Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics
Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Metta - LU played against JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Metta - LU has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. JDFS Alberts has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Metta - LU scores 3.29 goals per game and allows 0.43. JDFS Alberts scores 1.67 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Metta - LU's games and 83% of JDFS Alberts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.20 to 1.78 per game. Metta - LU takes 25.9 shots per game, while JDFS Alberts takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Metta - LU leads at halftime in 86% of its games and scores 1.57 goals per game after halftime. JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 17% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Metta - LU's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For JDFS Alberts, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.39 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta has a clear offensive edge and control of the game: at home they average 4.0 goals per match with xG 3.88, 32.25 shots and 17.75 shots on target, whereas JDFS Alberts away averages 1.5 goals, xG 1.82, 14 shots and 4.5 on target. Defensively Metta is superior — they concede 0.5 goals at home and keep 75% clean sheets, while JDFS concedes 1.75 goals away and has not recorded a single clean sheet. Form over the last 5 matches confirms this: Metta scored 18 goals and won 4 of 5 (2.4 pts per game in that period), JDFS has 9 goals and 3 wins in their last 5 with 2.0 pts per game. The xG differential (3.88 vs 1.82), chance conversion (12% for Metta vs 11% for JDFS) and the home goal difference (+14) all point to Metta’s dominance and a significantly weakened chance for the visitors. Therefore I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
JDFS Alberts has a season BTTS rate of 100% and BTTS 80% in the last 5 matches, while Metta has a season BTTS 50% and only 20% in the last 5. Looking at goals, Metta scores 2.0 and concedes 0.5 per match, JDFS scores 1.5 and concedes 1.75; the league averages 3.35 goals per match. Based on xG: attacking xG is 1.71 for Metta and 1.82 for JDFS, and after accounting for opponent defenses we arrive at expected around 1.39 for Metta and 1.63 for JDFS, which implies probabilities of scoring at least one goal of ~75% and 80% and a preliminary BTTS around 60%. However, Metta’s form in the last 5 matches (avg 3.6 scored and 0.4 conceded; 18-2 across those 5 fixtures) and a season 50% clean sheet rate indicate Metta can keep opponents to a No Goal, which reduces the away side’s chance. Considering JDFS’s 100% BTTS, the strong xG signal and overall goal volume, I prefer BTTS - Yes with an estimated 65% vs 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Metta as the home side scores on average 2.0 goals and concedes only 0.5 per match, has xG 1.71 and in the last 5 matches averages 3.6 goals (last5 xG 3.36). JDFS Alberts scores on average 1.5 goals and concedes 1.75, with xG 1.82 and averages 1.8 goals in the last 5 fixtures. The sum of seasonal averages is 3.5 goals (2.0+1.5) against a league average of 3.35, and both teams have Over 1.5 in 100% of matches, therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 95%. Based on xG and form I project expected goals around 1.90 for Metta and 1.50 for JDFS (total ≈3.40); Metta has Over 2.5 in 50% of seasonal matches, JDFS in 75%, and in the last 5 respectively 80% and 60%, which gives a strong signal for Over 2.5 (≈70%). Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonally Metta 0%, JDFS 25%), therefore I recommend backing the over on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Metta - LU are clear favorites: they have a 100% win rate this season, score on average 2.0 goals and concede only 0.5 per match, while JDFS Alberts have a 25% win rate, score 1.5 and concede 1.75 goals per match. In the last 5 fixtures Metta led at the break in 80% of cases (4 of 5) and average 1.8 goals by half-time, whereas the visitors average 0.8 goals at the break and concede 0.6 in the last 5. xG comparison shows both teams create similar chances (home xG 1.71 vs away 1.82), but Metta converts chances better (15% vs 11%) and registers more shots on target (5.0 vs 4.5), which supports maintaining the lead. Additionally the hosts have 50% seasonal clean sheets and stronger home form (average 2.0 goals scored per game, 3.0 points per home match), therefore the most likely scenario is Metta leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1); other outcomes carry lower probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 52% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Metta - LU · 2 pts / game - JDFS Alberts
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 97% better for: goals scored per game.
3.29 goals / game - Metta - LU · 1.67 goals / game - JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU is 209% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.43 goals / game - Metta - LU · 1.33 goals / game - JDFS Alberts
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
JDFS Alberts scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metta - LU
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 171% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.71 pts / game - Metta - LU · 1 pts / game - JDFS Alberts
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 86% of games and wins 86%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Metta - LU
JDFS Alberts
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.71 | 3.39 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 59% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 67% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 71% | 24% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 69% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 4:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
Metta - LU score 3.29 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 1.67. The 1. Liga average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Metta - LU's matches and 83% of JDFS Alberts's.
What form are Metta - LU and JDFS Alberts in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs JDFS Alberts?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.