per game and allows 1.36. Persepolis scores 1.07 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 1.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Mes Rafsanjan's games and 43% of Persepolis's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 21%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persepolis has the higher season xG average, 1.13 to 0.87 per game. Mes Rafsanjan takes 0.1 shots per game, while Persepolis takes 3.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Mes Rafsanjan leads at halftime in 7% of its games and scores 0.21 goals per game after halftime. Persepolis leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mes Rafsanjan's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Persepolis, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.74 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Rafsanjan | Persepolis | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | -564% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 6.21 | 0.31 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.88 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persepolis is 550% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan · 2.6 pts / game - Persepolis
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persepolis is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
0.57 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan · 1.07 goals / game - Persepolis
Persepolis is 172% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.36 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan · 0.5 goals / game - Persepolis
Mes Rafsanjan scores in 36% of games (5 of 14 meczów), while Persepolis keeps a clean sheet in 57% (8 of 14 meczów).
Persepolis scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Rafsanjan
Over / Under - Persepolis
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persepolis is 116% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.79 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan · 1.71 pts / game - Persepolis
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 7%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Persepolis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mes Rafsanjan
Persepolis
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Rafsanjan | Liga | Persepolis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.93 | 1.74 | ▼ 1.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 37% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 29% | 24% | ▼ 21% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 42% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 56% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Rafsanjan vs Persepolis?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Mes Rafsanjan 0:1 Persepolis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Rafsanjan vs Persepolis?
Mes Rafsanjan score 0.57 goals per game on average and Persepolis 1.07. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Mes Rafsanjan's matches and 43% of Persepolis's.
What form are Mes Rafsanjan and Persepolis in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Rafsanjan have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Persepolis 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Rafsanjan vs Persepolis?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.