Metta - LU vs Riga FC II: match statistics
Metta - LU vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Metta - LU play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 6 April 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Riga FC II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Metta - LU scores 3.50 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.58 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Metta - LU 58%, Riga FC II 58%. Over 2.5: Metta - LU 83%, Riga FC II 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.86 vs 1.35. Metta - LU: 20.3 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.0.
Match halves
Metta - LU: half-time lead 83%, second-half goals 1.42. Riga FC II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Metta - LU: 31-45+ (10 goals). Riga FC II: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.48 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Metta - LU are the favorites for this fixture: in their last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss with a goal record of 11:7, while Riga FC II have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and a 10:8 goal record. Metta average 2.2 goals scored per match over these five games (11/5) and concede 1.4 goals (7/5), whereas Riga average 2.0 scored and 1.6 conceded. Season-to-date the hosts’ advantage is also evident: Metta have 3 goals for and 1 against, while Riga have 1 for and 3 against, corresponding to league positions 6 vs 12. In terms of points Metta collect on average 2.0 points per match in the last 5 games versus 1.4 for Riga, indicating greater consistency from the hosts. Based on these numbers I back a Metta - LU win; estimated probabilities are 60% home, 20% draw and 20% away, while the close goal aggregates (11:7 vs 10:8) suggest both teams possess goal-scoring capability.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 53% | 57% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Metta - LU is 44% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.8 pts / match - Riga FC II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 122% better for: goals scored per match.
3.5 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.58 goals / match - Riga FC II
Metta - LU is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.92 goals / match - Metta - LU · 1.83 goals / match - Riga FC II
Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
Riga FC II scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Metta - LU
Over / Under — Riga FC II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.67 pts / match - Metta - LU · 1.42 pts / match - Riga FC II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 83% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Riga FC II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +11 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Metta - LU
Riga FC II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | Riga FC II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.42 | 3.48 | • 3.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▼ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 68% | • 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 22% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 85% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs Riga FC II?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 2:0 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Riga FC II?
Metta - LU score 3.50 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.58. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Metta - LU's matches and 58% of Riga FC II's.
What form are Metta - LU and Riga FC II in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Riga FC II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Riga FC II?
The statistical background for Metta - LU vs Riga FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.