Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics
Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Metta - LU play JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. JDFS Alberts: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Metta - LU scores 3.54 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. JDFS Alberts scores 2.15 and concedes 1.62. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Metta - LU 54%, JDFS Alberts 77%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 85%, JDFS Alberts 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.83 vs 1.90. Metta - LU: 20.1 shots per match, JDFS Alberts: 14.4.
Match halves
Metta - LU: half-time lead 85%, second-half goals 1.54. JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.38.
Goals by minute
Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). JDFS Alberts: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Metta has a clear offensive edge and control of the game: at home they average 4.0 goals per match with xG 3.88, 32.25 shots and 17.75 shots on target, whereas JDFS Alberts away averages 1.5 goals, xG 1.82, 14 shots and 4.5 on target. Defensively Metta is superior — they concede 0.5 goals at home and keep 75% clean sheets, while JDFS concedes 1.75 goals away and has not recorded a single clean sheet. Form over the last 5 matches confirms this: Metta scored 18 goals and won 4 of 5 (2.4 pts per game in that period), JDFS has 9 goals and 3 wins in their last 5 with 2.0 pts per game. The xG differential (3.88 vs 1.82), chance conversion (12% for Metta vs 11% for JDFS) and the home goal difference (+14) all point to Metta’s dominance and a significantly weakened chance for the visitors. Therefore I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metta - LU is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU · 2 pts / match - JDFS Alberts
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 65% better for: goals scored per match.
3.54 goals / match - Metta - LU · 2.15 goals / match - JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU is 91% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.85 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.62 goals / match - JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (13 of 13 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
JDFS Alberts scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Metta - LU
Over / Under — JDFS Alberts
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 105% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.69 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.31 pts / match - JDFS Alberts
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 85% of matches and wins 85%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Metta - LU
JDFS Alberts
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.38 | 3.43 | ▲ 3.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 60% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 46% | 23% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 71% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 4:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
Metta - LU score 3.54 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.15. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Metta - LU's matches and 77% of JDFS Alberts's.
What form are Metta - LU and JDFS Alberts in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.