Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics
Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Middlesbrough played against Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The game was played on December 13, 2025. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Middlesbrough has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Queens Park Rangers has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Middlesbrough scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.05. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.35 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Middlesbrough's games and 70% of Queens Park Rangers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 60%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.47 per game. Middlesbrough takes 12.9 shots per game, while Queens Park Rangers takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Middlesbrough leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Queens Park Rangers leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Middlesbrough's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Queens Park Rangers, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Middlesbrough | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Queens Park Rangers is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Middlesbrough · 2.4 pts / game - Queens Park Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Middlesbrough is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Middlesbrough · 1.35 goals / game - Queens Park Rangers
Middlesbrough is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.05 goals / game - Middlesbrough · 1.5 goals / game - Queens Park Rangers
Middlesbrough scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
Queens Park Rangers scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Middlesbrough keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Middlesbrough
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Middlesbrough - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Middlesbrough
Queens Park Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Middlesbrough | Liga | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.55 | 2.64 | ▲ 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 52% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 23% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers?
The Championship match finished Middlesbrough 3:1 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers?
Middlesbrough score 1.50 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.35. The Championship average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Middlesbrough's matches and 70% of Queens Park Rangers's.
What form are Middlesbrough and Queens Park Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Middlesbrough have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers?
The statistical background for Middlesbrough vs Queens Park Rangers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.