Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Metta - LU played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Venue: Hanzas vidusskolas laukums. Final score: 12:1.
Recent form
Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Metta - LU scores 3.80 goals per game and allows 0.87. Rīgas FS II scores 1.47 and allows 2.13. Games in this league average 3.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Metta - LU's games and 60% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 87% and 73%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 2.91 to 1.46 per game. Metta - LU takes 21.1 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Metta - LU leads at halftime in 80% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Metta - LU's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.49 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU lead the table, having won 12 of their 15 league matches this season, and have collected 13 points from their last five games, recording four wins and a draw. The hosts win 88% of their home matches, averaging 4.88 goals scored and creating chances worth 3.24 xG, while Rīgas FS II concede an average of 2 goals away from home, with 1.42 xG allowed to opponents. The difference in attacking intensity is striking: Metta average 25.13 shots and 14.75 shots on target per home game, compared with 10.71 and 3.71 respectively for the visitors. Rīgas FS II have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and fail to score in as many as 57% of their away games, which, combined with Metta’s defensive record of conceding just 0.88 goals per match, significantly limits the visitors’ chances. Metta’s run of 21 goals in their last five matches, compared with Rīgas FS II’s 8, further points to a decisive home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Metta - LU has recorded BTTS in 75% of matches, well above the league average of 63%, while this scenario occurred in 60% of their last five games. Rīgas FS II has a lower season-long BTTS rate of 43%, but their recent run produced as many as 80% of matches with both teams scoring. The home side should create plenty of chances, averaging 1.50 goals scored, while the visitors concede 2.00 per match and as many as 2.20 across their last five appearances. The chance of the visitors scoring remains realistic, supported by an average xG of 1.37 for the season and 1.87 in their last five matches, despite Metta - LU recently improving defensively and conceding only 0.80 goals per game during that period. The stronger attacking signals and Rīgas FS II’s high current BTTS rate slightly favor the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Metta - LU are in excellent offensive form, averaging 4.2 goals scored in their last five matches, supported by a very high xG of 2.72. Rīgas FS II conceded 2.2 goals per game during this period, while the hosts have exceeded 1.5 goals per match in 100% of their appearances this season. Although the visitors have averaged 1.87 xG over their last five league rounds, Metta allowed opponents just 0.61 xG during that period and conceded only 4 goals in total. The projected total of 3.10 goals and the league average of 3.49 point to a clear edge for the Over 1.5 goals market, which has the strongest statistical support.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Metta - LU are in excellent form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 4.2 goals and conceding just 0.8, while Rīgas FS II have lost 3 of their 5 games and allowed opponents to score 2.2 goals on average. The hosts held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, scoring an average of 1.6 goals before half-time, while the visitors took the lead in only 20% of such matches. Metta’s advantage should increase further after the interval, as they have averaged 2.6 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded across their last five second halves, while Rīgas FS II managed only 0.8 goals during that period. Seasonal xG figures also favor the hosts: their attacking potential stands at 1.54, whereas the visitors’ defense allows an average of 1.42 xG. The most likely scenario is therefore for Metta to take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Metta - LU | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 52% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU · 0.8 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 159% better for: goals scored per game.
3.8 goals / game - Metta - LU · 1.47 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Metta - LU is 145% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.87 goals / game - Metta - LU · 2.13 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (15 of 15 games), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 games).
Rīgas FS II scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 games), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Metta - LU
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.53 pts / game - Metta - LU · 1.67 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +9 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Metta - LU
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Metta - LU | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.67 | 3.49 | ▲ 3.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 87% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 21% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 85% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Metta - LU's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished Metta - LU 12:1 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II?
Metta - LU score 3.80 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.47. The 1. Liga average is 3.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Metta - LU's matches and 60% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are Metta - LU and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games Metta - LU have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Metta - LU vs Rīgas FS II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.