Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC: match statistics
Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Miami FC II played against Brooklyn FC in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Miami FC II has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Brooklyn FC has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Miami FC II scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.43. Brooklyn FC scores 0.86 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Miami FC II's games and 29% of Brooklyn FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 57%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Brooklyn FC has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.39 per game. Miami FC II takes 11.6 shots per game, while Brooklyn FC takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Miami FC II leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Brooklyn FC leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Miami FC II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Brooklyn FC, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Miami FC II holds a clear edge heading into this match: at home they average 0.67 goals per game with 11.33 shots and 4 SOT, while Brooklyn FC averages 0.00 goals on the road with only 2.5 SOT. xG supports the gap — Miami posts 1.34 average xG in home matches versus Brooklyn's 1.12 xG away, while Brooklyn’s opponents generate 1.91 xG against them on the road compared to 1.55 xG against Miami. Defensively the visitors are significantly worse: Brooklyn concedes 3.00 goals on average away and has 100% of away matches without scoring, whereas Miami concedes 1.33 at home and keeps a clean sheet in 33% of home games. In the last 5 matches Miami scored 5 goals with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss (1.6 points per game), while Brooklyn scored 7 in their last 5 but arrive with two consecutive away losses. Considering Miami’s superior chance-creation (more SOT and higher xG) and Brooklyn’s disastrous away efficiency (0 goals, 100% FTS and 3.00 average goals conceded), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for No Goal/Both Teams To Score - No is that the away team has not scored in any match this season (100% scoreless games) and has a season goals-per-game of 0.0, which drastically reduces BTTS likelihood. Miami FC II averages 1.2 goals scored and concedes 0.8 at home; their offensive xG is 1.6 with xG against 1.64, while the visitors have offensive xG of 1.12 and xG against 1.91, highlighting the visitors’ issues creating high-quality chances. In the last 5 matches the visitors improved and scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), but despite this both teams record BTTS in only 20% of their last five games each (20% and 20%), so mutual scoring is rare. Additionally, Miami records 5.8 shots on target and 12.6 shots per game versus 2.5 and 8.5 for the opponents, increasing the likelihood of a one-sided match with the visitors failing to score. Considering the visitors’ season-long 0% BTTS, 100% of their matches without a goal, and only 40% BTTS for the hosts, I estimate BTTS 'no' probability at 75% and 'yes' at 25%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG calculations project 1.76 expected goals for Miami (xG attack 1.60 vs xG defense Brooklyn 1.91) and 1.38 for Brooklyn (xG attack 1.12 vs xG defense Miami 1.64), total 3.14. A Poisson distribution with mean 3.14 yields ~82% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~61% for 3+ goals (Over 2.5) and ~38% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Match data reinforce this picture: Miami averages 12.6 shots and 5.8 on target per game and has 60% of matches with >1.5 goals, while Brooklyn averages 8.5 shots and 2.5 on target, but records 100% of matches above 1.5 and 2.5 and concedes 3.0 goals per game on average. Considering the clear positive home xG and the visitors’ tendency for high-scoring matches, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has moderate value, and Over 3.5 is less certain given both teams’ 0% season rate for >3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side lead at the break in 60% of their matches (leadingAtHT_home = 60%, 3 of 5) and score an average of 0.8 goals before half-time versus 0.0 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home 0.8 vs scoredAVGHT_away 0.0), which strongly supports Miami FC II leading after 45 minutes. Over full matches Miami FC II generates xG 1.6 versus 1.12 for Brooklyn FC and averages 12.6 shots with 5.8 on target compared to the opponents’ 8.5 shots and 2.5 on target, i.e. they create substantially more chances. Brooklyn FC have yet to win (winPercentage_away 0%, losePercentage_away 100%) and concede an average of 3.0 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_away 3.0), which reduces their chances of a turnaround after the break. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the scenario of the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1 = 42%); the next significant options are a half-time draw with a later home win (X/1 = 12%) and the home side leading at half-time and the match finishing a draw (1/X = 12%). Away-win scenarios remain unlikely (1/2 + X/2 + 2/2 = 11% combined), hence the recommendation to play 1/1 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Miami FC II | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Miami FC II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Miami FC II · 0.8 pts / game - Brooklyn FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Miami FC II is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Miami FC II · 0.86 goals / game - Brooklyn FC
Miami FC II scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 meczów), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 meczów).
Brooklyn FC scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Miami FC II
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Brooklyn FC is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / game - Miami FC II · 1.57 pts / game - Brooklyn FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Miami FC II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Miami FC II
Brooklyn FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Miami FC II | Liga | Brooklyn FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.43 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 29% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 65% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
The USL Championship match finished Miami FC II 3:2 Brooklyn FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
Miami FC II score 1.00 goals per game on average and Brooklyn FC 0.86. The USL Championship average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Miami FC II's matches and 29% of Brooklyn FC's.
What form are Miami FC II and Brooklyn FC in?
Over the last 5 games Miami FC II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Brooklyn FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Miami FC II vs Brooklyn FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.