Mezőkövesd-Zsóry vs Videoton: match statistics
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry vs Videoton: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry play Videoton in NB II (Hungary). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Videoton: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry scores 1.27 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Videoton scores 1.23 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 40%, Videoton 47%. Over 2.5: Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 37%, Videoton 37%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Videoton has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.27. Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: 9.7 shots per match, Videoton: 9.9.
Match halves
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.63. Videoton: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.57.
Goals by minute
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry: 0-15 (10 goals). Videoton: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry sit 3rd with 11 wins and 32 goals this season; at home they average 0.9 goals scored and only 0.6 conceded per match, with a 70% clean sheet rate. Videoton are 6th with 29 goals this season; away they average 1.27 scored and 1.55 conceded, with just 9% clean sheets and a 45% loss rate on the road. Visitors register more shots (12.2 vs 10.4) and higher shot conversion (11% vs 9%), and xG is 1.44 for Videoton versus 1.30 for the hosts, indicating better chance creation by the visitors but also greater risk of conceding. In the last 5 matches Mezőkövesd scored 4 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Videoton scored 7 goals and average 2.2 points per game, so the visitors are in better form; however, the hosts’ defensive edge (0.6 vs 1.55 conceded) and a 60% home win rate favour Mezőkövesd.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Mezőkövesd-Zsóry | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry · 0.6 pts / match - Videoton
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while Videoton keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
Videoton scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Mezőkövesd-Zsóry keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Over / Under — Videoton
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Videoton is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Mezőkövesd-Zsóry · 1.6 pts / match - Videoton
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Videoton - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry
Videoton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Mezőkövesd-Zsóry | Liga | Videoton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.51 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 48% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 45% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 0 - 1 - 0 Videoton. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Mezőkövesd-Zsóry vs Videoton?
The NB II match finished Mezőkövesd-Zsóry 0:2 Videoton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Mezőkövesd-Zsóry vs Videoton?
Mezőkövesd-Zsóry score 1.27 goals per game on average and Videoton 1.23. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Mezőkövesd-Zsóry's matches and 47% of Videoton's.
What form are Mezőkövesd-Zsóry and Videoton in?
Over the last 5 games Mezőkövesd-Zsóry have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Videoton 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mezőkövesd-Zsóry vs Videoton?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.