Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare: match statistics
Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Metaloglobus played against CSM Satu Mare in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Green Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Metaloglobus has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. CSM Satu Mare has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Metaloglobus scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.83. CSM Satu Mare scores 0.33 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of Metaloglobus's games and 33% of CSM Satu Mare's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 0%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metaloglobus has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.30 per game. Metaloglobus takes 11.2 shots per game, while CSM Satu Mare takes 10.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Metaloglobus leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.17 goals per game after halftime. CSM Satu Mare leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Metaloglobus's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For CSM Satu Mare, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metaloglobus have a clearly superior season record: they have secured 2 wins, while CSM Satu Mare have failed to win any of their 6 matches and sit 19th. The hosts average 1.33 goals per home game, whereas the visitors average just 0.33 away from home, failing to score in 67% of matches. Metaloglobus also create more in attack, averaging 5 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 3.67, while their home xG stands at 1.48. Recent results also favor the hosts, who have won 2 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in that span, while CSM Satu Mare have managed just 1 goal. Both teams concede an average of 1.33 goals in their respective home and away matches, leaving room for a draw; however, the visitors’ poor finishing and lack of clean sheets away from home point to a Metaloglobus victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have recorded BTTS in only 33% of their matches so far, well below the league average of 62%. The strongest argument for a scenario in which at least one side fails to score is CSM Satu Mare’s form: they have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those fixtures. Metaloglobus conceded an average of 2.0 goals during this period, but CSM created just 0.95 xG, which limits the credibility of their chances of breaking through. The hosts are also not a team that scores regularly over the course of the season, averaging 0.33 goals, with a shot conversion rate of only 4%. Although Metaloglobus’s last 5 matches produced BTTS in 100% of cases, the visitors’ extremely poor attacking output points more strongly towards BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In the league matches played so far, neither team has recorded a game with more than 2 goals: both Metaloglobus and CSM Satu Mare have 100% of their matches finishing Under 2.5 and Under 3.5 goals. Both teams are averaging just 0.33 goals scored in this competition, while the visitors have failed to score in 67% of their appearances. Metaloglobus’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 1.8 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, but CSM Satu Mare have managed just 0.2 goals per game over the same period. The hosts’ attacking potential is boosted by an xG of 1.73 across their last five matches, but the visitors’ xG stands at just 0.95, limiting the prospects of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.20 goals gives a clear edge to the Under 3.5 bet, as it would take at least four goals for it to lose—something neither team has recorded in the league so far.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Metaloglobus victory, as CSM Satu Mare have scored only 0.2 goals per match over their last five games and have not won any of them. The visitors were level at the break in 40% of their recent appearances, while also failing to score after half-time in any of those five matches. Metaloglobus have averaged 1.2 goals after the break, compared with 0.0 for their opponents, and have collected an average of 1.4 points per match in this period, versus just 0.2 for CSM Satu Mare. The hosts also have a clearly stronger current attack, averaging 1.8 goals over their last five matches compared with 0.2 for the visitors, which supports a decisive outcome after a cautious start.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Metaloglobus | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.10 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metaloglobus is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Metaloglobus · 0.4 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metaloglobus is 355% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Metaloglobus · 0.33 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
CSM Satu Mare is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.83 goals / game - Metaloglobus · 1.17 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
Metaloglobus scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while CSM Satu Mare keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
CSM Satu Mare scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 games), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
Over / Under - CSM Satu Mare
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CSM Satu Mare is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - Metaloglobus · 1 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
CSM Satu Mare - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Metaloglobus
CSM Satu Mare
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Metaloglobus | Liga | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.33 | 2.89 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 62% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 58% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 83% | 83% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CSM Satu MareGoalDenis Golda
- MetaloglobusGoalIme Udo Ndon
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare?
The Liga II match finished Metaloglobus 1:1 CSM Satu Mare. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare?
Metaloglobus score 1.50 goals per game on average and CSM Satu Mare 0.33. The Liga II average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Metaloglobus's matches and 33% of CSM Satu Mare's.
What form are Metaloglobus and CSM Satu Mare in?
Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and CSM Satu Mare 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare?
The statistical background for Metaloglobus vs CSM Satu Mare — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.