Mes Soongoun vs Navad Urmia: match statistics
Analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams from the bottom of the table, occupying 16th and 17th positions. Mes Soongoun displays better home form with a 27% win rate and an xG advantage (1.92 vs 0.98), however, their shooting efficiency is dramatically low – just a 4% shot conversion rate and only 6 goals at home all season. Navad Urmia has poor away form with just a 9% win rate and a series of 4 losses in their last 5 matches, but their defensive statistics (1.18 goals conceded per game) are slightly better than the hosts' offensive capabilities. Considering Navad Urmia's high draw percentage (27% away, 10 draws this season) and both teams' low efficiency, the most likely scenario is a points share. The key factor is that both teams struggle to score goals, which favors low scores and draw outcomes.
Mes Soongoun vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mes Soongoun played against Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Mes Soongoun has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Navad Urmia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mes Soongoun scores 0.24 goals per game and allows 1.24. Navad Urmia scores 0.67 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 1.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 5% of Mes Soongoun's games and 43% of Navad Urmia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 19% and 19%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Soongoun has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.05 per game. Mes Soongoun takes 4.9 shots per game, while Navad Urmia takes 1.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Mes Soongoun leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.10 goals per game after halftime. Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mes Soongoun's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Navad Urmia, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.52 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Analysis indicates a closely contested match between two teams from the bottom of the table, occupying 16th and 17th positions. Mes Soongoun displays better home form with a 27% win rate and an xG advantage (1.92 vs 0.98), however, their shooting efficiency is dramatically low – just a 4% shot conversion rate and only 6 goals at home all season. Navad Urmia has poor away form with just a 9% win rate and a series of 4 losses in their last 5 matches, but their defensive statistics (1.18 goals conceded per game) are slightly better than the hosts' offensive capabilities. Considering Navad Urmia's high draw percentage (27% away, 10 draws this season) and both teams' low efficiency, the most likely scenario is a points share. The key factor is that both teams struggle to score goals, which favors low scores and draw outcomes.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mes Soongoun | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 8% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.32 | 0.61 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.14 | 4.79 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Soongoun is 400% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Mes Soongoun · 0.2 pts / game - Navad Urmia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 179% better for: goals scored per game.
0.24 goals / game - Mes Soongoun · 0.67 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Navad Urmia is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.24 goals / game - Mes Soongoun · 0.9 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Mes Soongoun scores in 24% of games (5 of 21 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).
Navad Urmia scores in 57% of games (12 of 21 meczów), while Mes Soongoun keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mes Soongoun
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navad Urmia is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / game - Mes Soongoun · 1 pts / game - Navad Urmia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mes Soongoun - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mes Soongoun
Navad Urmia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Mes Soongoun | Liga | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.48 | 1.52 | • 1.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 5% | 33% | ▲ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 38% | 45% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 48% | 47% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 52% | 57% | • 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Mes Soongoun's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Navad Urmia. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mes Soongoun vs Navad Urmia?
The Azadegan League match finished Mes Soongoun 0:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mes Soongoun vs Navad Urmia?
Mes Soongoun score 0.24 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.67. The Azadegan League average is 1.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 5% of Mes Soongoun's matches and 43% of Navad Urmia's.
What form are Mes Soongoun and Navad Urmia in?
Over the last 5 games Mes Soongoun have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mes Soongoun vs Navad Urmia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.