Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: match statistics
UTA Arad displays significantly superior form and quality compared to Metaloglobus, making them the clear favorites for this encounter. The hosts sit 16th in the table with just 2 wins all season, scoring a mere 23 goals while conceding 64. Their home form is disastrous, featuring a 64% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a winless run in their last 5 matches overall. Despite average recent form, UTA Arad boasts considerably better away stats: a 36% away win rate, 10% shot conversion, and an average of 1.21 goals per game. The visitors also lead in xG (1.41 vs 1.32), indicating superior chance creation. Given the vast gap in class and the fact that Metaloglobus loses 50% of their home games without scoring, UTA Arad is expected to secure the victory.
Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Metaloglobus played against UTA Arad in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Metaloglobus has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. UTA Arad has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Metaloglobus scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 2.21. UTA Arad scores 1.28 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Metaloglobus's games and 59% of UTA Arad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 66% and 48%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
UTA Arad has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.29 per game. Metaloglobus takes 10.4 shots per game, while UTA Arad takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Metaloglobus leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. UTA Arad leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Metaloglobus's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For UTA Arad, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
UTA Arad displays significantly superior form and quality compared to Metaloglobus, making them the clear favorites for this encounter. The hosts sit 16th in the table with just 2 wins all season, scoring a mere 23 goals while conceding 64. Their home form is disastrous, featuring a 64% loss rate, only 14% wins, and a winless run in their last 5 matches overall. Despite average recent form, UTA Arad boasts considerably better away stats: a 36% away win rate, 10% shot conversion, and an average of 1.21 goals per game. The visitors also lead in xG (1.41 vs 1.32), indicating superior chance creation. Given the vast gap in class and the fact that Metaloglobus loses 50% of their home games without scoring, UTA Arad is expected to secure the victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Metaloglobus | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTA Arad is 62% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - Metaloglobus · 1.28 goals / game - UTA Arad
UTA Arad is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.21 goals / game - Metaloglobus · 1.45 goals / game - UTA Arad
Metaloglobus scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while UTA Arad keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
UTA Arad scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 meczów), while Metaloglobus keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metaloglobus
Over / Under - UTA Arad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTA Arad is 117% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.59 pts / game - Metaloglobus · 1.28 pts / game - UTA Arad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metaloglobus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 7%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
UTA Arad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Metaloglobus
UTA Arad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Metaloglobus | Liga | UTA Arad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.57 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 52% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 66% | 48% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 3% | 27% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 70% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Metaloglobus's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against UTA Arad. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?
The Liga I match finished Metaloglobus 2:2 UTA Arad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?
Metaloglobus score 0.79 goals per game on average and UTA Arad 1.28. The Liga I average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Metaloglobus's matches and 59% of UTA Arad's.
What form are Metaloglobus and UTA Arad in?
Over the last 5 games Metaloglobus have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and UTA Arad 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metaloglobus vs UTA Arad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.